Research Article
Other versions:
- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CitationCitation
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- FigsFigs
- TabsTabs
- MapMap
- TaxaTaxa
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
-
Article title
-
Abstract
-
Keywords
-
Introduction
-
Methods
-
Study area
-
Camera trapping
-
Photo analysis
-
Mammal classification
-
-
Results
-
Which species are using the structures
-
How do the ratios of successful crossing through the structure (full crossings) and aversion to the structure (aversions) differ between species
-
Train underpasses
-
Road underpass
-
Water culvert underpasses
-
-
How much does the use of existing crossing structures by wildlife and humans vary during the course of the day
-
How does the daily frequency of use by wildlife relate to the daily frequency of human activity
-
Very low or no human co-use
-
Low human co-use
-
Moderate human co-use
-
High human co-use
-
Very high human co-use
-
-
-
Discussion
-
Use of existing crossing structures by wildlife: Species distribution and frequencies of use
-
Train underpasses
-
Road underpass
-
Water culverts
-
Species of special interest
-
Species rarely detected
-
-
Co-use of existing crossing structures by wildlife and humans
-
Very low or no human co-use
-
Low human co-use
-
Moderate human co-use
-
High human co-use
-
Very high human co-use
-
-
Limitations and future research needs
-
-
Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
References
-
Appendix 1