Review Article |
Corresponding author: Cornelia Sattler ( co.sattler@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Reinhard Klenke
© 2024 Cornelia Sattler, Julian Schrader, Marie-Luise Hüttner, Klaus Henle.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Sattler C, Schrader J, Hüttner M-L, Henle K (2024) Effects of management, habitat and landscape characteristics on biodiversity of orchard meadows in Central Europe: A brief review. Nature Conservation 55: 103-134. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.55.108688
|
Increasing agricultural intensification, combined with land transformation and fragmentation, poses significant threats to biodiversity. While extensively cultivated landscapes serve as vital refuges against biodiversity loss, they are modified by land abandonment and intensification. Orchard meadows in Central Europe represent traditional extensive land management systems, exhibiting high biodiversity. Comprising cultivated grasslands and scattered fruit trees, orchard meadows feature structures rich in different habitats supporting a diverse flora and fauna. However, their decreasing economic importance in recent decades has resulted in severe degradation or abandonment. Despite their importance for biodiversity conservation, there remains no comprehensive overview of orchard meadow biodiversity and management in Central Europe. This review aims to summarize existing knowledge on orchard meadows’ role in biodiversity conservation and the effects of management practices on habitat diversity and quality at both smaller (structure and microhabitats, local scale) and larger scales (surrounding landscape, regional scale). The first part focuses on orchard meadow biodiversity, including both plants and animals and their link to landscape-scale factors. Biodiversity in orchard meadows is predominantly affected by patch size, determining species richness and composition, and connectivity to neighbouring orchard meadows, influencing species migration and recolonization success. The second part evaluates management impacts, illustrating differences in the benefits of mowing versus grazing across taxonomic groups. An intermediate management intensity for orchard meadows determines their conservation value in terms of species composition, varying among different taxonomic groups. To prevent area loss and abandonment of orchard meadows, we advocate for political and public support, along with incentives for farmers to maintain their biodiversity.
Extensively cultivated landscapes, extensive grassland, grazing, habitat connectivity, mowing, patch size, scattered trees, species richness, Streuobstwiese, structural diversity, traditional orchard
Habitat loss and fragmentation are main drivers of biodiversity decline, affecting nearly all habitat types and species worldwide (
Only few organisms are adapted to intensively used agricultural landscapes, such as crop feeding insects or those adapted to high and continuing disturbance (
For conservation of farmland biodiversity, it is essential to maintain semi-natural habitats (
Orchard meadows are a combination of planted fruit trees in the overstory and extensively managed grassland in the understory (
Orchard meadows provide many important ecosystem services and functions, due to their multifaceted structure, the unique combination of two strata and the low to no external input of chemical substances (
Despite these apparent values for food provisioning and biodiversity conservation, since the mid-19th century, orchards have declined substantially in Europe (
Here, we set out to fill this gap by reviewing the literature and distil patterns and drivers of species diversity in orchards, the effects of management on structural diversity of orchards and on species composition and the dependence of species in orchards to landscape characteristics that are likely to change when orchards get lost and fragmented. As studies are scarce on biodiversity in orchards, our baseline assumption is that diversity patterns recorded from fragmented habitats and factors affecting diversity in extensively used grasslands are transferrable to orchards. However, it is not our intention to provide a comprehensive literature review on grassland as this has been done in detail by other authors in the past (e.g.,
We concentrate on Central Europe as this region has comparable biogeographical, climatic and economic conditions and has a long and shared history of cultivation of orchard meadows (
We conducted our literature search in English and German language. We searched across various databases, including the literature database of the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, literature references of the Federal Committee for Orchard Meadows of NABU, and searched in Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Our search included the following keywords ‘orchard meadows’, ‘orchard management’, ‘traditional orchards’, ‘grazing’, ‘pruning’, ‘mowing’, ‘landscape composition’ within the scope of ‘Central Europe’.
Because we encountered only a limited number of publications directly focused on the effects of orchard meadow management on biodiversity (totalling 20 publications), we broadened our scope to include studies related to recommendations for grassland management that could be used to understand biodiversity maintenance and change in orchard meadow systems. Our final dataset included 218 publications, which underwent thorough review (see Suppl. material
In this part, we discuss the effects of different spatial scales and surrounding landscape configuration on biodiversity in orchard meadows. To this end, we first look at the importance of microhabitats and vegetation structure within orchards. Most species have specific requirements on their environment and their presence may depend on the availability and quality of microhabitats. Next, we turn towards the local scale to discuss the effect of size of individual orchard meadows as well as their isolation to other orchards on their biodiversity. As orchards share many species with other habitat types, such as grasslands, fallow lands and forests, we will look at the structure and diversity of the surrounding landscapes, which also play an important role on the biodiversity in orchards. Finally, we explore the diversity across multiple orchards on a regional or national scale.
The high amounts of multifaceted habitats and structural diversity of orchards are important drivers of their species diversity (
Dead wood, from trees or branches, is important for hibernating insects and small mammals like garden dormouse (Eliomys quercinus) (
The heterogeneous habitat structure of orchard meadows favours specialist bird species like Eurasian hoopoe (Upupa epops), little owl (Athene noctua) and wryneck (Jynx torquilla), for which orchards are key habitats. Those species require both a structurally rich arboreal stratum for breeding (e.g., old trees with cavities) and open ground for foraging (
However, orchard meadows also support generalist species, which feed on a broader range of host plants. For example,
In addition to habitat structure, particularly dead wood, edaphic conditions also significantly affect the diversity of plants and animals in traditional orchard meadows. According to the nutrition indicator values of Central European plants (
The interplay of shadow and sun, influenced by the spatial distribution of trees and other structures (e.g., woodpiles, fences, and bowers), determines not only potential microhabitats for animals but also the composition of herbaceous plant communities (
How management will influence the flora of orchard meadows will be discussed in the second part of this review.
When comparing the structural diversity of extensively cultivated orchard meadows with intensified fruit plantations, on plantations mainly low-trunk fruit trees are cultivated as those are easier to farm due to their homogenised low-trunk and dense plantation (
Besides structural differences within orchard meadows, there are also large differences in species diversity and composition between orchard meadows in the same region. To understand these, we will now turn towards effects and drivers at local scale.
Orchard size and isolation from other similar habitats are important drivers of species diversity and composition. Core predictions for species diversity in habitat fragments, such as orchard meadows, can be derived from the Equilibrium Theory of Island Biogeography and metapopulation theory (
In line with these theories, it has been shown that the number of bird species and various insect groups (e.g., bees, wasps and their natural enemies) increases with patch size (
As expected, the abundance of solitary wrinkled wasps (Eumeninae) and bees increased with the size of the orchard. However, this was not the case for digger wasps of the family Sphecidae and the parasitisation rate also did not increase with area and connectivity, but depended only on the local and regional abundance of hosts (
Orchard meadows are usually of small size, e.g., ranging from 0.08 to 5.8 ha in southern Lower Saxony, Germany (
The number of studies testing the effects of area and isolation of orchard meadows on the composition and abundance of different taxonomic groups and species within a taxonomic group is still very limited. Clearly, more studies are required to fully understand the contrasting reactions that have been observed for some species and groups in the studies carried out so far. Also, we need more studies that allow derivations of minimum sizes of orchards for providing breeding sites and the longer-term persistence of populations, especially for threatened species and species for which orchard meadows belong to their favoured habitats.
The surrounding landscape can be an important driver for the community composition in orchard meadows (
Further, it is important to note that the effects of patch size and surrounding landscape composition can be tightly interlinked (see also above). Patch size, matrix quality and amount of suitable patches in the surroundings determine metapopulation dynamics and the survival of species in fragmented habitats (e.g.,
Here, we regard the lack of studies specifically targeting landscape effects on orchard diversity as the main hindrance to reach clear conclusions. However, such knowledge is of paramount importance to formulate effective conservation measures for orchards at landscape scale. Also, the link of landscape effects on species composition in orchards presents a promising avenue for future research. For instance, it is poorly understood whether orchard meadows with high structural diversity may support non-arboreal species with different traits than tree-less meadows and meadows in intensively used plantations that may only support species with limited trait diversity.
The regional scale describes species diversity across many different orchard meadows, such as in a region, state or country. At this scale, orchards are among the most biodiverse cultivated landscapes in Central Europe (
For birds, the numbers are similarly high. In Austria, about one third of the 200 species of regular breeding birds, and half of the 103 songbird species were recorded in orchard meadows (
A study by
Only few similar studies exist for Central European orchard meadows, all of them showing a high species richness for many taxonomic groups [see
The high species diversity at regional scale can be explained by different factors. Generally, it is important to note that there is no standard appearance among orchard meadows at local scale. Orchard meadows have different sizes, managements, fruit tree compositions, and environmental site conditions, e.g., soil properties and topographic location (e.g.,
However, it is important to note that only few studies assessed the overall species diversity at regional scale and especially across scale. More knowledge is needed to (i) gain better understanding of which taxa are particularly diverse in orchards locally and regionally and (ii) to compare diversity among regions and taxa. This knowledge is important to guide conservation actions in orchards and could potentially serve as a baseline for future monitoring of biodiversity changes in orchards over time. This is of high relevance, since the total area of orchard meadows has declined substantially in most regions of Central Europe since the 1950s (
The loss of orchard meadows and the reduction of their quality threatens the biodiversity of orchard meadows at the regional scale. This has been well documented for bird species that breed primarily in orchard meadows (
For plants, eutrophication of orchard meadows has led to a rather low species richness of plants across large parts of Franconia in Bavaria (
Extensive management of the under- and overstory is a major driver of the biodiversity of orchard meadows. In this part, we will review and discuss the effects of different management practices on species diversity in orchards. We provide recommendations on the management of orchard meadows for maintaining and increasing biodiversity.
In Central Europe, most open grasslands and scattered tree landscapes are artificial and maintained by people (
The intermediate disturbance hypothesis by
In general, too high intensification in the form of high fertilizer use (N fertilization >120 kg N ha-1: eutrophic) either intensive grazing and mowing (3–6 times a year) can lead to decreasing species diversity of grassland (
The understory of orchard meadows, which consists of grasses and herbs, can be managed through grazing, mowing, fertilization, mulching, or a combination of these methods. Each management form has specific effects on the plant community composition of the understory and likely also its fauna. It is important to note that orchard meadows can include dry, moderate, or wet grasslands, and nutrient poor or eutrophic grasslands (
Grazing mainly promotes species richness of grasses, whereas mowing increases richness of herbs (
Fertilization or mulching can be important for nutrients repatriation (
Schematic figure illustrating the effects of management intensification on species richness. The graph illustrates the potential effect of management intensity (from high over intermediate to abandonment/rewilding) on species richness in orchard meadows. As an example, the effect of mowing intensity on species richness is shown in a box.
Grazing can ensure that meadows remain structurally diverse by creating a mosaic of damaged and undamaged vegetation (
Timing of grazing can also highly influence the grassland community.
The intensity of grazing and thus the number of livestock is crucial when aiming at high biodiversity. Grazing intensity measured on sward height (
The management should aim towards a structurally diverse understory created by intermediate grazing intensity and meadow areas excluded for livestock to offer undisturbed areas for, e.g., breeding birds. However, if the whole meadow is grazed by livestock, a grazing break of 2–4 months should be included to create regeneration time for fauna inhabiting the understory (
Dung of livestock can be an important fertiliser and is also crucial for dung living and visiting organisms like several dipteran families (e.g., Syrphidae, Dolichopodidae, Muscidae) and dung beetles (e.g., Scarabaeidae, Geotrupidae) (
Veterinary medicine or their metabolites in dung of livestock negatively affects dung living insects (
When the understory of orchards is managed by mowing, the timing and frequency of mowing strongly determines vegetation structure. Ideally, plants should have reached seed maturity or be capable of vegetative propagation by the time of cutting. This will increase their chances of persistence and propagation under a mowing regime with a constant temporal sequence. Plant species not adapted to frequent mowing, either due to low build-up of energy reserves, damage before seed production or sudden change in microclimate, may not persist long-term under unfavourable mowing management. However, plant species with low competitive ability, such as slow growing species or those adapted to high disturbances, depend on regular clearing or removal of more competitive, fast-growing plants for their survival (
In orchard meadows, the type and structure of the understory has a strong effect on faunal diversity. Hence, mowing time and frequency also determines which animals persist and establish. For wild bees, early mowing that removes flower buds of spring flowers depletes important flowering resources, such as pollen and nectar (
Besides timing, the frequency of mowing is also crucial. Intermediate cut frequencies, such as twice a year, support high species richness of vascular plants (Fig.
To account for the diverging effects of different mowing schemes on different taxonomic groups, a spatial and temporal mosaic of mowing regimes could be implemented (
Example of a spatio-temporal mosaic mowing regime in an orchard in Rutesheim-Perouse, southern Germany. Photo: Klaus Henle.
To date, there are no studies comparing the combined effect of different management methods in orchard meadows. Similarly, most studies focus on management effects on plants, birds and pollinating insects, which makes it difficult to develop conservation strategies that also account for the needs of the wide range of species from other taxonomic groups or ecological guilds for which orchard meadows are important (
Orchard meadows that are neither grazed nor mowed and left fallow rewild and lose their typical structure of semi-open grasslands with scattered trees. Important habitats disappear, floral as well as faunal species richness decrease (
Intensification of orchard meadows towards fruit plantations is the opposing effect of abandonment. Intensification aims at increasing economic output by increasing external inputs like fertiliser and pesticides and by more intensive management like removing old and/or less productive trees. Permanent transition towards intensive grazing and/or high disturbance by mowing in combination with high nutrient input leads to a decrease of taxonomic and functional diversity of pollinating insects (e.g., species of Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera and Diptera) and orthopteran species as well as in alteration of vegetation communities toward highly competitive and disturbance-adapted species (
Similarly, accumulation of dung due to overstocking of livestock and mulching (cut vegetation left on the meadow) can lead to accumulation of nutrients and rotting processes. This in turn can lead to a change and homogenisation of the flora and vegetation structure in the longer term (
If extensive management like grazing or mowing with cut vegetation removed cannot be maintained, temporarily mulching twice a year seems to be a good option to conserve plant diversity and depress succession (
The diversity of microhabitats is a useful indicators for species richness as it is assumed that microhabitats such as dead wood, cavities and branch holes, correlate with the abundance and diversity of organisms living on and in trees (
Quality and quantity of microhabitats further depend on the tree species and tree associated properties, such as bark structure and trunk diameter.
The importance of different tree species and varieties is also shown by different susceptibility to diseases. Apple trees are affected by higher rates of fungal heart rot infestation. This, in turn, attracts high numbers of woodpeckers and consequently leads to higher numbers of woodpecker-cavities (
The species diversity of orchard meadows is very closely connected to the maintenance and management of the under- and overstory, which determines structural diversity. However, it is evident from the studies reviewed above that management recommendations depend on and differ among targeted taxa, and thus each may be detrimental for non-target taxa (
Similar to the understory, the maintenance of the overstory by extensive tree pruning leads to high numbers of microhabitats, which offers manifold ecological niches for different species. Management of trees prevent premature ageing. For the maintenance of orchard meadows adding young trees of different species and varieties are important. Similarly, dead wood, e.g., standing trees contain many microhabitats and are crucial for cavity users (
Grazing, mowing and tree maintenance are key management aspects for biodiversity in orchard meadows. However, there is no “silver-bullet strategy” for an optimal management regime that fits all taxa as it is highly dependent on the location and the targeted species groups. For instance, a mowing frequency of twice per year can already lead to a decrease of cicada species (
Compared to other livestock, cattle, with their unselective feeding behaviour, seem to have the best effect on plant, butterfly and bee diversity (
Mowing times should be adjusted to the surrounding landscapes (e.g., timing of mowing in the neighbouring landscape) to prevent synchronous mowing and maintain alternative areas for the fauna (
Further, traditional ecological knowledge about orchard meadows in a specific region can be very helpful in optimizing management regimes, as it has been verified by generations of farmers (
To conserve and halt the decline of orchard meadows in Central Europe, we argue that it is paramount to acknowledge their importance for biodiversity at a political, cultural and societal level. There is a need for a clear definition of orchard meadows to create a common term in Europe, which would make the assessment as well as their protection more straightforward (see
While we highlighted the important ecological role of orchard meadows in Central European landscapes (Table
1. Biodiversity in Orchard Meadows | Selected References |
---|---|
Orchard meadows are one of the most biodiverse agricultural habitats in Central Europe explained by their high structural diversity. (See chapter: Structure and microhabitats) |
|
Species richness in orchard meadows increases with patch size. (See chapter: Local scale: effects of patch size and isolation) |
|
Habitat surroundings, landscape composition and connectivity of orchard meadows determines species composition. (See chapters: Surrounding landscapes, regional scale) |
|
2. Management in Orchard Meadows | |
Extensive grazing and mowing promote structural diversity of the understory. (See chapter: Maintenance of structural diversity of the understory) |
|
Fertilization and intensive mowing or grazing leads to homogenisation of plant communities. (See chapter: Effects of abandonment and management intensification) |
|
Extensive tree management promotes animal species richness. (See chapter: Effects of extensive tree management on species richness) | ( |
Here, we will briefly outline future research directions.
Research gaps and directions:
We thank Dr. Markus Rösler, Naturschutzbund Deutschland, Gerlingen, Jennifer Krämer, Naturschutzbund Deutschland, Berlin, and Volker Scherfose, BfN, Bonn-Bad Godesberg, for constructive discussions and information on orchard meadows.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
This study was funded by The German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) (Project reference: FKZ 3520 83 0100).
CS and KH conceived the ideas. CS and MLH conducted literature research. CS wrote the main text of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.
Cornelia Sattler https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5779-2641
Julian Schrader https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8392-211X
Klaus Henle https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6647-5362
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.
Complete list of references
Data type: docx