Related articles by  
Other versions:

(Verbatim name)

ID

(Catalog Number)

ORG

DES

Invalid DOI was provided, please try again

XML
PDF
 
 
Twitter
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CiteCite
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • FigsFigs
  • TabsTabs
  • TaxaTaxa
  • DataData
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
  • NanopubsNanopubs
  • Article title
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Introduction
  • Systematics and distribution
    • Morphology
    • Ecology
    • Conservation status and threats
    • Review of monitoring experience in European countries
    • Austria
    • Bulgaria
    • Czech Republic
    • France
    • Germany
    • Poland
    • Romania
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Switzerland
    • Italy
    • Summary of the monitoring experiences
  • Methods
    • Sampling plan
      • Foreste Casentinesi 2014
      • Abruzzo, Lazio and Molise National Park 2014
      • Foreste Casentinesi 2015
      • Abruzzo, Lazio and Molise National Park 2015
      • Foreste Casentinesi 2016
      • Abruzzo, Lazio and Molise National Park 2016
    • Collection of environmental variables
  • Statistical analysis
    • Comparison amongst study areas
    • Habitat preferences of R. alpina
    • Comparison of wild trees, tripods and logs
  • Results
    • Difference between study areas
    • Number of sightings and habitat preferences for wild trees
    • Number of sightings and habitat preferences for logs
    • Comparison of the number of observed individuals
    • Phenology
  • Discussion
    • Description of the proposed monitoring method
    • Choosing trees
    • Checking the single trees
    • Constraints, spatial validity and possible interferences
    • Counting, quantification and data sharing
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories
Powered by