Related articles by
Applied Ecology
Other versions:
- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- FigsFigs
- TabsTabs
- TaxaTaxa
- DataData
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
- NanopubsNanopubs
Integrating video and genetic data to estimate annual age‐structured apparent survival of American black bears. Population Ecology 64: 300.
DOI: 10.1002/1438-390X.12122
Public conservation connection and support between ocean and terrestrial systems in the United States. PLOS ONE 19: e0307431.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307431
Mammalian predator and prey responses to recreation and land use across multiple scales provide limited support for the human shield hypothesis. Ecology and Evolution 13: .
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10464
Quantifying impacts of recreation on elk (Cervus canadensis) using novel modeling approaches. Ecosphere 15: .
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.4873
Human activities influence mule deer use of overpasses across multiple scales. The Journal of Wildlife Management 88: .
DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22560
Human impacts on mammals in and around a protected area before, during, and after COVID‐19 lockdowns. Conservation Science and Practice 4: .
DOI: 10.1111/csp2.12743
Mammal responses to human recreation depend on landscape context. PLOS ONE 19: e0300870.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300870
Understanding the role of traditional and user-created recreation data in the cumulative footprint of recreation. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 44: 100615.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2023.100615
Reptile responses to outdoor recreation in urban habitat fragments. Urban Ecosystems 27: 453.
DOI: 10.1007/s11252-023-01464-3
Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species. PLOS ONE 18: e0286131.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286131
Differential response of three large mammal species to human recreation in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, USA. Frontiers in Conservation Science 4: .
DOI: 10.3389/fcosc.2023.1234157
Visitor pressure in protected areas: Interactions between river tourists and freshwater pearl mussels in the Central European national park Šumava. Limnologica 98: 126046.
DOI: 10.1016/j.limno.2022.126046
Habitat visibility affects the behavioral response of a large herbivore to human disturbance in forest landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management 348: 119244.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119244
‘We’re managing a different river now’: a political ecology of nature-based recreation in the Dolores River Watershed. Tourism Geographies 25: 1384.
DOI: 10.1080/14616688.2023.2183249
Importance of private working lands for the conservation of neotropical birds on an urban-wilderness gradient. Global Ecology and Conservation 38: e02200.
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02200
Monitoring public engagement with nature using Google Trends. People and Nature 4: 1216.
DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10381
Visitor demographics, site‐type and activities determine the occurrence and severity of environmental impacts at nature‐based tourist destinations. Ecological Solutions and Evidence 4: .
DOI: 10.1002/2688-8319.12207
To litter or not to litter that is the question, or the impact of tourist litter pollution on the macrofauna. Applied Soil Ecology 190: 105022.
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105022
Unraveling the impact of dog‐friendly spaces on urban–wildland pumas and other wildlife. Wildlife Biology : .
DOI: 10.1002/wlb3.01290
Sustainability in whale-watching: A literature review and future research directions based on regenerative tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives 47: 101120.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101120
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories