<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://natureconservation.pensoft.net/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">10</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:6BEA2F36-F41A-5C4C-8F71-33F322F204B5</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0D3F4FBA-8FC4-4738-B942-05DB471A61E6</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Nature Conservation</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">NC</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1314-6947</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">1314-3301</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Pensoft Publishers</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/natureconservation.64.183777</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">183777</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="biological_taxon">
          <subject>Amphibia</subject>
          <subject>Animalia</subject>
          <subject>Vertebrata</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Animal conservation</subject>
          <subject>Biogeography</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="geographical_area">
          <subject>Asia</subject>
          <subject>China Seas</subject>
          <subject>Far East</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Analysis of amphibian diversity and its influencing factors in the coastal islands of southern Zhejiang</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Qi</surname>
            <given-names>Wenlong</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Li</surname>
            <given-names>Jianxiong</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Qin</surname>
            <given-names>Cheng</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Xie</surname>
            <given-names>Lei</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Li</surname>
            <given-names>Shuran</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">lishuran@wzu.edu.cn</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
            <given-names>Yongpu</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">zhangyp@wzu.edu.cn</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">College of Life and Environmental Science, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China</addr-line>
        <institution>College of Life and Environmental Science, Wenzhou University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Wenzhou</addr-line>
        <country>China</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/020hxh324</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Institute of Biodiversity Conservation and Utilization, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China</addr-line>
        <institution>Institute of Biodiversity Conservation and Utilization, Wenzhou University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Wenzhou</addr-line>
        <country>China</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/020hxh324</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A3">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Water Environment and Marine Biological Resources Protection, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China</addr-line>
        <institution>Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Water Environment and Marine Biological Resources Protection, Wenzhou University</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Wenzhou</addr-line>
        <country>China</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/020hxh324</uri>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding authors: Shuran Li (<email xlink:type="simple">lishuran@wzu.edu.cn</email>), Yongpu Zhang (<email xlink:type="simple">zhangyp@wzu.edu.cn</email>)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn fn-type="edited-by">
          <p>Academic editor: Yiannis Matsinos</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>05</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>64</volume>
      <fpage>59</fpage>
      <lpage>76</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/EB45BBE1-324A-5E61-922B-4A6C9B2E69AD">EB45BBE1-324A-5E61-922B-4A6C9B2E69AD</uri>
      <uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:href="https://zoobank.org/A7B4BECC-8FCD-4B57-A81A-275619361A55">A7B4BECC-8FCD-4B57-A81A-275619361A55</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>29</day>
          <month>12</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>21</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Wenlong Qi, Jianxiong Li, Cheng Qin, Lei Xie, Shuran Li, Yongpu Zhang</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:type="simple">https://zoobank.org/A7B4BECC-8FCD-4B57-A81A-275619361A55</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <label>Abstract</label>
        <p>The theory of island biogeography posits that geographical features play a key regulatory role in shaping biodiversity. As a dispersal-limited group, amphibians are particularly sensitive to island effects. To clarify the community structure characteristics of amphibians on the coastal islands of southern Zhejiang and identify their influencing factors, this study analyzed survey data collected from October 2021 to July 2025. Integrating island geographic characteristics and land cover data, cluster analysis, redundancy analysis, machine learning models, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (<abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev>) were employed to elucidate the driving mechanisms behind community structure. The results indicated that a total of nine amphibian species from five families and one order were recorded across 36 islands. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Duttaphrynus">Duttaphrynus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="melanostictus">melanostictus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Fejervarya">Fejervarya</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="multistriata">multistriata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Hylarana">Hylarana</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="guentheri">guentheri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> were identified as the dominant species, showing significant distribution correlations (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). The Shannon-Wiener index was highest on Dongtou Island, Damen Island, Lingkun Island, and Nanji Island. Cluster analysis based on community similarity using the elbow method grouped the islands into two categories. Human activities, along with the proportions of agricultural land and freshwater cover, significantly influenced the current amphibian community structure. The XGBoost model demonstrated the highest goodness of fit for diversity indices and exhibited optimal prediction stability. <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> analysis identified land area (<abbrev xlink:title="analysis identified land area">ARE</abbrev>), shape index (<abbrev xlink:title="shape index">SAI</abbrev>), and distance to the nearest mainland (<abbrev xlink:title="distance to the nearest mainland">MID</abbrev>) as key driving factors: <abbrev xlink:title="analysis identified land area">ARE</abbrev> had a strong positive effect on island biodiversity, whereas an increase in <abbrev xlink:title="shape index">SAI</abbrev> promoted diversity on small islands. An increase in <abbrev xlink:title="distance to the nearest mainland">MID</abbrev> generally reduced diversity on small islands but enhanced it on larger islands. This study quantifies the differential regulatory mechanisms of island geographic features and provides a basis for formulating biodiversity conservation strategies for coastal islands.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Key words:</label>
        <kwd>Аmphibians</kwd>
        <kwd>biodiversity</kwd>
        <kwd>coastal islands</kwd>
        <kwd>community structure</kwd>
        <kwd>machine learning</kwd>
        <kwd>southern Zhejiang</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <funding-group>
        <funding-statement>The Wenzhou Forestry Technology Promotion and Wildlife Protection and Management, Wenzhou Terrestrial Wild Vertebrate Resource Survey Project (2022-2024).</funding-statement>
      </funding-group>
    </article-meta>
    <notes>
      <sec sec-type="Citation" id="sec1">
        <title>Citation</title>
        <p>Qi W, Li J, Qin C, Xie L, Li S, Zhang Y (2026) Analysis of amphibian diversity and its influencing factors in the coastal islands of southern Zhejiang. Nature Conservation 64: 59–76. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3897/natureconservation.64.183777" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.64.183777</ext-link></p>
      </sec>
    </notes>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="sec2">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Island ecosystems, characterized by pronounced isolation, limited area, and well-defined boundaries, serve as ideal models for studying biogeography (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bickford et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Whittaker et al. 2017</xref>). The theory of island biogeography (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">MacArthur and Wilson 1967</xref>) posits that species richness is primarily influenced by island area and isolation. Island area determines habitat heterogeneity and resource availability, while isolation affects the rate of species immigration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Yu et al. 2020</xref>). The small-island effect (<abbrev xlink:title="small-island effect">SIE</abbrev>) further suggests that below a certain area threshold, the relationship between species richness and patch area is nonlinear (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Triantis et al. 2006</xref>), and it has become an integral part of the theoretical framework of island biogeography. <abbrev xlink:title="small-island effect">SIE</abbrev> proposes that when patch area falls below a specific threshold, species richness becomes independent of island area, with this threshold varying across different taxonomic groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Gao and Perry 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Yu et al. 2020</xref>). The <abbrev xlink:title="small-island effect">SIE</abbrev> threshold represents a critical turning point in biodiversity drivers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Menegotto et al. 2020</xref>), community function, and phylogenetic structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Matthews et al. 2020</xref>). Therefore, identifying the <abbrev xlink:title="small-island effect">SIE</abbrev> threshold can help predict minimum habitat requirements and contribute to mitigating biodiversity loss in island ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Yan et al. 2021</xref>).</p>
      <p>Amphibians possess permeable skin that is highly sensitive to temperature and humidity, and their life cycle is heavily reliant on freshwater bodies, with a strong preference for still-water habitats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Ray et al. 2016</xref>). Due to the high environmental sensitivity of both adults and larvae, amphibian diversity is often used as an indicator of ecosystem health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Greenberg et al. 2016</xref>). In island ecosystems, amphibians play a vital role in food webs and are essential for maintaining structural and functional stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Kiesecker et al. 2001</xref>). However, under pressure from climate change and human activities, amphibian habitats are disappearing at an accelerating rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Mushet et al. 2014</xref>), and populations are undergoing rapid declines, making them one of the most threatened groups of vertebrates worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Pimm et al. 2014</xref>). This crisis is especially acute in island ecosystems, where geographic isolation and limited resource availability exacerbate vulnerability to habitat fragmentation and anthropogenic disturbances (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Nelson et al. 2021</xref>). Rapid urbanization along the East Asian coast has led to large-scale fragmentation of pristine habitats, affecting amphibian survival through multiple pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Lehtomäki et al. 2019</xref>): the loss of freshwater bodies due to construction encroachment and the further fragmentation of dispersal corridors by road networks on islands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li et al. 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Zevgolis et al. 2023</xref>).</p>
      <p>Research on biodiversity in the coastal islands of eastern China has established a preliminary foundation. As demonstrated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chen et al. (2022)</xref>, amphibian diversity in the Zhoushan Archipelago is closely correlated with island area, habitat heterogeneity, and species traits. The coastal islands of southern Zhejiang, located in a subtropical monsoon climate zone significantly influenced by the East Asian monsoon, are predominantly bedrock islands and form an ecological transition zone where terrestrial and marine ecosystems intersect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Li 2015</xref>). However, these islands are under considerable pressure from human development. Current understanding of the impacts of human activities and island characteristics on amphibian populations remains insufficient, hindering accurate assessment of their conservation status and the formulation of targeted protection strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Capinha et al. 2020</xref>). Investigating the factors influencing amphibian diversity in this region can elucidate how island ecosystems respond to both geographic features and anthropogenic disturbances, thereby providing a scientific basis for the planning and management of protected areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Gao and Wang 2022</xref>).</p>
      <p>Island datasets with small sample sizes often exhibit high dimensionality and nonlinear characteristics, making conventional statistical models such as linear regression inadequate for handling collinearity among variables (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Lavery et al. 2019</xref>). Machine learning models offer a powerful approach to advancing island biogeographic research, as they can quantitatively reveal the complex and nonlinear effects of geographic features and anthropogenic disturbances in shaping biodiversity patterns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Garroutte et al. 2018</xref>). Through techniques such as feature importance evaluation, decision boundary analysis, and similarity-based instance comparisons, these models help quantify the relative contributions and functional pathways of specific variables in influencing species distribution mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Garcia-Quintas et al. 2023</xref>), diversity, and community structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">López-de Sancha et al. 2025</xref>). This provides novel insights for unraveling the drivers of island biodiversity.</p>
      <p>Through field ecological surveys, this study comprehensively documented the species composition and population sizes of amphibians on major coastal islands of southern Zhejiang and assessed their diversity. Cluster analysis and redundancy analysis were employed to examine the response of amphibian community structure to island characteristics and land cover types. Machine learning models were further applied to identify the dominant factors influencing amphibian diversity. The Shapley Additive exPlanations (<abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev>) method was applied as an interpretability tool to quantify the nonlinear effects, contribution direction, and relative strength of island geographic features on diversity indices, thereby clarifying the roles of island area and isolation. By adopting interpretable tree-based algorithms, this study provides valuable insights for understanding ecosystem vulnerability in island settings, predicting species responses and formulating targeted conservation strategies.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec3">
      <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="Data acquisition" id="sec4">
        <title>Data acquisition</title>
        <p>From October 2021 to July 2025, a comprehensive survey of amphibian fauna was conducted on 36 coastal islands in southern Zhejiang (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>), including Dongtou Island, Banping Island, and other islands. The survey period covered both breeding and non-breeding seasons of amphibians. Geographic information for the surveyed islands is provided in Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table SS1. A combination of transect and point-count methods was applied. Based on the habitat features of the islands and the ecology of local amphibians, 54 transects and 20 observation points were established in total. Throughout the study, amphibians representing nine species, five families, and one order were recorded. A complete species list is available in Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table SS2. Land cover data were obtained from the China Land Cover Dataset (<abbrev xlink:title="China Land Cover Dataset">CLCD</abbrev>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Yang and Huang 2021</xref>), which includes nine major land cover types: cropland, forest, shrubland, grassland, water, snow/ice, barren land, impervious surfaces, and wetland. With a spatial resolution of 30 m, the dataset fully covers the coastal islands of southern Zhejiang.</p>
        <fig id="F1">
          <object-id content-type="arpha">3AE954C2-1953-59F9-A070-7B4C696C7D06</object-id>
          <label>Figure 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Distribution map of 36 coastal islands in southern Zhejiang.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="nature_conservation-64-059_article-183777__-g001.jpg" id="oo_1670948.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1670948</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Diversity indicators" id="sec5">
        <title>Diversity indicators</title>
        <p>In this study, species relative abundance (<italic>R</italic>) was used to identify dominant amphibian species, while alpha diversity was assessed using the Shannon-Wiener index (<italic>H</italic>’), the Simpson index (<italic>D</italic>), and the Pielou evenness index (<italic>J</italic>) to characterize species diversity within the amphibian communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Strong 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Thukral 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Magurran 2021</xref>). The corresponding formulas are as follows:</p>
        <p><mml:math id="M1"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:math>
	(1)</p>
        <p><mml:math id="M2"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>′</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>ln</mml:mi><mml:mo>⁡</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>	(2)</p>
        <p><mml:math id="M3"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math>	(3)</p>
        <p><mml:math id="M4"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:msup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>′</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln</mml:mi><mml:mo>⁡</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>′</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:math>	(4)</p>
        <p>where <italic>N<sub>i</sub></italic> represents the number of individuals of species <italic>i</italic>, and <italic>N</italic> is the total number of individuals of all species. A species is classified as dominant if <italic>R</italic> &gt; 0.05, as common if 0.005 &lt; <italic>R</italic> ≤ 0.05, and as rare or occasional if <italic>R</italic> ≤ 0.005. Here, <italic>P<sub>i</sub></italic> denotes the proportion of individuals belonging to the <italic>i</italic>th species, and <italic>S</italic> refers to the total number of species.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Modeling methods and evaluation indicators" id="sec6">
        <title>Modeling methods and evaluation indicators</title>
        <p>In this study, multiple machine learning algorithms, including eXtreme gradient boosting (<abbrev xlink:title="eXtreme gradient boosting">XGB</abbrev>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Grekousis 2025</xref>), support vector machines (<abbrev xlink:title="support vector machines">SVM</abbrev>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Pouteau et al. 2012</xref>), K-nearest neighbors (<abbrev xlink:title="K-nearest neighbors">KNN</abbrev>), and linear regression (<abbrev xlink:title="linear regression">LR</abbrev>), were employed to model and predict the relationships between island geographic features and biodiversity. The explanatory variables considered were distance to the nearest mainland (<abbrev xlink:title="distance to the nearest mainland">MID</abbrev>), land area (<abbrev xlink:title="analysis identified land area">ARE</abbrev>), maximum elevation (<abbrev xlink:title="maximum elevation">ALT</abbrev>), coastline length (<abbrev xlink:title="coastline length">COAS</abbrev>), shape index (<abbrev xlink:title="shape index">SAI</abbrev>), and settlement presence (<abbrev xlink:title="settlement presence">SETT</abbrev>). The formula for calculating <abbrev xlink:title="shape index">SAI</abbrev> is as follows:</p>
        <p><mml:math id="M5"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>SAI</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>COAS</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>ARE</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mi>π</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:math>	(5)</p>
        <p>The biodiversity response variables selected were the Shannon-Wiener index (<italic>H</italic>’), Simpson index (<italic>D</italic>), and Pielou evenness index (<italic>J</italic>). Model performance was evaluated using the mean squared error (<abbrev xlink:title="mean squared error">MSE</abbrev>) and adjusted <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup>, with the optimal model selected based on these regression metrics:</p>
        <p><mml:math id="M6"><mml:mtext> MSE </mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:math>	(6)</p>
        <p><mml:math id="M7"><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:math>	(7)</p>
        <p>where <italic>y</italic><sub>i</sub> represents the true value, <mml:math id="M8"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math> denotes the predicted value, <italic>y</italic>̄ is the mean of the observed values, <italic>n</italic> is the sample size, and <italic>p</italic> is the number of features. A lower <abbrev xlink:title="mean squared error">MSE</abbrev> value indicates smaller fitting and prediction errors of the model. The <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> value ranges from 0 to 1, with values closer to 1 indicating a greater proportion of variance explained by the model and better stability in performance.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Data analysis" id="sec7">
        <title>Data analysis</title>
        <p>Spearman correlation analysis was employed to assess the co-occurrence and associations among amphibian species across the islands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Gotelli and McCabe 2002</xref>). The calculation formula is as follows:</p>
        <p><mml:math id="M9"><mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6</mml:mn><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:math>	(8)</p>
        <p>where <italic>d<sub>i</sub></italic> represents the difference in rank of the <italic>i</italic>th species, and <italic>n</italic> denotes the number of islands.</p>
        <p>Cluster analysis in conjunction with the elbow method was applied to examine similarity in amphibian community composition among islands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Rousseeuw 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">McKenna Jr 2003</xref>). Detrended correspondence analysis (<abbrev xlink:title="Detrended correspondence analysis">DCA</abbrev>) was first conducted on the species distribution matrix. Based on the maximum gradient length of the <abbrev xlink:title="Detrended correspondence analysis">DCA</abbrev> axes, redundancy analysis (<abbrev xlink:title="redundancy analysis">RDA</abbrev>) was used if the value was less than 3, canonical correspondence analysis (<abbrev xlink:title="canonical correspondence analysis">CCA</abbrev>) was selected if it was greater than 4, and either <abbrev xlink:title="redundancy analysis">RDA</abbrev> or <abbrev xlink:title="canonical correspondence analysis">CCA</abbrev> could be appropriately applied if it was between 3 and 4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Palmer et al. 2008</xref>). In this study, as the maximum gradient length of all <abbrev xlink:title="Detrended correspondence analysis">DCA</abbrev> axes for island geographic characteristics and land cover types was below 3, <abbrev xlink:title="redundancy analysis">RDA</abbrev> was chosen to evaluate the effects of geographic features and land cover proportions on amphibian community composition.</p>
        <p>To address potential multicollinearity among island geographic variables and land cover proportions, which could distort model outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Dastres et al. 2025</xref>), variance inflation factor (<abbrev xlink:title="variance inflation factor">VIF</abbrev>) analysis was used to quantify variable autocorrelation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Akinwande et al. 2015</xref>). Only variables with <abbrev xlink:title="variance inflation factor">VIF</abbrev> values less than 10 were retained in the model. The categorical variable indicating the presence of settlement on islands was processed using one-hot encoding for appropriate feature representation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Enireddy et al. 2022</xref>).</p>
        <p>To elucidate the specific influence of island geographic characteristics on amphibian species diversity, the optimal predictive model was interpreted using the <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Mo et al. 2023</xref>). This approach quantifies the contribution of each geographic feature to model predictions. The <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> value is computed as follows:</p>
        <p><mml:math id="M10"><mml:msub><mml:mi>∅</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>⊆</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>"</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>"</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>!</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>"</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>"</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>"</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>"</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>!</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>"</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>"</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>!</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>∪</mml:mo><mml:mo fence="false">{</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo fence="false">}</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:math>	(9)</p>
        <p>where Ø<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> denotes the <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> value for feature <italic>i</italic>, <italic>N</italic> is the complete set of features, <italic>S</italic> represents any subset of features excluding <italic>i</italic>, |<italic>S</italic>| indicates the number of features in subset <italic>S</italic>, <italic>v</italic>(<italic>S</italic>) denotes the model output using feature subset <italic>S</italic>, and <italic>v</italic>(<italic>S</italic> U {<italic>i</italic>}) is the model output when feature <italic>i</italic> is included. A positive <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> value indicates a positive effect of the geographic feature on biodiversity prediction, whereas a negative value suggests an inhibitory effect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Wang et al. 2024</xref>).</p>
        <p>Candidate thresholds for <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> values were generated using percentiles ranging from the 10th to the 90th percentile, in 5% increments. For each candidate threshold, a Mann-Whitney <italic>U</italic> test was performed to evaluate statistical significance. The threshold with the smallest <italic>P</italic>-value, i.e., the most statistically significant, was selected as the final cutoff (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Qiao et al. 2025</xref>). The <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> method not only quantifies the overall magnitude of influence exerted by island geographic features but also provides a detailed, island-specific interpretation of how each geographic characteristic affects biodiversity.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="sec8">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec sec-type="Island amphibian diversity pattern" id="sec9">
        <title>Island amphibian diversity pattern</title>
        <p>A total of 21 islands in the coastal area of southern Zhejiang, including Lingkun Island, Damen Island, and Dongtou Island, were observed to host two or more amphibian species. Among these, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Duttaphrynus">Duttaphrynus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="melanostictus">melanostictus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Schneider, 1799) (S2), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Fejervarya">Fejervarya</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="multistriata">multistriata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Hallowell, 1860) (S4) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Hylarana">Hylarana</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="guentheri">guentheri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Boulenger, 1882) (S6) were identified as the dominant species, with relative abundances of 0.371, 0.327 and 0.177, respectively (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). The highest <italic>H</italic>’ values were recorded on Dongtou Island (1.60), Damen Island (1.48), Lingkun Island (1.43), and Nanji Island (1.39) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>).</p>
        <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Species relative abundance of amphibians along the southern coast of Zhejiang. <italic>R</italic>: relative abundance.</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Family</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Species</bold>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <italic>R</italic>
                  </bold>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">S1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name>
                    <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Bufonidae">Bufonidae</tp:taxon-name-part>
                  </tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Bufo">Bufo</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="gargarizans">gargarizans</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Cantor, 1842)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.045</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">S2</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name>
                    <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Bufonidae">Bufonidae</tp:taxon-name-part>
                  </tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Duttaphrynus">Duttaphrynus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="melanostictus">melanostictus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Schneider, 1799)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.371</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">S3</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name>
                    <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Microhylidae">Microhylidae</tp:taxon-name-part>
                  </tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Microhyla">Microhyla</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="fissipes">fissipes</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Boulenger, 1884)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.033</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">S4</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name>
                    <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Dicroglossidae">Dicroglossidae</tp:taxon-name-part>
                  </tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Fejervarya">Fejervarya</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="multistriata">multistriata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Hallowell, 1860)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.327</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">S5</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name>
                    <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Dicroglossidae">Dicroglossidae</tp:taxon-name-part>
                  </tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Quasipaa">Quasipaa</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="spinosa">spinosa</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (David, 1875)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.002</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">S6</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name>
                    <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Ranidae">Ranidae</tp:taxon-name-part>
                  </tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Hylarana">Hylarana</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="guentheri">guentheri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Boulenger, 1882)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.177</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">S7</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name>
                    <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Ranidae">Ranidae</tp:taxon-name-part>
                  </tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Hylarana">Hylarana</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="latouchii">latouchii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Boulenger, 1899)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.004</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">S8</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name>
                    <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Ranidae">Ranidae</tp:taxon-name-part>
                  </tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Pelophylax">Pelophylax</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="nigromaculatus">nigromaculatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Hallowell, 1860)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.018</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">S9</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <tp:taxon-name>
                    <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Rhacophoridae">Rhacophoridae</tp:taxon-name-part>
                  </tp:taxon-name>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Polypedates">Polypedates</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="megacephalus">megacephalus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Hallowell, 1861)</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.022</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Species richness of amphibians on different islands offshore of Wenzhou.</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Island number</th>
                <th rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <italic>H'</italic>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <italic>D</italic>
                </th>
                <th rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <italic>J</italic>
                </th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <th rowspan="1" colspan="1">No.</th>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.03</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.62</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.93</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">3</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.48</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.71</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.82</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">4</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.94</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.48</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.68</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">5</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">6</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">7</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.43</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.71</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.80</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">8</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.27</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.70</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.92</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">9</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.01</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.62</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.92</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">10</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.60</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.78</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.89</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">11</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.86</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.50</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.78</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">12</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.29</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.15</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.41</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">13</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">14</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.64</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.44</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.92</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">15</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">16</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.64</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.44</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.92</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">17</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">18</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.04</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.60</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.75</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">19</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.93</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.54</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.84</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">20</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.88</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.53</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.80</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">21</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.64</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.44</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.92</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">22</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">23</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.10</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.67</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">24</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">25</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">26</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">27</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">28</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.50</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.26</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.46</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">29</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">30</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.67</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.48</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.97</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">31</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">32</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.39</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.71</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.86</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">33</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.69</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.50</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">34</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">35</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.00</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">36</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.64</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.44</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.92</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Dominant and common amphibian species on these islands share similar ecological environments (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). The distribution of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Duttaphrynus">Duttaphrynus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="melanostictus">melanostictus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (S2) showed significant correlations with those of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Fejervarya">Fejervarya</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="multistriata">multistriata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (S4) and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Hylarana">Hylarana</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="guentheri">guentheri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (S6), with correlation coefficients of 0.65 and 0.72, respectively (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). A strong correlation of 0.82 (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) was also observed between the distributions of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Fejervarya">Fejervarya</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="multistriata">multistriata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Hylarana">Hylarana</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="guentheri">guentheri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
        <fig id="F2">
          <object-id content-type="arpha">0ED0CF88-E4E8-542A-908F-A4E67306369C</object-id>
          <label>Figure 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Similarity of amphibian species distribution on islands near the southern coast of Zhejiang. The color bar displays the strength of interspecies correlations, ranging from −1 to 1. Asterisks indicate the significance of the correlations as follows: ***: <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001, **: <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.01, *: <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="nature_conservation-64-059_article-183777__-g002.jpg" id="oo_1670949.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1670949</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Similarity of island amphibian community composition and influencing factors" id="sec10">
        <title>Similarity of island amphibian community composition and influencing factors</title>
        <p>The elbow method indicated that the amphibian compositions of the islands in southern Zhejiang could be clustered into two distinct groups (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S1). Islands including Lingkun, Damen, Dongtou, Niyu, Beiji, and Luxi shared similar amphibian community structures (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). The <abbrev xlink:title="variance inflation factor">VIF</abbrev> value for <abbrev xlink:title="coastline length">COAS</abbrev> was 65.39, indicating potential strong collinearity with other island features. After removing this variable, the <abbrev xlink:title="variance inflation factor">VIF</abbrev> values of all remaining geographic features were below 10 (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table S3), confirming the absence of multicollinearity, and these variables were therefore retained as explanatory factors in the model.</p>
        <fig id="F3">
          <object-id content-type="arpha">B99D72AA-4AEB-508D-A7C7-2A9DFA3D7996</object-id>
          <label>Figure 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Results of clustering of island species. The numbers refer to the island numbers. <bold>A</bold>. Cluster analysis of the composition of island species. Ellipses represent 95% confidence intervals; <bold>B</bold>. Hierarchical clustering diagram, with red boxes representing the two main island groups.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="nature_conservation-64-059_article-183777__-g003.jpg" id="oo_1670950.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1670950</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>When island geographic features were considered influencing factors, the environmental variables significantly explained the variation in amphibian community structure (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). Variation partitioning analysis showed that geographic features accounted for 43.2% of the total explained variance, highlighting their role as major drivers of community variation (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S2). Among these, <abbrev xlink:title="distance to the nearest mainland">MID</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="settlement presence">SETT</abbrev> exerted significant effects on community differentiation (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table S4).</p>
        <p>For the <abbrev xlink:title="redundancy analysis">RDA</abbrev> analysis with land cover type proportions as predictors, impervious surface cover was excluded due to perfect collinearity. The remaining land cover variables showed no multicollinearity (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table S5) and significantly explained the differences in amphibian community structure (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S3). Both water coverage and farmland coverage ratio had significant impacts on the amphibian communities (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05; Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: table S6), with land cover types collectively explaining 30.8% of the variance (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S3).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Model comparison and selection" id="sec11">
        <title>Model comparison and selection</title>
        <p>The <abbrev xlink:title="eXtreme gradient boosting">XGB</abbrev> model achieved the highest goodness of fit for <italic>H</italic>', <italic>D</italic>, and <italic>J</italic>, with mean <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> values of 0.97, 0.95, and 0.95, respectively. When the <abbrev xlink:title="eXtreme gradient boosting">XGB</abbrev> model was selected, it exhibited lower prediction error and greater stability in cross-validation compared to other models. The predictive performance, expressed as <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> values, was 0.42 ± 0.07 for <italic>H</italic>', 0.38 ± 0.07 for <italic>D</italic>, and 0.27 ± 0.07 for <italic>J</italic>, respectively (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S4).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Analysis of factors influencing diversity" id="sec12">
        <title>Analysis of factors influencing diversity</title>
        <p><abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> analysis revealed that, among the island geographic features influencing the diversity index <italic>H’</italic> in the coastal islands of southern Zhejiang, the predictive importance ranking was as follows: <abbrev xlink:title="analysis identified land area">ARE</abbrev>, SETT_0, <abbrev xlink:title="shape index">SAI</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="distance to the nearest mainland">MID</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="maximum elevation">ALT</abbrev>, and SETT_1 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). The direction of influence varied across features: high <abbrev xlink:title="analysis identified land area">ARE</abbrev> and high <abbrev xlink:title="shape index">SAI</abbrev> both exhibited positive effects on the diversity indices <italic>H’</italic>, <italic>D</italic>, and <italic>J</italic>, whereas an increase in <abbrev xlink:title="distance to the nearest mainland">MID</abbrev> showed inhibitory effects on all three. <abbrev xlink:title="maximum elevation">ALT</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="settlement presence">SETT</abbrev> had the smallest impact on diversity predictions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F4">
          <object-id content-type="arpha">2D0DDBE4-E57E-52D1-9394-EFF266DDF4FE</object-id>
          <label>Figure 4.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>The geographic features of each island used to fit the <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> values and their importance ranking for <italic>H</italic>', <italic>D</italic>, and <italic>J</italic> for all islands. <abbrev xlink:title="distance to the nearest mainland">MID</abbrev>: distance to the nearest mainland; <abbrev xlink:title="analysis identified land area">ARE</abbrev>: land area; <abbrev xlink:title="maximum elevation">ALT</abbrev>: maximum elevation; <abbrev xlink:title="shape index">SAI</abbrev>: shape index; SETT_1: islands with settlements; SETT_0: islands without settlements.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="nature_conservation-64-059_article-183777__-g004.jpg" id="oo_1670951.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1670951</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Given the consistent model performance and superior predictive accuracy for <italic>H</italic>', further <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> analysis was conducted for Type II islands to assess feature impacts in detail, including Lingkun, Damen, Dongtou, Niyu, Luxi, and Beiji. <abbrev xlink:title="analysis identified land area">ARE</abbrev> strongly promoted <italic>H’</italic> on the largest islands, namely Lingkun, Damen, and Dongtou, with <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> values of 0.57, 0.52, and 0.52, respectively (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). In contrast, <abbrev xlink:title="distance to the nearest mainland">MID</abbrev> exerted inhibitory effects on <italic>H’</italic> for Beiji Island and Luxi Island, with <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> values of −0.2 and −0.01, respectively (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F5">
          <object-id content-type="arpha">690BB8A3-9A98-58E6-807B-8C6408D3B2B6</object-id>
          <label>Figure 5.</label>
          <caption>
            <p><abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> values of diversity index <italic>H’</italic> predicted for various geographic features of Class II islands, where <italic>f</italic>(<italic>x</italic>) is the model fitting value and <italic>E</italic>[<italic>f</italic>(<italic>x</italic>)] is the expected value of diversity index <italic>H’</italic> for all islands. Class II islands include Damen (Island #3), Luxi (Island #4), Lingkun (Island #7), Niyu (Island #8), Dongtou (Island #10), and Beiji (Island #28). <abbrev xlink:title="distance to the nearest mainland">MID</abbrev>: distance to the nearest mainland; <abbrev xlink:title="analysis identified land area">ARE</abbrev>: land area; <abbrev xlink:title="maximum elevation">ALT</abbrev>: maximum elevation altitude; <abbrev xlink:title="shape index">SAI</abbrev>: shape index; SETT_1: islands with settlements; SETT_0: islands without settlements.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="nature_conservation-64-059_article-183777__-g005.jpg" id="oo_1670952.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1670952</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p><abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> threshold analysis identified the following thresholds: <abbrev xlink:title="analysis identified land area">ARE</abbrev> at 0.18, <abbrev xlink:title="distance to the nearest mainland">MID</abbrev> at 23.88, <abbrev xlink:title="shape index">SAI</abbrev> at 2.20 (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05), and <abbrev xlink:title="maximum elevation">ALT</abbrev> at 82.90 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>). Significant differences in <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> values were observed before and after the thresholds for <abbrev xlink:title="analysis identified land area">ARE</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="distance to the nearest mainland">MID</abbrev>, and <abbrev xlink:title="maximum elevation">ALT</abbrev> (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05), while <abbrev xlink:title="shape index">SAI</abbrev> exhibited no significant effect. In addition, the larger the <abbrev xlink:title="distance to the nearest mainland">MID</abbrev>, the lower the <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> value of the islands in the group (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S5A, C). The <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> value on islands inhabited by humans was higher than that on uninhabited islands (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S5B, D).</p>
        <fig id="F6">
          <object-id content-type="arpha">0E36B499-1B2E-5139-AE4D-CB05630461D4</object-id>
          <label>Figure 6.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>The <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> threshold analysis for island features with continuous numerical values. When the island feature values exceed the threshold, the <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> value changes most significantly (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) for <abbrev xlink:title="analysis identified land area">ARE</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="distance to the nearest mainland">MID</abbrev>, and <abbrev xlink:title="maximum elevation">ALT</abbrev>. THR: threshold; LGM: low group mean; HGM: high group mean. <abbrev xlink:title="distance to the nearest mainland">MID</abbrev>: distance to the nearest mainland; <abbrev xlink:title="analysis identified land area">ARE</abbrev>: land area; <abbrev xlink:title="maximum elevation">ALT</abbrev>: maximum elevation altitude; <abbrev xlink:title="shape index">SAI</abbrev>: shape index; SETT_1: islands with settlements; SETT_0: islands without settlements.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="nature_conservation-64-059_article-183777__-g006.jpg" id="oo_1670953.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1670953</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="sec13">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <sec sec-type="Analysis of the diversity pattern of amphibians" id="sec14">
        <title>Analysis of the diversity pattern of amphibians</title>
        <p>Amphibians are widely distributed across the coastal islands of southern Zhejiang. This study documented a total of nine species from five families and one order. Cluster analysis classified the amphibian communities in this region into two distinct types. Type I communities are dominated by single or multiple combinations of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Duttaphrynus">Duttaphrynus</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="melanostictus">melanostictus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Fejervarya">Fejervarya</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="multistriata">multistriata</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Hylarana">Hylarana</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="guentheri">guentheri</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, with community structure primarily influenced by geographic features. Type II consists of six larger islands, including Damen Island and Luxi Island. These islands support amphibian communities also centered on the three dominant species, accompanied by secondary species, and their distribution shows strong correlations with human activities and island area.</p>
        <p>Dominant species exhibit considerable plasticity in adapting to environmental changes. With broad ecological niches, they efficiently utilize human-altered secondary habitats, including irrigation ditches, rice paddies, and artificial water bodies. Under disturbances such as road construction, settlement expansion, and agricultural development, amphibians exhibit behavioral adjustments, for example, shifting breeding phenology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Carter and Rudolf 2019</xref>) and switching habitats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Martínez-Abraín and Galán 2018</xref>), which help maintain population stability and mitigate effects on alpha diversity. This adaptability enables them to sustain niche dominance on islands experiencing moderate disturbance. However, the high spatial association among dominant amphibian species in southern Zhejiang contradicts the principle of competitive exclusion. This study proposes that their coexistence can be attributed to (1) habitat heterogeneity resulting from human activities such as farmland reclamation and artificial water body construction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen et al. 2024</xref>), which facilitates fine-scale spatial and resource niche partitioning among dominant species and reduces direct competition; and (2) temporal differentiation in resource use across different life history stages, indirectly mitigating interspecific competition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Gao et al. 2020</xref>).</p>
        <p>The low alpha diversity of amphibians on small islands in southern Zhejiang can be mainly explained by the following factors: (1) amphibians have limited dispersal capacity and high environmental dependence, resulting in more restricted distributions compared to other vertebrates; (2) human activities and urbanization pose severe threats to amphibian habitats. Island ecosystems are more susceptible to the combined effects of geographic constraints and anthropogenic disturbances than mainland areas; and (3) small islands consist largely of rocky substrates with low habitat heterogeneity. They lack natural water retention capacity, and bare rocks support low primary productivity, leading to limited food resources for amphibians.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="The interaction between island geographic features and human activities" id="sec15">
        <title>The interaction between island geographic features and human activities</title>
        <p>According to niche theory, environmental filtering is a major factor influencing differences in species composition within communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Kristiansen et al. 2012</xref>). This study demonstrates that island geographic features significantly affect both amphibian diversity and community structure (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). In particular, human settlement (<abbrev xlink:title="settlement presence">SETT</abbrev>) has a notable impact on community differentiation (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05), though its direct effect on alpha diversity is minimal. This seemingly counterintuitive result can be interpreted through the “species screening effect” (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Dettki et al. 1998</xref>). The amphibian communities in the study area exhibit a dual-mode response to human disturbance: as a strong environmental filter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Zhao et al. 2024</xref>), <abbrev xlink:title="settlement presence">SETT</abbrev> rapidly selects against specialist species dependent on pristine habitats, e.g., certain rhacophorid frogs, leading to community succession. Conversely, generalist species, owing to their high ecological plasticity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Náplavová et al. 2021</xref>), efficiently utilize human-altered habitats and maintain stable populations on islands with high and moderate levels of development. Competition among these species has not yet reached a level that results in competitive exclusion, and thus alpha diversity does not show a sharp decline. Nonetheless, at the regional scale, this process contributes to community homogenization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Montesinos et al. 2012</xref>).</p>
        <p>Islands that are larger, less isolated, and have diverse habitat types, e.g., Niyu Island, Dongtou Island, and Lingkun Island, retain a higher proportion of endemic species such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Polypedates">Polypedates</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="megacephalus">megacephalus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. In contrast, highly isolated islands such as Nanji Island support endemic aquatic frogs such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Hylarana">Hylarana</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="latouchii">latouchii</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Consequently, amphibian communities on islands are structured primarily through environmental filtering, which takes precedence over competitive exclusion. Since competitive processes among amphibians have not fully unfolded, changes in diversity lag behind community turnover, driving regional reassembly of amphibian communities on coastal islands.</p>
        <p><abbrev xlink:title="analysis identified land area">ARE</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="distance to the nearest mainland">MID</abbrev> are the primary geographic features influencing diversity (Suppl. material <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="S1">1</xref>: fig. S6). Larger islands provide diverse survival conditions and opportunities for adaptation, facilitate niche differentiation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lustenhouwer and Riddell 2025</xref>), and possess greater resource availability, thereby supporting higher species richness. <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> analysis indicates that amphibian diversity increases sharply when island area exceeds 0.18 km<sup>2</sup>, suggesting that this value may represent the minimum area threshold for maintaining diversity. Islands below this threshold fail to sustain essential static freshwater breeding habitats and food web integrity, leading to diversity collapse. This finding offers a reference for defining minimum area requirements in island ecological restoration. Furthermore, large islands often contain natural or artificial open water bodies such as reservoirs and streams, which provide improved conditions for amphibian reproduction and dispersal. Although larger islands are theoretically associated with higher amphibian diversity, high connectivity can conversely reduce diversity. For example, Lingkun Island, which is highly developed and experiences substantial human disturbance, demonstrates lower species diversity compared to other islands of similar size. The negative effects of human activities appear to override the positive effects typically associated with larger areas. Road construction on large islands may further diminish predicted species richness, weakening the expected species-area relationship. Currently, the constructed wetland park on Lingkun Island helps protect endemic species such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Polypedates">Polypedates</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="megacephalus">megacephalus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Pelophylax">Pelophylax</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="nigromaculatus">nigromaculatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
        <p><abbrev xlink:title="maximum elevation">ALT</abbrev> typically influences temperature and humidity, thereby creating distinct ecological niches. However, the coastal islands of southern Zhejiang are generally low in elevation, resulting in environmental gradients that are too narrow to trigger significant niche differentiation. <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> analysis confirms that <abbrev xlink:title="maximum elevation">ALT</abbrev> contributes minimally to alpha diversity, as the temperature variations associated with altitude differences fall well within the thermal tolerance range of local amphibians. The weak effect of <abbrev xlink:title="maximum elevation">ALT</abbrev> is overshadowed by the habitat heterogeneity driven primarily by <abbrev xlink:title="analysis identified land area">ARE</abbrev>. Larger islands encompass both higher elevation areas and lowland water bodies, suggesting that the distribution of freshwater habitats, rather than altitude itself, is the key driver of amphibian diversity.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Comparative analysis of models" id="sec16">
        <title>Comparative analysis of models</title>
        <p>Machine learning has become an important tool in biogeographical research and can be applied to predict species richness and diversity in designated areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Andermann et al. 2022</xref>). <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> can decompose complex “black box” model fitting or prediction results into the contribution values of each feature, and the introduction of this method provides convenience for understanding how input features affect species diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Riddley et al. 2025</xref>). This study used <abbrev xlink:title="eXtreme gradient boosting">XGB</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="support vector machines">SVM</abbrev>, <abbrev xlink:title="K-nearest neighbors">KNN</abbrev>, and <abbrev xlink:title="linear regression">LR</abbrev> as modeling methods to select the most suitable model to explain the diversity of amphibians in the coastal islands of southern Zhejiang and its relationship with geographic features. The <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> method was applied to further quantify the relationship between island geographic features and amphibian diversity. Due to the possible strong correlation between geographic features, <abbrev xlink:title="variance inflation factor">VIF</abbrev> analysis was used to analyze the autocorrelation of each geographic feature. The <abbrev xlink:title="variance inflation factor">VIF</abbrev> value of <abbrev xlink:title="coastline length">COAS</abbrev> was found to be too high and strongly correlated with <abbrev xlink:title="analysis identified land area">ARE</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="shape index">SAI</abbrev>. Therefore, to establish a prediction model, <abbrev xlink:title="coastline length">COAS</abbrev> needed to be removed.</p>
        <p>In the case of a small sample size, due to the strong impact of sampling methods on fitting and prediction results, 20 cross-validations were used to compare model performance, aiming to reduce the interference of randomness in the modeling process on prediction results. Through model fitting and cross-validation, <abbrev xlink:title="eXtreme gradient boosting">XGB</abbrev> was found to have better fitting and cross-validation results compared to other models. This is because <abbrev xlink:title="eXtreme gradient boosting">XGB</abbrev> introduces a regularization term, randomly samples smaller subdatasets from coastal islands, and independently trains decision trees to aggregate the prediction results of multiple weak learners to obtain the final output. This type of algorithm can effectively reduce the variance of the overall model and lower the risk of overfitting. In addition, compared to linear models, tree models can more clearly express the interaction between explanatory variables and response variables (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Gao and Wang 2023</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Conclusion" id="sec17">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>A comprehensive survey and model-based analysis of amphibian diversity was conducted on the coastal islands of southern Zhejiang, employing <abbrev xlink:title="SHapley Additive exPlanations">SHAP</abbrev> to elucidate the mechanistic roles of island geographic characteristics. The amphibian communities in this region exhibit a distinct disturbance-mediated pattern, with generalist species dominating through the utilization of human-altered secondary habitats. Geographic features form the foundational framework shaping amphibian diversity and community structure, among which island area and isolation are the primary drivers of species diversity. A critical area threshold of 0.18 km<sup>2</sup> was identified as essential for maintaining amphibian diversity on these coastal islands, providing valuable guidance for the planning of island ecological reserves. The study confirms that geographic characteristics define the theoretical capacity for amphibian species diversity on coastal islands, while human activities act as a filter within this framework, selecting and reorganizing species composition. Together, these factors determine the distribution patterns of amphibians on offshore islands. The core impact of human activities lies in their “screening” effect rather than outright extinction, leading to both homogenization and specialization of communities. Due to constraints in the temporal scope and methodology of the survey, this study focused exclusively on the effects of geographic features and land cover proportions on amphibian community structure, without incorporating the influence of climate change or stochastic events. Future research should integrate these factors to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the drivers affecting amphibian diversity.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>The authors thank all members who participated in the field investigation. The Wenzhou Forestry Technology Promotion and Wildlife Protection and Management Station provided funding support for the investigation through the Wenzhou Terrestrial Wild Vertebrate Resource Survey Project (2022–2024).</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Akinwande O, Dikko HG, Agboola S (2015) Variance inflation factor: as a condition for the inclusion of suppressor variable(s) in regression analysis. Open Journal of Statistics 5: 754–767. <ext-link xlink:href="10.4236/ojs.2015.57075" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2015.57075</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Andermann T, Antonelli A, Barrett RL, Silvestro D (2022) Estimating alpha, beta, and gamma diversity through deep learning. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 839407. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3389/fpls.2022.839407" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.839407</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Bickford D, Howard SD, Ng D, Sheridan JA (2010) Impacts of climate change on the amphibians and reptiles of Southeast Asia. Biodiversity and Conservation 19(4): 1043–1062. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s10531-010-9782-4" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9782-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Capinha C, Marcolin F, Reino L (2020) Human-induced globalization of insular herpetofaunas. Global Ecology and Biogeography 29(8): 1328–1349. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/geb.13109" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13109</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Carter SK, Rudolf V (2019) Shifts in phenological mean and synchrony interact to shape competitive outcomes. Ecology 100(11): e2826. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/ecy.2826" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2826</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Chen B, Xue DH, Li ZH, Jiang L, Tian Y, Zhu J, Jin X, Yang JJ, Huang CF, Liu JR, Liu H, Liu JF, He ZS (2024) Anthropogenic disturbances influenced the island effect on both taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity on subtropical islands, Pingtan, China. Plants-Basel 13(11): 1537. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/plants13111537" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13111537</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Chen DW, Zhan CX, Wang YP (2022) Do functional and phylogenetic nestedness follow the same mechanisms as taxonomic nestedness? Evidence from amphibians in the largest archipelago of China. Journal of Animal Ecology 91: 2424–2436. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/1365-2656.13824" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13824</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Dastres E, Esmaeili H, Edalat M (2025) Species distribution modeling of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Malva</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">neglecta</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Wallr. weed using ten different machine learning algorithms: an approach to site-specific weed management. European Journal of Agronomy 167: 127579. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.eja.2025.127579" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127579</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Dettki H, Edman M, Esseen P, Hedenas H, Jonsson BG, Kruys N, Moen J, Renhorn K (1998) Screening for species potentially sensitive to habitat fragmentation. Ecography 21(6): 649–652. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00559.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00559.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Enireddy V, Karthikeyan C, Babu DV (2022) OneHotEncoding and LSTM-based deep learning models for protein secondary structure prediction. Soft Computing 26(8): 3825–3836. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s00500-022-06783-9" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-06783-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Gao D, Perry G (2016) Detecting the small island effect and nestedness of herpetofauna of the West Indies. Ecology and Evolution 6(15): 5390–5403. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/ece3.2289" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2289</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Gao D, Wang YP (2023) A review of the small-island effect detection method advancement. Biodiversity Science 31: 23299. <ext-link xlink:href="10.17520/biods.2023299" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2023299</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Gao VD, Morley-Fletcher S, Maccari S, Vitaterna MH, Turek FW (2020) Resource competition shapes biological rhythms and promotes temporal niche differentiation in a community simulation. Ecology and Evolution 10(20): 11322–11334. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/ece3.6770" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6770</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Gao D, Wang YP (2022) A global synthesis of the small-island effect in amphibians and reptiles. Ecography 45(1): e5957. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/ecog.05957" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05957</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Garcia-Quintas A, Roy A, Barbraud C, Demarcq H, Denis D, Bertrand SL (2023) Machine and deep learning approaches to understand and predict habitat suitability for seabird breeding. Ecology and Evolution 13(9): e10549. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/ece3.10549" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10549</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Garroutte M, Huettmann F, Webb CO, Ickert-Bond SM (2018) Biogeographic and anthropogenic correlates of Aleutian Islands plant diversity: a machine-learning approach. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 56(5): 476–497. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/jse.12456" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12456</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Gotelli NJ, Mccabe DJ (2002) Species co-occurrence: A meta-analysis of J. M. Diamond’s Assembly Rules Model. Ecology 83(8): 2091–2096. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083%5B2091:scoama%5D2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2091:scoama]2.0.co;2</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Greenberg CH, Moorman CE, Raybuck AL, Sundol C, Keyser TL, Bush J, Simon DM, Warburton GS (2016) Reptile and amphibian response to oak regeneration treatments in productive southern Appalachian hardwood forest. Forest Ecology and Management 377: 139–149. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.023" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.023</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Grekousis G (2025) Geographical-XGBoost: a new ensemble model for spatially local regression based on gradient-boosted trees. Journal of Geographical Systems 27(2): 169–195. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s10109-025-00465-4" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-025-00465-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Lavery MR, Acharya P, Sivo SA, Xu LH (2019) Number of predictors and multicollinearity: what are their effects on error and bias in regression? Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 48(1): 27–38. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1080/03610918.2017.1371750" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2017.1371750</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Lehtomäki J, Kusumoto B, Shiono T, Tanaka T, Kubota Y, Moilanen A (2019) Spatial conservation prioritization for the East Asian islands. Diversity and Distributions 25(3): 414–429. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/ddi.12869" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12869</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Li B, Zhang W, Shu XX, Pei EL, Yuan X, Wang TH, Wang ZH (2018) Influence of breeding habitat characteristics and landscape heterogeneity on anuran species richness and abundance in urban parks of Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry &amp; Urban Greening 32: 56–63. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.017" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.017</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>Li H (2015) Brief Records of Wenzhou Islands. Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>López-de Sancha A, Benejam L, Boix D, Briggs L, Cuenca-Cambronero M, Davidson TA, De Meester L, Fahy JC, Lemmens P, Martin B, Mehner T, Oertli B, Rasmussen M, Greaves HM, Sayer C, Beklioglu M, Brys R, Brucet S (2025) Drivers of amphibian species richness in European ponds. Ecography 48(5): e7347. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/ecog.07347" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.07347</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>Kiesecker JM, Blaustein AR, Belden LK (2001) Complex causes of amphibian population declines. Nature 410(6829): 681–684. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/35070552" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/35070552</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Kristiansen T, Svenning J, Eiserhardt WL, Pedersen D, Brix H, Munch Kristiansen S, Knadel M, Grández C, Balslev H (2012) Environment versus dispersal in the assembly of western Amazonian palm communities. Journal of Biogeography 39(7): 1318–1332. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02689.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02689.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Lustenhouwer N, Riddell EA (2025) Range shifts as drivers of niche breadth and dispersal ability in wild populations. Journal of Animal Ecology 94(2): 175–178. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/1365-2656.14239" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.14239</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Magurran AE (2021) Measuring biological diversity. Current Biology 31(19): R1174–R1177. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.049" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.049</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Martínez-Abraín A, Galán P (2018) A test of the substitution-habitat hypothesis in amphibians. Conservation Biology 32(3): 725–730. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/cobi.13062" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13062</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>Matthews T, Rigal F, Kougioumoutzis K, Trigas P, Triantis K (2020) Unravelling the small-island effect through phylogenetic community ecology. Journal of Biogeography 47: 2341–2352. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/jbi.13940" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13940</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>Mckenna Jr JE (2003) An enhanced cluster analysis program with bootstrap significance testing for ecological community analysis. Environmental Modelling &amp; Software 18(3): 205–220. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/S1364-8152(02)00094-4" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(02)00094-4</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>Menegotto A, Rangel TF, Schrader J, Weigelt P, Kreft H (2020) A global test of the subsidized island biogeography hypothesis. Global Ecology and Biogeography 29(2): 320–330. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/geb.13032" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13032</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>Mo TX, Li SS, Li GD (2023) An interpretable machine learning model for predicting cavity water depth and cavity length based on XGBoost-SHAP. Journal of Hydroinformatics 25(4): 1488–1500. <ext-link xlink:href="10.2166/hydro.2023.050" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2023.050</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>Montesinos R, Da Silva HR, de Carvalho A (2012) The ‘island rule’ acting on anuran populations of the Southern Hemisphere. Biotropica 44(4): 506–511. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00835.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00835.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>Mushet DM, Neau JL, Euliss NH (2014) Modeling effects of conservation grassland losses on amphibian habitat. Biological Conservation 174: 93–100. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.biocon.2014.04.001" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.04.001</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Náplavová K, Beck T, Gáper J, Pyszko P, Gáperová S (2021) Synanthropic process evaluation (with factors affecting propensity to parasitism) and host range within genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ganoderma</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in Central Europe. Forests 12(11): 1437. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/f12111437" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/f12111437</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <mixed-citation>Nelson KR, Davies MM, Thomson HM, Lawn P, Kushneryk K, Brouard-John EK, Paleczny M, Helms S, Hawkes VC, Gerwing TG (2021) Population dynamics and methodological assessments from 15-year amphibian monitoring in Southern Gulf Islands. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 193(4): 216. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1007/s10661-021-09000-6" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09000-6</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <mixed-citation>Palmer MW, McGlinn DJ, Westerberg L, Milberg P (2008) Indices for detecting differences in species composition: some simplifications of RDA and CCA. Ecology 89(6): 1769–1771. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1890/07-0842.1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0842.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <mixed-citation>Pimm SL, Jenkins CN, Abell R, Brooks TM, Gittleman JL, Joppa LN, Raven PH, Roberts CM, Sexton JO (2014) The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344(6187): 1246752. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1126/science.1246752" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246752</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <mixed-citation>Pouteau R, Meyer JY, Taputuarai R, Stoll B (2012) Support vector machines to map rare native plants in Pacific forests. Ecological Informatics 9: 37–46. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.03.003" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.03.003</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <mixed-citation>Qiao B, Yang H, Cao XY, Zhou BR, Wang NA (2025) Driving mechanisms and threshold identification of landscape ecological risk: A nonlinear perspective. Ecological Indicators 173: 113342. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113342" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113342</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <mixed-citation>Ray AM, Gould WR, Hossack BR, Sepulveda AJ, Thoma DP, Patla DA, Daley R, Al-Chokhachy R (2016) Influence of climate drivers on colonization and extinction dynamics of wetland-dependent species. Ecosphere 7(7): e1409. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1002/ecs2.1409" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1409</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <mixed-citation>Riddley M, Hepp S, Hardeep F, Nayak A, Liu M, Xing X, Zhang H, Liao J (2025) Differential roles of deterministic and stochastic processes in structuring soil bacterial ecotypes. Nature Communications 16(1): 2337. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1038/s41467-025-57526-x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57526-x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <mixed-citation>Rousseeuw PJ (1987) Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 20: 53–65. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <mixed-citation>Strong WL (2016) Biased richness and evenness relationships within Shannon-Wiener index values. Ecological Indicators 67: 703–713. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.043" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.043</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <mixed-citation>Thukral AK (2017) A review on measurement of Alpha diversity in biology. Agricultural Research Journal 54: 1–10. <ext-link xlink:href="10.5958/2395-146X.2017.00001.1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5958/2395-146X.2017.00001.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <mixed-citation>Triantis KA, Vardinoyannis K, Tsolaki EP, Botsaris I, Lika K, Mylonas M (2006) Re-approaching the small island effect. Journal of Biogeography 33(5): 914–923. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01464.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01464.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B49">
        <mixed-citation>Wang H, Liang Q, Hancock JT, Khoshgoftaar TM (2024) Feature selection strategies: a comparative analysis of SHAP-value and importance-based methods. Journal of Big Data 11: 44. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1186/s40537-024-00905-w" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-024-00905-w</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B50">
        <mixed-citation>Whittaker RJ, Fernández-Palacios JM, Matthews TJ, Borregaard MK, Triantis KA (2017) Island biogeography: taking the long view of nature’s laboratories. Science 357(6354): eaam8326. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1126/science.aam8326" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam8326</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B51">
        <mixed-citation>Yan Y, Jarvie S, Zhang Q, Zhang S, Han P, Liu Q, Liu P (2021) Small patches are hotspots for biodiversity conservation in fragmented landscapes. Ecological Indicators 130: 108086. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108086" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108086</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B52">
        <mixed-citation>Yang J, Huang X (2021) The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019. Earth System Science Data 13(8): 3907–3925. <ext-link xlink:href="10.5281/zenodo.12779975" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12779975</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B53">
        <mixed-citation>Yu J, Li DD, Zhang Z, Guo S (2020) Species–area relationship and small-island effect of bryophytes in the Zhoushan Archipelago, China. Journal of Biogeography 47: 978–992. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1111/jbi.13790" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13790</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B54">
        <mixed-citation>Zevgolis YG, Kouris A, Christopoulos A (2023) Spatiotemporal patterns and road mortality hotspots of herpetofauna on a Mediterranean island. Diversity-Basel 15(4): 478. <ext-link xlink:href="10.3390/d15040478" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3390/d15040478</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B55">
        <mixed-citation>Zhao Y, Mendenhall CD, Matthews TJ, Wang D, Li W, Liu X, Tang S, Han P, Wei G, Kang Y, Wu C, Wang R, Zeng D, Frishkoff LO, Si X (2024) Land-use change interacts with island biogeography to alter bird community assembly. Proceedings, Biological sciences 291: 20232245. <ext-link xlink:href="10.1098/rspb.2023.2245" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.2245</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <sec sec-type="Additional information" id="sec18">
      <title>Additional information</title>
      <sec sec-type="Conflict of interest" id="sec19">
        <title>Conflict of interest</title>
        <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Ethical statement" id="sec20">
        <title>Ethical statement</title>
        <p>No animals were captured, handled, harmed, or experimentally manipulated during this study. Field surveys were conducted through non-invasive observation methods.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Artificial Intelligence (AI) use" id="sec21">
        <title>Artificial Intelligence (AI) use</title>
        <p>The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI.</p>
        <p>AI was used only to improve language and readability.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Funding" id="sec22">
        <title>Funding</title>
        <p>Wenzhou Terrestrial Wild Vertebrate Resource Survey Project (2022–2024).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Author contributions" id="sec23">
        <title>Author contributions</title>
        <p>W-Q: Conceptualization, Investigation, Data curation, Writing—review and editing; J-L: Writing—original draft, Methodology, Writing—review and editing; C-Q: Data curation, Formal analysis; L-X: Writing—original draft, Investigation; S-L: Methodology, Data curation, Resources, Validation; Y-Z: Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing—review and editing.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Data availability" id="sec24">
        <title>Data availability</title>
        <p>All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
      <title>Supplementary materials</title>
      <supplementary-material id="S1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/natureconservation.64.183777.suppl1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">962BE20A-BC46-5CCE-8493-2BAC87BDEA5F</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary material 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Supplementary tables S1–S6, figures S1–S5</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p>docx</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation note</label>
          <p>Analysis of amphibian diversity and its influencing factors in the coastal islands of Southern Zhejiang.</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="nature_conservation-64-059_article-183777__-s001.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1670954.docx">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1670954</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Wenlong Qi, Jianxiong Li, Cheng Qin, Lei Xie, Shuran Li, Yongpu Zhang</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
