logo
HomeArticlesAbout
About PensoftBooksJournalsBlog
Register | Login
Research Article
Nature Conservation 8: 45-75
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.8.5942 (09 Oct 2014)
Other versions:
ABOUT PENSOFT
  • Company Profile
  • Innovations & Tools
  • Open Access & APC Policies
  • Terms of Use
  • Editorial Policies
PRODUCTS
  • Journals
  • Advanced Books
  • Conventional Books
  • Conference Abstracts
  • Conference Proceedings
SERVICES
  • For Authors
  • For Journals
  • For Books
  • For Conferences
  • For Organisations
PROJECTS
  • Research Projects
  • Services
  • Partners
  • Brochure
ARPHA
  • ARPHA Publishing Platform
  • ARPHA Manual
  • ARPHA Pricing
  • Web Services
GET IN TOUCH
  • Contacts
  • Publishing Inquiry
  • Migrate Your Journal
  • Open a New Journal
  • Follow PENSOFT
  • Blog & News Subscribe
  • Media Center
  • © Pensoft Publishers 2023
XML
PDF
cart
 
 
Twitter
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CitationCitation
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • TabsTabs
  • TaxaTaxa
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
CrossRef
(9)
(9)
  • Norman W. H. Mason, Robert J. Holdaway, Sarah J. Richardson, Anne Chao (2018)
    Incorporating measurement error in testing for changes in biodiversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9: 1296. CrossRef DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12976
  • Ylva Uggla, Maria Forsberg, Stig Larsson (2016)
    Dissimilar framings of forest biodiversity preservation: Uncertainty and legal ambiguity as contributing factors. Forest Policy and Economics 62: 36. CrossRef DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.07.007
  • Guy Pe'er, Jean-Baptiste Mihoub, Claudia Dislich, Yiannis Matsinos (2014)
    Towards a different attitude to uncertainty. Nature Conservation 8: 95. CrossRef DOI: 10.3897/natureconservation.8.8388
  • Erica Ponzi, Lukas F. Keller, Stefanie Muff, Thomas Hansen (2019)
    The simulation extrapolation technique meets ecology and evolution: A general and intuitive method to account for measurement error. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10: 1734. CrossRef DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13255
  • Alexander Singer, Karin Johst, Thomas Banitz, Mike S. Fowler, Jürgen Groeneveld, Alvaro G. Gutiérrez, Florian Hartig, Rainer M. Krug, Matthias Liess, Glenn Matlack, Katrin M. Meyer, Guy Pe’er, Viktoriia Radchuk, Ana-Johanna Voinopol-Sassu, Justin M.J. Travis (2016)
    Community dynamics under environmental change: How can next generation mechanistic models improve projections of species distributions?. Ecological Modelling 326: 63. CrossRef DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.11.007
  • N. Georgiou, R.M. Morgan, J.C. French (2020)
    Conceptualising, evaluating and communicating uncertainty in forensic science: Identifying commonly used tools through an interdisciplinary configurative review. Science & Justice 60: 313. CrossRef DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2020.04.002
  • William Magnuson (2014)
    Uncertainty and the design of in-situ biodiversity-monitoring programs. Nature Conservation 8: 77. CrossRef DOI: 10.3897/natureconservation.8.5929
  • Jenny Schmidt, Jennifer Hauck (2018)
    Implementing green infrastructure policy in agricultural landscapes—scenarios for Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. Regional Environmental Change 18: 899. CrossRef DOI: 10.1007/s10113-017-1241-2
  • Yrjö Haila, Klaus Henle (2014)
    Uncertainty in biodiversity science, policy and management: a conceptual overview. Nature Conservation 8: 27. CrossRef DOI: 10.3897/natureconservation.8.5941
  • Powered by

    This website uses cookies in order to improve your web experience. Read our Cookies Policy

    OK