"Member State";"Habitat types";"Threshold for favourable status FV (‘green’)";"Threshold for unfavourable-inadequate status U1 (‘yellow’)";"Threshold for unfavourable-bad status U2 (‘red’)";Explanations
Austria;All;"A-proportion ≥ 50% and C-proportion < 33.3%";"All other combinations";"C-proportion > 33.3% and A-proportion < 50%";"Assessment of conservation degrees of single plots"
"Wallonia (Belgium)";Forest;"All three criteria (structure, functions, regeneration) at biogeographical level FV";"At least one criterion at biogeographical level U1 and no criterion U2";"At least one criterion at biogeographical level U2";"Assessment of each feature of single plots → averaging all assessments of a feature at biogeographical level (C weighted more strongly: A = 1, B = 2 and C = 4) → FV < 1.5 < U1 < 2.5 < U2"
"Wallonia (Belgium)";Grassland;"No information";"No information";"No information";"Assessment of conservation degrees of single plots"
"Czech Republic";All;"< 10% of partial areas assessed as ‘less favourable’ and ‘unfavourable’";"10-25% of partial areas assessed as ‘less favourable’ and ‘unfavourable’";"> 25% of partial areas assessed as ‘less favourable’ and ‘unfavourable’";"Assessment of conservation degrees of single plots"
Denmark;All;"> 50% A-proportion and > 75% A+B-proportion (= C-proportion < 25% and A-proportion > 50%)";"All other combinations";"< 25% A-proportion and < 50% A+B-proportion (= C-proportion > 50% and A-proportion < 25%)";"Assessment of conservation degrees of single plots"
Germany;All;"C-proportion ≤ 20%";"C-proportion > 20 and ≤ 25%";"C-proportion > 25%";"Assessment of conservation degrees of single plots"
Hungary;All;"No information";"No information";"No information";"Assessment of conservation degrees of single plots. Naturalness-based habitat quality index (Németh and Seregélyes 1989)"
Ireland;All;"C-proportion < 1%";"C-proportion 1–25%";"C-proportion > 25%";"Assessment of conservation degrees of single plots"
Latvia;All;"No information";"No information";"No information";"Assessment of conservation degrees of single plots (no assessment if total area of habitat type decreases > 1% per year during one reporting period)"
Lithuania;All;"No information";"No information";"No information";"Assessment of conservation degree at Natura 2000 site level"
Netherlands;All;"If A-proportion ≥ 75% and C-proportion ≤ 15%";"All other combinations";"C-proportion > 25% and A < B + C";"Assessment of subparameter ‘structure and functions (without typical species)’ at Natura 2000 site level"
Netherlands;All;"Proportion of FV ≥ 75% and proportion of U2 ≤ 15%";"All other combinations";"Proportion of U2 > 25% and proportion of FV < proportion of (U1 + U2)";"Assessment of subparameter ‘typical species’ at biogeographical level in relation to proportion of species belonging to different species groups according to Red List"
Netherlands;All;"2 × FV";"At least 1 × U1";"At least 1 × U2";"Assessment of conservation status by aggregating assessments of subparameter ‘structure and functions (without typical species)’ and ‘typical species’ at biogeographical level according to EU evaluation matrix"
Romania;All;"C-proportion < 20% and A-proportion ≥ 50%";"All other combinations";"C-proportion ≥ 50% and A-proportion < 20%";"Assessment of conservation degrees of single plots"
Sweden;All;–;–;–;"Expert evaluation"