logo
HomeArticlesAbout
About PensoftBooksJournalsBlog
Register | Login
Research Article
Nature Conservation 47: 235-270
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.47.73060 (25 Mar 2022)
Other versions:
ABOUT PENSOFT
  • Company Profile
  • Innovations & Tools
  • Open Access & APC Policies
  • Terms of Use
  • Editorial Policies
PRODUCTS
  • Journals
  • Advanced Books
  • Conventional Books
  • Conference Abstracts
  • Conference Proceedings
SERVICES
  • For Authors
  • For Journals
  • For Books
  • For Conferences
  • For Organisations
PROJECTS
  • Research Projects
  • Services
  • Partners
  • Brochure
ARPHA
  • ARPHA Publishing Platform
  • ARPHA Manual
  • ARPHA Pricing
  • Web Services
GET IN TOUCH
  • Contacts
  • Publishing Inquiry
  • Migrate Your Journal
  • Open a New Journal
  • Follow PENSOFT
  • Blog & News Subscribe
  • Media Center
  • © Pensoft Publishers 2023
XML
PDF
cart
 
 
Twitter
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CitationCitation
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • FigsFigs
  • TabsTabs
  • MapMap
  • TaxaTaxa
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
  • Article title
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Introduction
  • Methods
    • Study area
    • Camera trapping
    • Photo analysis
    • Mammal classification
  • Results
    • Which species are using the structures
    • How do the ratios of successful crossing through the structure (full crossings) and aversion to the structure (aversions) differ between species
      • Train underpasses
      • Road underpass
      • Water culvert underpasses
    • How much does the use of existing crossing structures by wildlife and humans vary during the course of the day
    • How does the daily frequency of use by wildlife relate to the daily frequency of human activity
      • Very low or no human co-use
      • Low human co-use
      • Moderate human co-use
      • High human co-use
      • Very high human co-use
  • Discussion
    • Use of existing crossing structures by wildlife: Species distribution and frequencies of use
      • Train underpasses
      • Road underpass
      • Water culverts
      • Species of special interest
      • Species rarely detected
    • Co-use of existing crossing structures by wildlife and humans
      • Very low or no human co-use
      • Low human co-use
      • Moderate human co-use
      • High human co-use
      • Very high human co-use
    • Limitations and future research needs
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Appendix 1
Powered by

This website uses cookies in order to improve your web experience. Read our Cookies Policy

OK