logo
HomeArticlesAbout
About PensoftBooksJournalsBlog
Register | Login
Response
Nature Conservation 37: 31-51
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.37.32741 (01 Oct 2019)
Other versions:
ABOUT PENSOFT
  • Company Profile
  • Innovations & Tools
  • Open Access & APC Policies
  • Terms of Use
  • Editorial Policies
PRODUCTS
  • Journals
  • Advanced Books
  • Conventional Books
  • Conference Abstracts
  • Conference Proceedings
SERVICES
  • For Authors
  • For Journals
  • For Books
  • For Conferences
  • For Organisations
PROJECTS
  • Research Projects
  • Services
  • Partners
  • Brochure
ARPHA
  • ARPHA Publishing Platform
  • ARPHA Manual
  • ARPHA Pricing
  • Web Services
GET IN TOUCH
  • Contacts
  • Publishing Inquiry
  • Migrate Your Journal
  • Open a New Journal
  • Follow PENSOFT
  • Blog & News Subscribe
  • Media Center
  • © Pensoft Publishers 2023
XML
PDF
cart
 
 
Twitter
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CitationCitation
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • FigsFigs
  • TaxaTaxa
  • DataData
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
  • Article title
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • The science of spotted owls and fire
  • Jones et al. (2016) tested the effects of high-severity fire on owls using a “natural” Before-After Control-Impact (BACI) design
  • Hanson et al. (2018): error-fraught criticisms of Jones et al. (2016)
  • Conclusions
  • References
  • Supplementary materials
Powered by

This website uses cookies in order to improve your web experience. Read our Cookies Policy

OK