Related articles by
Research Article
Other versions:
- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- FigsFigs
- TabsTabs
- TaxaTaxa
- DataData
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
- NanopubsNanopubs
Conservation on the blink: Deficient technical reports threaten conservation in the Natura 2000 network. Biological Conservation 209: 11.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.003
Are species listed in the Annex II of the Habitats Directive better represented in Natura 2000 network than the remaining species? A test using Spanish bats. Biodiversity and Conservation 24: 2459.
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-015-0937-1
Smart Protected Area Placement Decelerates Biodiversity Loss: A Representation‐extinction Feedback Leads Rare Species to Extinction. Conservation Letters 10: 539.
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12302
Priority setting by sites and by species using rarity, richness and phylogenetic diversity: the case of neotropical glassfrogs (Anura: Centrolenidae). Biodiversity and Conservation 23: 909.
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-014-0642-5
Using null models to identify under-represented species in protected areas: A case study using European amphibians and reptiles. Biological Conservation 184: 290.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.02.006
Evaluation of habitat protection under the European Natura 2000 conservation network – The example for Germany. PLOS ONE 13: e0208264.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208264
Identification of areas of very high biodiversity value to achieve the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 key commitments. PeerJ 8: e10067.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10067
Late-Holocene fossil evidence and the interpretation of the vegetation in NW Iberia: management issues in the light of palaeoecological findings. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 28: 35.
DOI: 10.1007/s00334-018-0684-9
Species, Habitats, Society: An Evaluation of Research Supporting EU's Natura 2000 Network. PLoS ONE 9: e113648.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113648
At the intersection of cultural and natural heritage: Distribution and conservation of the type localities of Italian endemic vascular plants. Biological Conservation 214: 109.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.024
Is the Natura 2000 network effective to prevent the biological invasions?. Global Ecology and Conservation 16: e00497.
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00497
The umbrella effect of Natura 2000 annex species spreads over multiple taxonomic groups, conservation attributes and organizational levels. Animal Conservation 23: 407.
DOI: 10.1111/acv.12551
Model-Assisted Bird Monitoring Based on Remotely Sensed Ecosystem Functioning and Atlas Data. Remote Sensing 12: 2549.
DOI: 10.3390/rs12162549
Socioecological drivers facilitating biodiversity conservation in traditional farming landscapes. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 1: 1.
DOI: 10.1890/EHS15-0021.1
Global gap analysis of cactus species and priority sites for their conservation. Conservation Biology 33: 369.
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13196
Assessing Natura 2000 coverage of river fish species in Greece: What do field surveys show?. Journal for Nature Conservation 64: 126054.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126054
Potential enlargement of the European roller’ breeding range in the Carpathian Basin. Journal for Nature Conservation 56: 125841.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125841
Identifying conservation priorities for plant species in the Himalaya in current and future climates: A case study from Sikkim Himalaya, India. Biological Conservation 233: 176.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.02.036
Identifying the criteria underlying the political decision for the prioritization of the Greek Natura 2000 conservation network. Biological Conservation 166: 103.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.021
Protected areas offer refuge from invasive species spreading under climate change. Global Change Biology 23: 5331.
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13798
Toward An Innovative Strategic Approach For Sustainable Management Of Natural Protected Areas In Italy. GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY 13: 68.
DOI: 10.24057/2071-9388-2019-143
Is It Possible to Compromise Forest Conservation with Forest Use?. Earth 3: 1059.
DOI: 10.3390/earth3040061
Is the Natura 2000 network of the European Union the key land use policy tool for preserving Europe’s biodiversity heritage?. Land Use Policy 69: 408.
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.045
Ecological Fiscal Transfers in Europe – Evidence-Based Design Options for a Transnational Scheme. Ecological Economics 147: 373.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.031
The Contributions of the EU Nature Directives to the CBD and Other Multilateral Environmental Agreements. Conservation Letters 9: 479.
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12259
Towards forward-looking nature governance to meet conservation goals of Natura 2000 sites in the European Union: experts’ perspectives. Environment, Development and Sustainability : .
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02813-6
Relevant but neglected habitat types by the Directive 92/43 EEC in southern Italy. Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali 34: 457.
DOI: 10.1007/s12210-023-01136-6
Effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network to cover threatened species. Nature Conservation 4: 35.
DOI: 10.3897/natureconservation.4.3626
Moving into Protected Areas? Setting Conservation Priorities for Romanian Reptiles and Amphibians at Risk from Climate Change. PLoS ONE 8: e79330.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079330
A Paris-like agreement for biodiversity needs IPCC-like science. Global Ecology and Conservation 28: e01617.
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01617
Distribution of deadwood and other forest structural indicators relevant for bird conservation in Natura 2000 special protection areas in Poland. Scientific Reports 11: .
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94392-1
Collaboration Networks in Applied Conservation Projects across Europe. PLOS ONE 11: e0164503.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164503
Predicting regional hotspots of phylogenetic diversity across multiple species groups. Diversity and Distributions 26: 1305.
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13125
Nature protection areas of Europe are insufficient to preserve the threatened beetle Rosalia alpina (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae): evidence from species distribution models and conservation gap analysis. Ecological Entomology 43: 192.
DOI: 10.1111/een.12485
The challenge of implementing the European network of protected areas Natura 2000. Conservation Biology 29: 260.
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12366
Conservation success or increased crop damage risk? The Natura 2000 network for a thriving migratory and protected bird. Biological Conservation 236: 1.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.006
A gap analysis comparing the effectiveness of Natura 2000 and national protected area networks in representing European amphibians and reptiles. Biodiversity and Conservation 24: 1377.
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-015-0862-3
Predicted impacts of transport infrastructure and traffic on bird conservation in Swedish Special Protection Areas. Nature Conservation 36: 1.
DOI: 10.3897/natureconservation.36.31826
Effects of Natura 2000 and habitat variables used for habitat assessment on beetle assemblages in European beech forests. Insect Conservation and Diversity 8: 193.
DOI: 10.1111/icad.12101
Breeding population trends and pre-migration roost site survey of the Red-footed Falcon in Hungary. Ornis Hungarica 23: 77.
DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2015-0007
A low-cost and repeatable procedure for modelling the regional distribution of Natura 2000 terrestrial habitats. Journal of Maps 15: 79.
DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2018.1546625
How Well Do Protected Areas Safeguard Endangered White-Clawed Crayfish in Croatia?. Freshwater Crayfish 27: 69.
DOI: 10.5869/fc.2022.v27-1.69
Implementing the Habitats Directive: How science can support decision making. Journal for Nature Conservation 23: 27.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2014.12.002
Conserving the functional and phylogenetic trees of life of European tetrapods. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 370: 20140005.
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0005
Assessing the role of the aquatic Natura 2000 network to protect both freshwater European species of community interest and threatened species in a Mediterranean region. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 31: 1901.
DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3540
Evaluating and expanding the European Union's protected‐area network toward potential post‐2020 coverage targets. Conservation Biology 34: 654.
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13479
On how much biodiversity is covered in Europe by national protected areas and by the Natura 2000 network: insights from terrestrial vertebrates. Conservation Biology 29: 986.
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12535
National scale habitat suitability analysis to evaluate and improve conservation areas for a mature forest specialist species. Global Ecology and Conservation 38: e02218.
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02218
Monitoring protected areas from space: A multi-temporal assessment using raptors as biodiversity surrogates. PLOS ONE 12: e0181769.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181769
Protected areas and the ranges of threatened species: Towards the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030. Biological Conservation 284: 110166.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110166
Earth observation for habitat mapping and biodiversity monitoring. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 37: 1.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.10.007
Increasing taxonomic diversity and spatial resolution clarifies opportunities for protecting US imperiled species. Ecological Applications 32: .
DOI: 10.1002/eap.2534
Mind the gap in data poor Natura 2000 sites and how to tackle them using Earth Observation and scientific diving surveys. Marine Pollution Bulletin 188: 114595.
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114595
The Natura 2000 network and the ranges of threatened species in Greece. Biodiversity and Conservation 30: 945.
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-021-02125-7
Matches and mismatches between national and EU-wide priorities: Examining the Natura 2000 network in vertebrate species conservation. Biological Conservation 198: 193.
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.016
Sustainable Human–Nature Relations. Chapter 5: 79.
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-3049-4_5