Nature Conservation 1: 73–153, doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.1.2786
Dos and Don'ts for butterflies of the Habitats Directive of the European Union
Chris van Swaay 1,2, Sue Collins 1, Goran Dušej 3, Dirk Maes 1,4, Miguel López Munguira 1,5, Laszlo Rakosy 6, Nils Ryrholm 7, Martina Šašić 1,8, Josef Settele 1,9, Jeremy A. Thomas 10,11, Rudi Verovnik 1,12, Theo Verstrael 1,2, Martin Warren 1,13, Martin Wiemers 1,9,14, Irma Wynhoff 1,2
1 Butterfly Conservation Europe (BCE); P.O. Box 506, NL-6700 AM Wageningen, The Netherlands
2 De Vlinderstichting; P.O. Box 506, NL-6700 AM Wageningen, The Netherlands
3 Swiss Butterfly Conservation, Käsereistrasse 18, CH-8919 Rottenschwil, Switzerland
4 Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Kliniekstraat 25, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
5 Departamento de Biología, Edificio de Biología, c/Darwin No. 2, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, ES-28049 Madrid, Spain
6 Department of Taxonomy and Ecology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Clinicilor 5-7, 40006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
7 University of Gävle, Högskolan i Gävle, SE-80176 Gävle, Sweden
8 Croatian Natural History Museum, Demetrova 1, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
9 UFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Community Ecology, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, D-06120 Halle, Germany
10 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK
11 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK
12 University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Biology, Vecna pot 111, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
13 Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset BH20 5QP, UK
14 Department of Tropical Ecology and Animal Biodiversity, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Wien, Austria

Corresponding author: Chris van Swaay (chris.vanswaay@vlinderstichting.nl)

Academic editor: Klaus Henle

received 30 January 2012 | accepted 1 March 2012 | Published 14 March 2012


(C) 2012 Chris van Swaay. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.

Abstract

Twenty-nine butterfly species are listed on the Annexes of the Habitats Directive. To assist everyone who wants or needs to take action for one of these species, we compiled an overview of the habitat requirements and ecology of each species, as well as information on their conservation status in Europe. This was taken from the recent Red List and their main biogeographical regions (taken from the first reporting on Article 17 of the Directive). Most important are the Dos and Don'ts, which summarize in a few bullet points what to do and what to avoid in order to protect and conserve these butterflies and their habitats.

Keywords

Butterfly, Europe, European Union, Biodiversity, Natura 2000, Habitats Directive

Papilio alexanor. Photo: Tom Nygaard Kristensen.

Introduction

Since its introduction in 1994, the Habitats Directive (Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora) has become a fundamental and increasingly important way of implementing nature conservation in the European Union. It aims to protect some 220 habitats and approximately 1, 000 species listed in the Directive’s Annexes. Annex II covers species whose conservation requires designation of Special Areas of Conservation while Annex IV lists species of community interest in need of strict protection. The Directive led to the establishment of a network of Special Areas of Conservation, which together with the existing Special Protection Areas under the Birds Directive form a network of protected sites across the European Union called Natura 2000.

Twenty-nine butterfly species are listed on the Annexes of the Habitats Directive 1. To assist everyone who wants or needs to take action for one of these species, Butterfly Conservation Europe has produced the present document in collaboration with many species experts. General principles of management that apply to most if not all Natura 2000 sites are provided. This is specified by an overview of the habitat requirements and ecology of each species, as well as information on their conservation status in Europe taken from the recent Red List and their main biogeographical regions (taken from the first reporting on Article 17 of the Directive). Most important in each species account are the Dos and Don'ts, which summarize in a few bullet points what to do and what to avoid in order to protect and conserve the butterflies and their habitats.

We hope this overview will help member states, nature wardens, farmers, civil servants, butterfly enthusiasts and everyone who wants to help Butterfly Conservation Europe in preserving the natural heritage of Europe, especially its butterflies. As butterflies are good indicators of wildlife rich habitats, the guidelines will help conserve overall biodiversity.

This document aims at describing what to do (and what not to do) to preserve butterflies and their habitats, listed on the annexes of the Habitats Directive. This Zerynthia polyxena on a flower rich meadow in Greece is one of them. Photo: Tom Nygaard Kristensen.

Managing Natura 2000 sites for butterflies and biodiversity 1. Manage at the landscape scale

Butterflies usually exist in a network of local populations with some exchange of adults between them to form a metapopulation. Management should aim to maintain this population network across the landscape, accepting that not every locality may be suitable at any one time (though some core sites will be). Progressive loss of habitat suitability across a landscape, or new barriers to dispersal, can lead to loss of local populations and eventually regional extinction of a species through the breakdown of metapopulations.

2. Maintain active pastoral systems

Grassland is the single most important habitat for butterflies and abandonment is the biggest single threat in much of the EU, although the fundamental destruction of (especially moist) ‘unimproved’ meadows and pastures though agricultural intensification still causes major losses and is a particular threat to member states in eastern Europe, e.g. Poland and Hungary. Abandonment can temporarily lead to good conditions for many species, but will soon lead to scrub encroachment and eventual loss of suitable breeding conditions as open grassland turns to woodland. The maintenance of open grassland is thus essential, usually by the maintenance of active traditional pastoral systems, including livestock grazing and hay cutting. The extensive use of fertilizers should be avoided. Socio-economic conditions will need to be considered to ensure such pastoral systems survive.

Traditional hay making provides optimal conditions for many butterflies. Photo: Chris van Swaay.

3. Manage for variety

Grassland butterflies each have their own specific habitat requirements, especially in the typically inconspicuous larval stage, so management should aim to provide a range of conditions, often based around traditional land use patterns. Some species require short vegetation for breeding, while others require higher vegetation. Others still require mosaics of vegetation types. Managing for habitat variety across a landscape is thus essential to conserve the full range of typical species.

4. Avoid uniform management (especially in hay meadows)

Butterfly populations can be badly damaged, or can even become extinct, following intensive and uniform management, notably hay cutting. Cutting dates should be varied as much as possible across each Natura 2000 site so that not all areas are cut within a narrow time window. Ideally a mosaic of small scale cutting should be implemented, replicating traditional management before mechanisation. This variation in management, both in time and in space, should also be applied in other habitats, like wet meadows at the edges of peat bogs, moors and shallow bogs.

5. Habitat mosaics are crucial

Many butterflies use resources found in a range of habitat types and require mosaics of different habitats in the landscape. For example, some species breed along scrub or wood edges and need a mixture of scrub and grassland. Other species may lay eggs in one type of habitat and use nectar resources in another. The spatial scale of the mosaic will vary from region to region, and will often depend on the traditional land use pattern. Sometimes it will be small fields with small blocks of scrub or woodland, while in more extensive landscapes the mosaic may be very large scale. Many, if not all butterfly species prefer some wind-shade, especially in more windy areas.

6. Active woodland management is often essential

Most woodland butterflies require some form of active management and this is essential for the survival of several threatened species. Management can either be regular thinning or rotational coppicing or planting. Some species also require the maintenance of open habitats within woodland, such as sunny clearings or paths/tracks. Traditional management is often a useful guide to suitable management, but may need to be adapted to suit modern timber markets. In Nordic countries as well as in many countries in Eastern Europe, woodland areas with plenty of wide open corridors with natural vegetation are important not for woodland species only, but are also inhabited by the majority of grassland species.

A mosaic of management combined with a flower rich road verge provides a wealth of butterflies. Photo: Chris van Swaay.

7. Monitoring is essential

Some form of biological monitoring of Natura 2000 sites is essential to ensure management is maintaining the designated features or will improve degraded habitats. Butterflies are a sensitive indicator group that can be used to assess change (both positive and negative) and inform decision making. Many butterflies are easy to identify and there are often local volunteer groups or societies who can help provide data. Monitoring can be as simple as successive species inventories, or can be structured around formal sampling procedures such as butterfly transects. The latter are more time consuming but can provide accurate population trends that can show deleterious changes at an early stage.


Red List Link: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/downloads/European_butterflies.pdf


Selected references

(Dover and Settele 2009; Dover et al. 2011a; Dover et al. 2011b; Paracchini et al. 2008; Settele et al. 2008; Settele et al. 2009; van Helsdingen et al. 1998; van Swaay et al. 2010; van Swaay et al. 2011; van Swaay et al. 2006; van Swaay 2002; van Swaay et al. 2009; van Swaay and Warren 2006).

Species of the Habitats Directive Zerynthia polyxena (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775)

E: Southern Festoon

F: La Diane

D: Osterluzeifalter


Habitat and ecology

The caterpillars of the Southern Festoon live on various birthworts, such as Aristolochia clematitis, Aristolochia rotunda, Aristolochia pallida and Aristolochia pistolochia. Because their foodplants grow in different habitats and the caterpillars also have different foodplants in different areas, this spring butterfly can be found in quite different habitats. In the western part of its range, it can be seen in open places along rivers with the foodplant Aristolochia rotunda. In the mountains, the butterflies can be seen in dry, sunny, rocky places, where Aristolochia pallida and Aristolochia pistolochia grow. In the Pannonian region, the species is found on sites with ruderal vegetation, e.g. along the Danube, but also in vineyards on sunny slopes, where Aristolochia clematitis grows as a weed. In Greece, the butterfly occurs in damp areas, as well as on dry slopes, according to the species of birthwort used as foodplant. The eggs are laid singly or in small groups on the underside of the leaves, where the caterpillars are usually also found. The caterpillars have a striking appearance. Mostly beige with black spots, they have some orange tubercles on each segment, each ending in a black, spiny tuft. The Southern Festoon has one generation a year and hibernates as pupa. Habitats: dry calcareous grasslands and steppes (14%), humid grasslands and tall herb communities (12%), mesophile grasslands (12%), heath and scrub (9%), dry siliceous grasslands (7%), sclerophyllous scrub (7%), alluvial and very wet forests and brush (7%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/174351/1


Red List Status

Europe: Least Concern

EU-27: Least Concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: not assessed

Continental region: bad

Mediterranean region: not assessed

Pannonian region: favourable


Threats in Europe

This species is not believed to face major threats at the European level in this part of its distribution. However, after 1960 a drastic population decrease started due to the intensification of agricultural practices and the use of pesticides.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annex 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. This species occurs in a number of protected areas across its range. No specific conservation actions are needed at a European level, but in countries where the species is in decline important habitats should be protected and managed. The effects should be monitored by Butterfly Monitoring Schemes.

Zerynthia polyxena. Photo: Kars Veling.

Zerynthia polyxena


Dos

  • Support the proliferation of its foodplants by keeping and creating ruderal “wasteland” in suitable areas.

Don'ts

  • Destroy sites with the foodplant or completely cut the vegetation.
  • Mow before the time of pupation (April to July, depending on location).
  • Spray insecticides or herbicides in vineyards with the food

Selected references

(Batáry et al. 2008; Dapporto 2010; Höttinger 2003; Örvössy et al. 2005)

Parnassius mnemosyne (Linnaeus, 1758)

E: Clouded Apollo

F: Le Semi-Apollon

D: Schwarzer Apollo


Habitat and ecology

The Clouded Apollo occurs in rocky regions on damp to moderately dry grasslands and sparse deciduous woodland, forest clearings and edges in the neighborhood of large stands of the larval foodplants of the genus Corydalis. The butterflies can often be seen nectaring on red or purple flowers. Larvae are usually found feeding on foodplants that occur on sunny margins or clearings in the forests. The egg hibernates. In spring, as soon as it has hatched, the small caterpillar starts its search for a suitable foodplant. When fully-grown, it pupates in a closely spun cocoon of fine threads, situated above the ground in the leaves of the foodplant or litter. The Clouded Apollo has one generation a year. Habitats: broad-leaved deciduous forests (22%), alpine and subalpine grasslands (19%), mesophile grasslands (14%), humid grasslands and tall herb communities (10%), mixed woodland (8%), dry calcareous grasslands and steppes (8%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/174210/1


Red List Status

Europe: Near threatened

EU: Least concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: inadequate

Boreal region: inadequate

Continental region: inadequate

Mediterranean region: unknown

Pannonian region: inadequate


Threats in Europe

This species is especially threatened by changes in the management of semi-natural grasslands and woodland. Both intensification and abandonment will have a negative impact on this butterfly. In light-penetrated rupicolous forests with abundant Corydalis it can survive under natural conditions, without management.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annex 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. In countries where the species is in decline important habitats should be protected and managed. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme.

Parnassius mnemosyne. Photo: Kars Veling.

Parnassius mnemosyne


Dos

  • Continue traditional low-intensity management.
  • Maintain semi-open woodland by keeping a mosaic of woodland and meadows.
  • Create woodland gaps e.g. by coppicing.
  • Maintain wide and diverse woodland edges and preserve wide open corridors along forest roads.
  • Restore previously occupied localities.
  • In Nordic countries maintain meadows with alder strips along rivers and streams that create plenty of suitable habitats for Corydalis solida, and thus indirectly for the butterfly.

Don'ts

  • Intensify the management of grasslands where they occur.
  • Intensification of forestry should be avoided.
  • Abandon management. After abandonment the species can survive for some years, but will disappear soon.
  • Replace deciduous forest with coniferous trees.

Selected references

(Bergström 2005; Brommer and Fred 1999; Gorbach and Kabanen 2010; Gratton et al. 2008; Konvička et al. 2001; Konvička and Kuras 1999; Konvička et al. 2006; Luoto et al. 2001; Meglecz et al. 1999; Välimäki and Itämies 2003)

Parnassius apollo (Linnaeus, 1758)

E: Apollo

F: l’Apollon

D: Apollo


Habitat and ecology

The Apollo occurs in mountainous areas on steep, sunny slopes with sparse vegetation. In Europe, there are many different subspecies, forms and aberrations, because of the fragmented distribution and consequently, isolation of populations. However, their ecology is similar. The butterflies are found visiting thistles and other flowering plants. The female lays its eggs singly or in small groups on or near the foodplant Stonecrop (Sedum spp.). The eggs develop but the tiny caterpillar hibernates inside the eggshell or as newly hatched larva in its close vicinity. In spring it starts feeding on the buds of the foodplant. The caterpillars of later instars also eat the leaves. When it is time to pupate, the caterpillars look for a safe place between the stones, where they then spin a flimsy cocoon in which to change into a pupa. The Apollo has one generation a year. Habitats: alpine and subalpine grasslands (23%), dry calcareous grasslands and steppes (19%), inland cliffs and exposed rocks (11%), screes (9%), coniferous woodland (7%), broad-leaved deciduous forests (7%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/16249/1


Red List Status

Europe: Near threatened

EU: Near threatened


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: inadequate

Atlantic region: unknown

Boreal region: bad

Continental region: bad

Mediterranean region: unknown


Threats in Europe

This species is declining in areas of low altitude. Many lowland populations have gone extinct in the last fifty years. They suffer from fragmentation and isolation. Still large and strong populations are found in the high parts of the Alps and other high mountain ranges. The species is attractive to collectors, especially the subspecies of small lowland populations.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annex 4, Bern Convention Annex 2 and CITES Appendix II. In Poland, the species only occurs in protected areas. The species is legally protected in many countries. In spite of this legal protection, there is often no special attention to the habitat management. As a consequence many small lowland populations are in decline. The production and implementation of local species action plans are urgently needed.

Parnassius apollo. Photo: Albert Vliegenthart.

Parnassius apollo


Dos

  • Keep traditional land uses (i.e. extensive stock grazing and hay-cutting) in mountain areas.
  • Maintain traditional extensive grazing management and hay-cutting regimes in alpine regions.
  • Allow Sedum-species to grow in between orchards, fields, vineyards, along streets and on rocks.
  • Leave room for nectar plants, e.g. thistles.
  • Prevent succession of steppe-like habitat to scrubland and forest by removing scrub.
  • Monitor populations.
  • Restore afforested areas in places where the butterfly lived prior to these plantations.
  • Mitigate the effects of climate change that is causing the extinction of populations living in the highest areas of mountain ranges.

Don'ts

  • For lowland populations: don’t use pesticides on a large scale, as the larvae that live in between the orchards, vineyards and fields will be killed.
  • Remove all herbs, as they are important nectar sources.
  • Afforest open areas in mountains of Southern Europe.
  • Build new tourist developments, especially related to ski sports in mountain areas and roads facilitating access of tourists to areas with the butterfly.
  • Collect specimens, particularly those from rare or isolated subspecies or populations.
  • Abandon the sites.

Selected references

(Ashton et al. 2009; Deschamps-Cottin et al. 1997; Fred and Brommer 2003; Fred and Brommer 2005; 2010; Fred et al. 2006; Geyer and Dolek 2001; Nakonieczny et al. 2007; Todisco et al. 2010; Witkowski et al. 1997)

Papilio hospiton Guenée, 1839

E: Corsican Swallowtail

F: Le Porte-queue de Corse

D: Korsischer Schwalbenschwanz


Habitat and ecology

The Corsican Swallowtail is a butterfly of open, grassy slopes, often with some scattered rocks and bushes and of slopes with low-growing scrub. Just as the Swallowtail, Papilio machaon, these butterflies show hill-topping behaviour, the males assembling on hilltops or other prominent features in the landscape, waiting for the females to arrive. In Corsica, they are found on three different foodplants, Giant Fennel (Ferula communis), Ruta corsica and Peucedanum paniculatum, different populations being strictly bound to one type of foodplant. However, in Sardinia, the caterpillars are only found on Giant Fennel (Ferula communis). The Corsican Swallowtail has one generation a year and hibernates in the pupal stage. On Corsica reported to do well after forest fires. Habitats: heath and scrub (16%), sclerophyllous scrub (16%), phrygana (16%), dry calcareous grasslands and steppes (16%), dry siliceous grasslands (16%), alpine and subalpine grasslands (16%). This is a European endemic species.


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/15993/0


Red List Status

Europe: Least concern

EU: Least concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Mediterranean region: inadequate


Threats in Europe

This species is not believed to face major threats at the European level.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annexes 2 and 4, Bern Convention Annex 2 and CITES Appendix I. This species occurs in a number of protected areas across its range. No specific conservation actions are needed at a European level. In France and Italy, not all populations are in Natura 2000 areas.

Papilio hospiton in its habitat. Photo: Tom Nygaard Kristensen.

Papilio hospiton


Dos

  • Continue traditional land use characterized by heavy grazing and controlled burning.

Selected references

(Aubert et al. 1997; Aubert et al. 1996; Cianchi et al. 2003; Manil and Diringer 2003)

Papilio alexanor Esper, 1800

E: Southern Swallowtail

F: l’Alexanor


Habitat and ecology

The Southern Swallowtail is mostly found on warm, dry calcareous slopes with flower-rich vegetation and low-growing bushes. The butterflies prefer slopes that are steep and rocky. They are especially active during the hottest hours of the day. Different foodplants are known, all of them umbellifers. Ptychotis saxifraga is the most important one in the western part of its range, but eggs are also laid on Opopanax chironium, Seseli montanum and Trinia glauca. In the Eastern part, the caterpillars feed mostly on various fennels (Ferula spp.) and also on Opopanax hispidus, Burnet saxifrage (Pimpinella saxifraga), Scaligeria cretica and Wild Parsnip (Pastinaca sativa). The caterpillars eat the flowers and ripening seeds. They seem to prefer plants growing in very sparse vegetation near bare patches. The Southern Swallowtail has one generation a year and passes the winter in the pupal stage. Habitats: phrygana (40%), sclerophyllous scrub (20%), heath and scrub (20%), dry calcareous grasslands and steppes (10%), dry siliceous grasslands (10%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/174220/1


Red List Status

Europe: Least concern

EU: Least concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: favourable

Mediterranean region: unknown


Threats in Europe

Although this species shows a decline in a part of its European range, it is not believed to face major threats at the European scale.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annex 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. This species occurs in a number of protected areas across its range. No specific action is needed at a European level, but in countries where the species is in decline important habitats should be protected and managed. The effects should be monitored by Butterfly Monitoring Schemes.

Papilio alexanor. Photo: Albert Vliegenthart.

Papilio alexanor


Dos

  • Maintain traditional extensive management for example with light goat grazing and/or controlled burning.

Don'ts

  • Abandon the sites.

Selected references

(Bollino and Sala 2004; David and Sanetra 1994; Freina 1983; Kahlheber 1976)

Leptidea morsei (Fenton, 1881)

E: Fenton’s Wood White

D: Östlicher Senfweißling


Habitat and ecology

Apart from its greater size and slightly falcate forewings the species can be separated from the other Wood Whites in Europe (Leptidea spp.) by the conspicuous gliding flight displayed by the males. Fenton’s Wood White can be seen on damp, grassy vegetation at the sunny edges of woods, in grassy woodland clearings and on regenerating woodland on grassland. They occur almost exclusively in oak forest and mixed deciduous woods. This butterfly has two generations a year and hibernates in the pupal stage. The larvae feed on Peas, in Europe on Lathyrus niger or Lathyrus vernus with ova being laid almost exclusively on the plants in the shade. In Transylvania, an important larval food plant is the endemic Lathyrus hallersteinii. Habitats: broad-leaved deciduous forests (40%), mesophile grasslands (15%), humid grasslands and tall herb communities (10%), coniferous woodland (10%), mixed woodland (10%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/174284/1


Red List Status

Europe: Near threatened

EU: Endangered


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: bad

Continental region: inadequate

Pannonian region: bad


Threats in Europe

In Europe the species is restricted to Central and Eastern Europe, where it is never common and mostly declining. Main threat is change of woodland management, resulting in a decline of the traditional light-penetrated forest structure.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive, Annexes 2 and 4. More research is needed on the distribution and ecology of the species. Suitable habitats should be protected and appropriately managed. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme.

Leptidea morsei. Photo: Rudi Verovnik.

Leptidea morsei


Dos

  • Continue traditional low-intensity management to maintain mosaic woodland habitat with large stands of the main larval foodplant Lathyrus niger.
  • Maintain sparse woods or create woodland gaps by coppicing.
  • Maintain wide and diverse woodland edges and preserve wide open corridors along forest roads.
  • Keep flower rich meadows near larval habitats with late season hay-cutting.

Don'ts

  • Abandon management of light woods.
  • Intensify forestry or produce closed monocultures.
  • Remove road edge vegetation mechanically during larval development.
  • Replace deciduous forest with conifer trees.
  • Intensify the management of nearby flowering meadows.
  • Allow woodland grazing.

Selected references

(Gascoigne-Pees et al. 2008; Höttinger 2004; Lorković 1993)

Colias myrmidone (Esper, 1781)

E: Danube Clouded Yellow

F: Le Danubien

D: Orangeroter Heufalter


Habitat and ecology

The Danube Clouded Yellow occurs in dry, warm grassland where its foodplant, species of the genus Chamaecytisus, are always abundant. However, the amount of shelter from bushes can vary considerably. While the female lays its eggs on the foodplant, the caterpillars hibernate in the litter layer. It has two to three generations a year. The species shows serious declines, especially at the western edge of its range. Within the last years it disappeared most probably from Germany, the Czech Republic, Austria, Hungary, Slovenia and Serbia. Habitats: dry calcareous grasslands and steppes (30%), mesophile grasslands (21%), dry siliceous grasslands (21%), coniferous woodland (8%), mixed woodland (8%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/174283/1


Red List Status

Europe: Endangered

EU: Critically endangered


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: bad

Continental region: inadequate

Pannonian region: bad


Threats in Europe

This species is threatened both by intensification and abandonment of semi-natural grasslands, its main habitat. Furthermore, especially for the westernmost parts, climate change is considered as one of the most important reasons for the decline, but it cannot fully explain the situation over this scale. It is certain that in some cases land-use changes even under Agri-Environmental Schemes have led to drastic declines. In general, loss of habitat and habitat connectivity, unfavourable grassland management (wrong timing or intensity) and climate change (less continental climate) must be considered. At this moment abandonment and intensification of grazing and burning are probably the largest threats to the populations in Eastern Europe.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive, Annexes 2 and 4. More research is urgently needed on the distribution and ecology of the species. Important habitats should be protected and appropriately managed. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme. It benefits from proper management of semi-natural grasslands. The species will benefit from the establishment of areas of High Nature Value Farmland. In Hungary the species used to occur only in protected areas. However, there are no recent records from Hungary despite deliberate surveys.

Colias mymidone. Photo: Tom Nygaard Kristensen.

Colias myrmidone


Dos

  • Maintain herb-rich meadows with scattered stands of the foodplant by mosaic management with light grazing or rotational mowing.
  • Maintain wide range of habitats with nectar sources (herb-rich meadows, broad forest edges and very open forests).
  • Maintain traditional extensive land-use to encourage mobility across the landscape.
  • Implement national action plans with site- and specific actions.
  • Follow up the actions in the Species Action Plan (see http://bc-europe.org/SpeciesActionPlans/EUSAP_Colias_myrmidone_final_draft.pdf)

Don'ts

  • Intensify land-use on a large scale, e.g. by reforestation.
  • Carry out intensive mowing on meadows.
  • Carry out intensive grazing on pastures (overgrazing by sheep is harmful as they eat the fertile shoots of Chamaecytisus!).
  • Change the management leading to the closure of the forest and loss of the woodland pasture mosaic landscape.
  • Abandon management which leads to overgrowing of grasslands.
  • Burn the sites in spring or fall.

Selected references

(Dolek et al. 2005; Freese et al. 2005; Konvička et al. 2008a)

Lycaena helle (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775)

E: Violet Copper

F: Le Cuivré de la bistorte

D: Blauschillernder Feuerfalter


Habitat and ecology

The Violet Copper is a rare butterfly that is often confined to very small sites, where it may be seen in large numbers. It is found in swampy, wet grassland with sufficient wind shelter (shrub, forest edges) and rough vegetation bordering streams and lakes. In Central Europe, eggs are laid on the underside of the leaves of Bistort (Polygonum bistorta). In Transylvania mostly humid or damp oak forest clearings with mosaic-like vegetation. In the north of its range Viviparous Bistort (Polygonum vivipara) is also used as larval foodplant. The young caterpillars eat the lower epidermis, thus making the characteristic “windows”. It passes the winter as a pupa. Its western populations have one, the eastern populations mostly two generations a year. Habitats: humid grasslands and tall herb communities (37%), alpine and subalpine grasslands (10%), water-fringe vegetation (8%), fens, transition mires and springs (8%), dry calcareous grasslands and steppes (5%), mesophile grasslands (5%).

Habitat Lycaena helle, Eifel, Germany. Photo: Chris van Swaay.


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/174383/1


Red List Status

Europe: Endangered

EU: Least concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: bad

Boreal region: bad

Continental region: bad


Threats in Europe

Land drainage and agricultural improvements and afforestation are the most important threat for this species. In some cases, because of agricultural abandonment, meadows get covered with rough vegetation and finally trees and shrubs. Central European populations are often small and isolated, making it hard for the species to re-colonise former sites. These populations also sometimes suffer wrong management, e.g. mowing at the wrong time of year. In Northern Europe the species is threatened by abandonment of peripheral agricultural grounds, fertilization and afforestation, the species has lost more than half of its habitats (and continues to lose) during the last 30 years.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive, Annexes 2 and 4. In Belarus and Poland, it only occurs in protected areas. None of the populations are in Natura 2000 areas in Austria. In spite of legal protection of important butterfly habitats special management of these habitats for Lycaena helle is only conducted in few countries (e.g. in Belgium). It requires sensitive management of semi-natural grasslands and would benefit from the establishment of areas of High Nature Value Farmland. Populations should be monitored closely, for example by Butterfly Monitoring Schemes. There is an action plan for monitoring of this species under construction in Sweden.

Lycaena helle. Photo: Chris van Swaay.

Lycaena helle


Dos

  • Maintain a low-intensity management: grazing with very light stocking rates (< 0.2 Lifestock Units ha−1), preferably used in a rotational way, and avoiding sensitive periods of the butterfly life cycle (April to July, best is starting in August, accompanied by periodic clearing and outrooting of shrub (mainly Salix).
  • Preserve humid forest clearings and protect them from re-forestation. Some fringe vegetation is needed for roosting butterflies.
  • Selectively cut encroaching scrub if necessary.
  • Maintain or reconstruct the natural water regimes of brooks and small rivers to keep the soils in an oligotrophic state (which is supported by high water ground level).

Don'ts

  • Drain the habitats where the species occurs.
  • Abandon the areas: instead try to maintain a low level of management.
  • Fertilize the habitats.

Selected references

(Bauerfeind et al. 2009; Finger et al. 2009; Fischer et al. 1999; Habel et al. 2010a; Habel et al. 2011a; Habel et al. 2011b; Habel et al. 2010b; Martín Cano et al. 2009; Meyer 1981; Meyer and Helminger 1994; Steiner et al. 2006)

Lycaena dispar (Haworth, 1802)

E: Large Copper

F: Le Grand Cuivré

D: Grosser Feuerfalter


Habitat and ecology

The Large Copper occurs in marshy habitats and on the peaty banks of lakes, rivers and streams and more to the East also on waste lands. Nectar plants are important, especially for the females. Eggs are laid on docks (Rumex spp.) like Rumex crispus, Rumex obtusifolius and Rumex hydrolapathum, but never on sorrels (like Rumex acetosa or Rumex acetosella). The young caterpillars first eat from the underside of the leaves, making the characteristic ‘windows’. Later caterpillars feed on the whole leaf. They hibernate when half-grown between withered leaves at the base of the foodplant. They are sometimes associated with ants (Myrmica rubra and Lasius niger). The Large Copper has several subspecies in Europe. The largest of them, Lycaena dispar batavus, is confined to the extensive wetlands in the north of The Netherlands. The males of this subspecies occupy territories in the warmest places in depressions in the vegetation. Their caterpillars feed only on Water Dock (Rumex hydrolapathum). There are two smaller (and less threatened) subspecies, Lycaena dispar rutilus and Lycaena dispar carueli that use also other docks as foodplants. The subspecies Lycaena dispar batavus has one generation a year and the other subspecies one, two or sometimes even three. Habitats: humid grasslands and tall herb communities (26%), water-fringe vegetation (14%), fens, transition mires and springs (11%), mesophile grasslands (8%), broad-leaved deciduous forests (7%), blanket bogs (5%), dry calcareous grasslands and steppes (5%).

Habitat Lycaena dispar, Netherlands. Photo: Jaap Bouwman.


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/12433/1


Red List Status

Europe: Least concern

EU: Least concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: inadequate

Atlantic region: inadequate

Boreal region: favourable

Continental region: inadequate

Mediterranean region: unknown

Pannonian region: inadequate


Threats in Europe

Where the species lives in marshland it is threatened by reclamation, groundwater extraction or desiccation. Grassland and wasteland habitats become unsuitable if they are abandoned and become invaded by shrubs and trees.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annexes 2 and 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. More research is needed on the distribution and ecology of the species. Suitable habitats should be protected and appropriately managed. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme. In The Netherlands, the species only occurs in protected areas. In Estonia, Finland and Germany, it populations also occur outside Natura 2000 areas.

Lycaena dispar. Photo Chris van Swaay.

Lycaena dispar


Dos

  • Manage wet grasslands by extensive mowing or grazing to maintain larval habitats (e.g. docks as foodplants) and maintain rarely used sites (with higher stands of wetland grasses and sedges) for adult interactions (mating).
  • Particularly in the Netherlands maintain stands of Rumex hydrolopathum along dike and pond margins.
  • Create and maintain wastelands and sites with ruderal vegetation in the eastern and southern part of its range.

Don'ts

  • Use drainage or any other action that sinks the water level.
  • Intensify or abandon the area. The species needs regular management, but at a very low level.

Selected references

(Bink 1986; Duffey 1968; Kühne et al. 2001; Lafranchis et al. 2001; Lai and Pullin 2004; Loritz and Settele 2006; Martin and Pullin 2004a; b; Nicholls and Pullin 2000; 2003; Pullin 1997; Pullin et al. 1998; Strausz et al. in press; Väisänen et al. 1983; Webb and Pullin 1996; 2000; Werner and Möller 2003)

Pseudophilotes bavius (Eversmann, 1832)

E: Bavius Blue


Habitat and ecology

The Bavius Blue occurs in small isolated populations on flower-rich, dry grassland, on dry, stony slopes and on open patches in shrub and in vineyards on calcareous soil. Various species of Salvia are used as foodplant, including Sage (Salvia officinalis), Salvia nutans, Salvia verbenaca and Whorled Clary (Salvia verticillata). Most important food plant in Romania is Salvia nutans as character species of steppic grasslands. The caterpillars feed mostly on the flowers, but sometimes also on the leaves. They are frequently found with ants. The Bavius Blue usually has one prolonged generation a year. In Peloponnesus, a partial second generation may occur. The pupa hibernates. In Eastern- and South-Eastern Europe there are many different endemic subspecies. In Transylvania the subspecies hungarica occurs, in South-East Romania it is the subspecies egea. In Peloponnesus the subspecies casimiri is found, while in Macedonia another subspecies macedonicus has been described. The habitat structure, ecology and biology was studied on populations of the subspecies hungarica in Transylvania. The largest of these populations has been monitored since 1977. In this period large natural population fluctuations have been recorded. The butterflies do not disperse easily; they hardly ever leave their breeding ground. Habitats: dry calcareous grasslands and steppes (50%), phrygana (20%), dry siliceous grasslands (10%), sclerophyllous scrub (10%), screes (10%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/174375/1


Red List Status

Europe: Least concern

EU: Least concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Mediterranean region: unknown

Continental region (not assessed for article 17, BCE expert opinion): inadequate (Transylvania)

Black Sea region (not assessed for article 17, BCE expert opinion): unknown


Threats in Europe

Although this species shows a decline in a part of its European range, it is not believed to face major threats at the European scale. However, according to recent studies, the species is within the EU 27 probably more endangered than its threat category suggests.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive, Annexes 2 and 4. It is unknown if all populations are in Natura 2000 areas in Greece. Not all populations are in Natura 2000 areas in Romania. More research is needed on the distribution and ecology of the species. Suitable habitats should be protected and appropriately managed. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme.

Pseudophilotes bavius. Photo Albert Vliegenthart.

Pseudophilotes bavius


Dos

  • Manage dry grasslands by traditional extensive grazing and mowing once a year.
  • Maintain connectivity between habitat patches.
  • It is necessary to extend the protected area over the habitat of all known populations.
  • Implement national action plans for local conservation of the subspecies and its habitat.

Don'ts

  • Abandon traditional management of dry grassland.
  • Intensify grazing and mowing of dry grasslands by higher stocking rate and longer grazing periods.
  • Allow afforestation of dry grassland areas with Pinus sp. and Robinia pseudoacacia.
  • Use terrace-shaped slopes as vineyards.

Selected references

(Coutsis 2008; Crisan et al. 2011; Dincă et al. 2011; Jutzeler et al. 1997b; König 1992; Tolman 1992)

Phengaris arion (Linnaeus, 1758)

Name in the Habitats Directive: Maculinea arion

E: Large Blue

F: l’Azuré du serpolet

D: Schwarzgefleckter Bläuling, Thymian-Ameisenbläuling


Habitat and ecology

The Large Blue occurs locally on dry, open grasslands on limestone and sandy areas. It is one of the larger, more conspicuous blues. The females lay their eggs on different species of thyme (Thymus spp.), and on warmer sites also on Marjoram (Origanum vulgare). The caterpillars feed on the buds and flowers of the foodplant. After a few weeks they leave their foodplant and allow themselves to be taken by workers into the nests of any species of Myrmica ant, although over most of Europe survival is high only with Myrmica sabuleti, which must adopt at least 67% of larvae for a population to persist; in north-east Europe there is some evidence of a host switch to Myrmica lobicornis. The caterpillars feed on the ant grubs, hibernating and pupating there as well. Habitats: dry calcareous grasslands and steppes (20%), dry siliceous grasslands (15%), mesophile grasslands (9%), coniferous woodland (7%), alpine and subalpine grasslands (7%), humid grasslands and tall herb communities (7%), heath and scrub (6%).

Habitat Phengaris arion, Eifel, Germany. Photo: Chris van Swaay.


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/12659/1


Red List Status

Europe: Endangered

EU: Endangered


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: bad

Atlantic region: unknown but not favourable

Boreal region: bad

Continental region: bad

Mediterranean region: unknown

Pannonian region: bad


Threats in Europe

In many parts of Europe this species is restricted to nature reserves. Here the main threat is inappropriate management, as this species is very susceptible to small changes in grazing pressure or other changes in management. Where the species is more widespread, loss of habitat by agricultural intensification and abandonment, as well as afforestation, are the main threats.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annex 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. Phengaris arion is one of the best investigated butterfly species in Europe. Ecological demands are relatively well known especially in W-Europe, but special attention for the species in habitat management is only given in a few, mainly Western European countries (e.g. United Kingdom). Suitable habitats should be protected and appropriately managed. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme. In Belgium, Denmark and in the United Kingdom, the species only occurs in protected areas. The species and its habitat are legally protected in many countries. Phengaris arion has been reintroduced in the United Kingdom. It benefits from proper management of semi-natural grasslands. It requires sensitive management of semi-natural grasslands and would benefit from the establishment of areas of High Nature Value Farmland. In central-southern France (Dordogne, Rhone valley) Phengaris arion supports a beautiful, probably host-specific (and hence more endangered) parasitoid Neotypus coreensis whose ecological requirements are unknown.

Phengaris arion. Photo Chris van Swaay.

Phengaris arion


Dos

  • Manage grasslands by grazing to maintain open, sunny conditions. The level of grazing will depend on latitude and local micro-climate. Throughout its range, the aim is to maximize the abundance of the host ant Myrmica species in areas where one or more of the initial foodplant grows.
  • In the northern part of the species range and at high altitudes, aim for a short turf of 2–5 cm but remove grazing from early May - late July to avoid removal of flower-heads of the initial foodplant, Thymus spp. Also maintain some patches of scrub cover to provide shelter and warm conditions.
  • In central and southern parts of the species range, grazing can be lighter and more extensive to create a range of turf heights and abundant food-plants such as Origanum. On poor soils in southern Europe, Origanum-using populations also thrive in abandoned grassland for up to 7 years after abandonment, at which stage periodic clearances are essential to restore the succession.
  • Where scrub is present, manage by cutting on rotation and aim for overall cover of less than 20% in core breeding areas.
  • Monitor populations of the butterfly and its host ant carefully, and adjust management when needed.

Don'ts

  • Intensify or abandon the fields, except temporarily in hot climates.
  • Overgraze sites, especially from mid-summer when flower-heads are removed.

Selected references

(Bereczki et al. 2011; Casacci et al. 2011; Elmes and Thomas 1992; Mouquet et al. 2005; Munguira and Martín 1999; Patricelli et al. 2011; Settele et al. 2005b; Spitzer et al. 2009; Thomas and Simcox 2005; Thomas et al. 2009; Wynhoff 1998)

Phengaris teleius (Bergsträsser, 1779)

Name in the Habitats Directive: Maculinea teleius

E: Scarce Large Blue

F: l’Azuré de la sanguisorbe

D: Grosser Moorbläuling, Heller Wiesenknopf-Ameisenbläuling


Habitat and ecology

The Scarce Large Blue can be found in moderately nutrient-rich meadows, edges with rough vegetation and parts of shallow bogs with Great Burnet (Sanguisorba officinalis). In northern Europe, it occurs in open, short vegetation, but in the warm, southern regions, it is also found in rough vegetation. The butterflies tend to keep near the foodplants. The small caterpillars only feed on the flowerheads for two or three weeks. They then go down to the ground where they wait to be picked up by worker ants of the genus Myrmica and carried off to the ants’ nest. There they feed on ant grubs. The caterpillars also hibernate and pupate in the ants’ nest. The main host over most of Europe is Myrmica scabrinodis, with closely related forms or species (with similar management requirements) also used in the south and east. In some regions sufficient individuals also survive with Myrmica rubra for this ant (which prefers later successional stages to Myrmica scabrinodis)to support a few, perhaps temporary, colonies. The Scarce Large Blue has one generation a year. Habitats: humid grasslands and tall herb communities (38%), mesophile grasslands (16%), blanket bogs (12%), water-fringe vegetation (9%), fens, transition mires and springs (9%).

Habitat Phengaris teleius, Netherlands. Photo: Chris van Swaay.


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/12664/1


Red List Status

Europe: Vulnerable

EU: Vulnerable


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: bad

Atlantic region: bad

Boreal region: favourable

Continental region: bad

Pannonian region: inadequate


Threats in Europe

This species is threatened by changes in agricultural management, like drainage, improvement or abandonment.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annexes 2 and 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. Suitable habitats should be protected and appropriately managed. As the species in not mobile, it needs areas with large and well connected patches of habitat. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme. In The Netherlands, the species only occurs in protected areas. In France, Slovenia and Germany, not all populations are in Natura 2000 areas. The species has been re-introduced in The Netherlands in 1990. The habitats of Phengaris teleius are legally protected in many countries, but since many populations are not in nature reserves no special attention is given to the habitat demands. In Romania, a special Agri-Environment Scheme for the protection of Phengaris (Maculinea) butterflies was introduced in 2011. Like for other Phengaris-species, the ecological demands of the Scarce Large Blue are relatively well known. In Hungary and perhaps elsewhere in Eastern Europe, it supports a highly specialized, probably host-specific species of Neotypus (Ichneumonid) parasitoid.

Phengaris teleius. Photo Chris van Swaay.

Phengaris teleius


Dos

  • In the northern part of the species range, mowing is the best management regime to keep the vegetation open and the soil sunny and warm and to maintain a high Myrmica ant nest density.
  • Mow fields once every one to three years. In extensive areas, a 3-year rotation of mowing 33% of patches a year is ideal.
  • Mowing should be done either before the second week of June or after mid- September, on sites at lower altitudes with a warm micro-climate already after the beginning of September. In the first case females can deposit the eggs on the small regrowth of host plants; in the second case the caterpillars have left the host plant before cutting.
  • Maintain 20% of the vegetation per meadow uncut each year on rotation to keep a high level of vegetation structure for a high Myrmica ant nest density. Also maintain some patches of scrub cover or hedges to provide shelter and warm conditions.
  • Depending on the productivity of the soil, meadows may be cut once or twice a year. On poor soils best results are achieved by mowing in September or October, except for a cut early June every 5 to 6 years to prevent bush encroachment.
  • In the southern part of the species range, grassland habitats may also be managed by low intensity grazing, preferably by cattle or ponies. Monitor the density of the stock to keep the right level of grazing intensity. In general, Myrmica scabrinodis (and Myrmica rubra) occur in shorter vegetation on cooler northern sites, resulting in reduced shading of their nests.
  • At landscape scale, create a mosaic of interconnected (within 5 km dispersal potential of species) patches of low intensity agricultural use with both host plants and host ants for the establishment of a meta-population. Allow patches of fallow land as refuge for the host ants. Preferably distances between patches are below 500 m and do not exceed 1 km.
  • Monitor populations of the butterfly and its host ants carefully, and adjust management when needed.
  • When the ant nest density is decreasing or at a too low density, apply small scale management, such as sod cutting in 3x3 m patches or in narrow long lines, to increase vegetation structure and habitat for the ants.
  • When creating new habitats on former agricultural fields, remove the top soil when the phosphate concentration is too high. Use hay from local origin or local seed mixtures with Sanguisorba or plant it into the new habitat.

Don'ts

  • Intensify agricultural use or drain the fields.
  • Graze habitats in the northern part of the species’ range.
  • Abandon fields with single populations. Abandonment is only acceptable if temporary and if the abandoned field is part of a meta-population.
  • Use manure or biocides.
  • Mow the fields when the butterflies are on the wing and the caterpillars are in the buds of the host plant (between mid-June and the end of August).

Selected references

(Batáry et al. 2009; Batáry et al. 2007; Dierks and Fischer 2009; Drechsler et al. 2007; Ernst 1999; Geissler-Strobel 1999; Grill et al. 2008; Johst et al. 2006; Lhonoré 1997; Novak et al. 2007; Nowicki et al. 2007; Nowicki et al. 2005; Settele et al. 2005b; Stettmer et al. 2001a; b; Stettmer et al. 2008; Thomas 1984; Timus et al. 2011; Witek et al. 2010; Witek et al. 2008; Wynhoff 1998; 2001; Wynhoff et al. 2008; Wynhoff et al. 2011)

Phengaris nausithous (Bergsträsser, 1779)

Name in the Habitats Directive: Maculinea nausithous

E: Dusky Large Blue

F: l’Azuré des paluds

D: Schwarzblauer Bläuling, Dunkler Wiesenknopf-Ameisenbläuling


Habitat and ecology

The Dusky Large Blue occurs on damp, moderately nutrient-rich grassland and rough vegetation. The butterflies are usually found on or near the foodplant Great Burnet (Sanguisorba officinalis). Having lived on the flowerheads of this plant for a few weeks, the small caterpillars go down to the ground, in order to be carried away usually by workers of the ant Myrmica rubra to an ant nest. There, they remain feeding on ant grubs, hibernating and pupating in the early summer. The newly-emerged butterflies leave the nest. The Dusky Large Blue is one of the most specialized of the “ant blues” being most adapted to one species of host ant. Populations using Myrmica scabrinodis as the main host ant are extremely rare and probably confined to the edge of the range or to east Europe. The Romanian populations belong to the subspecies kijevensis and prefer Myrmica scabrinodis as host ant. The Dusky Large Blue has one generation a year. Habitats: humid grasslands and tall herb communities (36%), water-fringe vegetation (15%), blanket bogs (12%), fens, transition mires and springs (9%), dry siliceous grasslands (6%), mesophile grasslands (6%). In Germany, the Rhone valley and parts of Poland, it supports a beautiful, highly specialized ichneumonid parasitoid Neotypus ‘pusillus’, which possibly consists of two cryptic species centred on Germany-Poland and the Rhone valley, each host-specific to Phengaris nausithous.

Habitat Phengaris nausithous, Netherlands. Photo: Chris van Swaay.


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/12662/1


Red List Status

Europe: Near threatened

EU: Near threatened


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: inadequate

Atlantic region: bad

Continental region: bad

Mediterranean region: bad

Pannonian region: inadequate


Threats in Europe

Main threats on a European scale come from agricultural improvements (like drainage) and abandonment, and to a lesser extent, intensification of hay cutting. As the species also occurs a lot along road verges, changes to the roads and the management of the verges can have a negative impact as well.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annexes 2 and 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. In Ukraine and Romania, the species only occurs in protected areas. In France, Slovenia and Germany, not all populations are in Natura 2000 areas. In Romania, a special Agri-Environment Scheme for the protection of Phengaris (Maculinea) butterflies was introduced in 2011. The species has been re-introduced in The Netherlands in 1990. Like for other Phengaris-species, the ecological demands of this species are relatively well known.

Phengaris nausithous. Photo Chris van Swaay.

Phengaris nausithous


Dos

  • In the northern part of the species range, mowing is the best management regime to keep the vegetation open and the soil sunny and warm and to maintain a high Myrmica ant nest density.
  • In northern Europe it thrives on sites cut every second year or even every year; under warmer climates longer intervals of up to 5–10 years between cutting are ideal, although the foodplant requires periodic mowing to ensure regeneration. Its Neotypus parasitoidprefers patches that have been abandoned for longer, where Sanguisorba grows in low densities among high densities of Myrmica rubra.
  • Mowing should be done either before the second week of June or after mid-September. In the former case females can deposit the eggs on the small regrowth of host plants; in the latter case the caterpillars have left the host plant before cutting.
  • Allow line-shaped edge structures: leave the vegetation at the edge of the meadow uncut for 1 to 5 years to keep tall and rough vegetation for a high Myrmica rubra ant nest density. Also maintain some patches of scrub cover or hedges to provide shelter and warm conditions for the adult butterflies.
  • Depending on the productivity of the soil, meadows may be cut once a year, and should be left uncut at regular intervals.
  • In the southern part of the species range, grassland habitats may also be managed by low intensity grazing, preferably by cattle or ponies. Monitor the density of the stock to keep the right level of grazing intensity.
  • At the landscape scale, create a mosaic of interconnected (within 5 km dispersal potential of species) patches of low intensity agricultural use with both host plants and host ants for the establishment of a meta-population. Always allow patches of fallow land as refuges for the host ants. The distance between patches should preferably not exceed 1 km.
  • Try to apply rotational management on tall and rough vegetation at meadow edges and along hedges, bushes and forests, cutting it only every three to ten years depending on the productivity of the soil. Choose the rotation so that there is always tall vegetation with large Sanguisorba plants and large Myrmica rubra nests within reach of the butterflies.
  • When creating new habitats on former agricultural fields, remove the top soil when the phosphate concentration is too high. Use seed mixtures with Sanguisorba or plant it into the new habitat.
  • Monitor populations of the butterfly and its host ant carefully, and adjust management when needed.

Don'ts

  • Intensify agricultural use or drain the fields.
  • Graze habitats in the northern part of the range.
  • Increase the stocking rate for sheep grazing in the southern part of Europe.
  • Mow the fields, road verges or ditches when the butterflies are on the wing and the caterpillars are in the buds of the foodplant (roughly in July and August).
  • Allow long term abandonment of fields with single populations. Abandonment is only acceptable if temporary and if the abandoned field is part of a meta-population.
  • Use of manure or biocides.

Selected references

(Anton et al. 2008; Anton et al. 2007a; Anton et al. 2007b; Batáry et al. 2009; Dierks and Fischer 2009; Drechsler et al. 2007; Ernst 1999; Geissler-Strobel 1999; Grill et al. 2008; Johst et al. 2006; Lhonoré 1997; Novak et al. 2007; Nowicki et al. 2007; Nowicki et al. 2005; Rakosy et al. 2010; Settele et al. 2005b; Stettmer et al. 2001a; b; Stettmer et al. 2008; Tartally et al. 2008; Thomas 1984; Witek et al. 2008; Wynhoff 1998; Wynhoff et al. 2008; Wynhoff et al. 2011)

Plebejus aquilo (Boisduval, 1832)

Name in the Habitats Directive: Agriades glandon aquilo

E: Arctic Blue


Habitat and ecology

In Scandinavia, the Arctic Blue occurs above the timber line, mainly on south facing slopes with slate and shale rocks with patches of low alpine vegetation, particularly in areas with limestone or otherwise mineral rich ground. The females deposit the eggs on Yellow Mountain Saxifrage (Saxifraga aizoides) and Purple Saxifrage (Saxifraga oppositifolia). The small caterpillars first feed on the flower buds and hibernate. Later, they also feed on the leaves. The Arctic Blue is single-brooded.


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/174249/1


Red List Status

Europe: Least concern

EU: Least concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: bad

Boreal region: unknown


Threats in Europe

This species is not believed to face major threats at the European level in this part of its distribution. However, it can already be seen that some of the habitats on the lowest altitudes where the species occur are starting to change (the vegetation becomes higher and denser) in a warmer and wetter arctic climate.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annex 2. In Sweden, it is unknown if all populations are in Natura 2000 areas. A surveillance program is in progress since 2008 in Finland and since 2010 in Sweden.

Plebejus aquilo. Photo Nils Ryrholm.

Plebejus aquilo


Dos

  • Monitor the population of the species.
  • Search for other populations on suitable mountains.
  • Co-ordinate this work across the species’ range.

Selected references

(Eliasson et al. 2005; Henriksen and Kreutzer 1982; Välimäki et al. 2011)

Polyommatus golgus(Hübner, 1813)

Name in the Habitats Directive: Plebicula golgus

E: Nevada Blue

ES: Niña de Sierra Nevada


Habitat and ecology

In the Sierra Nevada (Southern Spain), the Nevada Blue can be found in open patches in dwarf Juniper scrub and on grassy vegetation growing between acid, slate rocks and schist. In the Sierra de la Sagra, the butterflies are found on dry, open calcareous slopes with short vegetation. Here, the climatic conditions are extreme, the ground being covered with snow for nine months of the year. One of the plants that can withstand these conditions, the kidney-vetch Anthyllis vulneraria, is the foodplant. The female lays its eggs singly on the upperside of the leaves. The caterpillars hibernate. They pupate in the ground in June. The later instars are often found in the company of ants. Habitats: screes (30%), alpine and subalpine grasslands (30%), Mediterranean mountain shrublands (40%). This is a European endemic species.


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/17940/0


Red List Status

Europe: Vulnerable

EU: Vulnerable


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Mediterranean region: unknown


Threats in Europe

This species has a very restricted range. Here its main threat comes from the building of touristic infrastructure and tourist activities. Regarding its limited distribution it might get threatened in the long run by climate change. As the species is not treated in the Climatic Risk Atlas (Settele et al. 2008) there is no information on the possible change of the climate envelope, but as it lives at high altitudes its range would be drastically limited in space if the climate becomes warmer.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annexes 2 and 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. It is also legally protected in Spain (vulnerable in the Spanish List of Endangered Species). More research is needed on the distribution and ecology of the species. Suitable habitats should be protected and appropriately managed. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme. Not all populations are in Natura 2000 areas and particularly the important populations in the Sierra de la Sagra remain unprotected.

Polyommatus golgus. Photo Miguel López Munguira.

Polyommatus golgus


Dos

  • Monitor populations of the butterfly in Sierra Nevada and La Sagra.
  • In the Sierra Nevada National Park a recovery plan should be prepared for the species, since this is compulsory for species listed in the Spanish List of Endangered Species.
  • More research is needed on the ecology and genetics of the populations from the north of Granada that have recently been ascribed to the species.
  • Protect the populations in La Sagra that are not within the Natura 2000 network.
  • Restore the areas that were destroyed to build ski runs in Sierra Nevada, favouring the natural vegetation and taking away damaging touristic developments.
  • Keep traditional extensive grazing in all the areas where the butterfly has been recorded.

Don'ts

  • Develop new tourist infrastructures in the areas where the butterfly is present within the Sierra Nevada National Park and other adjoining valleys.
  • Build new roads and footpaths in habitats suitable for the butterfly.
  • Overgraze the grasslands where the butterfly lives.

Selected references

(García-Barros et al. 2006; Gil-T. 2007; Mortera et al. 2011; Munguira 1989; Munguira and Martín 1989; 1993; Munguira and Martín 1993; Munguira et al. 2000)

Argynnis elisa Godart, 1823

Name in the Habitats Directive: Fabriciana elisa

E: Corsican Fritillary

F: Le Nacré tyrrhénien


Habitat and ecology

The Corsican Fritillary is a mountain butterfly, found on grassy vegetation in clearings in deciduous woods. The small caterpillars hatch out in spring and begin to feed on violets, preferring plants growing under juniper bushes. Among the foodplants mentioned in the literature are various Viola species, such as Wild Pansy (Viola tricolor), Yellow Wood Violet (Viola biflora), Pale Wood Violet (Viola reichenbachiana) and Viola corsica. The Corsican Fritillary has one generation a year. Habitats: dry calcareous grasslands and steppes (50%), broad-leaved deciduous forests (50%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/173291/1


Red List Status

Europe: Least concern

EU: Least concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Mediterranean region: inadequate


Threats in Europe

Although this is a European endemic with a restricted range, this species is not believed to face major threats at the European level.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annex 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. This species occurs in a number of protected areas across its range. No specific conservation actions are needed at a European level. But since it has a restricted global range, its distribution and trend should be monitored closely, for example by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme.

Argynnis elisa. Photo Tom Nygaard Kristensen.

Argynnis elisa


Dos

  • Maintain traditional management of the habitat.

Don'ts

  • Abandon middle and high elevation areas.

Selected references

(Jutzeler et al. 1997a)

Boloria improba (Butler, 1877)

Name in the Habitats Directive: Clossiana improba

E: Dusky-winged Fritillary


Habitat and ecology

The Dusky-winged Fritillary occurs in the extreme north of Europe on open, grassy expanses above the timber line, often on gentle slopes, some habitats are on slopes sheltered from the prevailing westerly wind. It can occasionally occur in large numbers, in some places with hundreds of butterflies at once. Before they mate, these butterflies behave in a characteristic way, with the male following the female, flying in short spurts and seeming to make grasshopper-like jumps. The eggs are laid on various plants, including Alpine Bistort (Polygonium viviparum). The egg takes two years to develop into a butterfly. Habitats: sclerophyllous scrub (20%), mesophile grasslands (20%), heath and scrub (20%), and alpine and subalpine grasslands (20%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/174312/1


Red List Status

Europe: Endangered

EU: Endangered


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: bad


Threats in Europe

The species occurs usually in low densities in a restricted range in Northern Europe. Furthermore it appears to fluctuate more than other arctic butterflies. Climate warming could be a long term threat due to its limited distribution. It can already be seen that some of the habitats on the lowest altitudes where the species occurs are starting to change (the vegetation becomes higher and denser) in a warmer and wetter arctic climate.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annex 2. More research is needed on the distribution and ecology of the species. The population trend should be monitored by Butterfly Monitoring Schemes. In Sweden, none of the populations are in Natura 2000 areas. However, a surveillance program is in progress (2010–11). In Finland, all populations are in Natura 2000 areas and a surveillance program started in 2008.

Boloria improba. Photo Nils Ryrholm.

Boloria improba


Dos

  • Monitor the population of the species.
  • Search for other populations on suitable mountains.
  • Co-ordinate this work across the species’ range.

Selected references

(Eliasson et al. 2005; Henriksen and Kreutzer 1982; Välimäki et al. 2011)

Nymphalis vaualbum (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775)

E: False Comma

D: Weißes L


Habitat and ecology

The False Comma is somewhat similar to the Comma (Polygonia c-album), but although the wings are strongly toothed, the indentations are much less deep than those of the Comma. It also resembles the Large Tortoiseshell (Nymphalis polychloros), but the white patches near the tips of the forewing and on the front edge of the hindwing distinguish it from both these butterfly species. It occurs in Eastern Europe, in deciduous or mixed woods. It prefers damp woods and is found in clearings or at the wood edge. It is a mobile butterfly and a strong migrant. Because of its migratory behaviour, it is difficult to ascertain whether populations are permanent or temporary. The female lays its eggs in spring, clustered around the twigs of the foodplants which may be birches (Betula spp.), willows (Salix spp.), poplars (Populus spp.), or elms (Ulmus spp.). The False Comma has one generation a year and because it hibernates as a butterfly, can be seen for much of the year. Habitats: broad-leaved deciduous forests (43%), urban parks and large gardens (12%), towns, villages, industrial sites (12%), tree lines, hedges, small woods, bocage, parkland dehesa (12%), alluvial and very wet forests and brush (12%), mixed woodland (6%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/174215/1


Red List Status

Europe: Least concern

EU: Vulnerable


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

No information provided by the member states.


Threats in Europe

It is unclear what causes the declines in its European range. They might be a part of natural fluctuations, but little is known of the population dynamics of this species.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive, Annexes 2 and 4. More research on the distribution, ecology and population dynamics is needed.

Nymphalis vaualbum. Photo Tom Nygaard Kristensen.

Nymphalis vaualbum


Dos

  • Conduct more research on the distribution, ecology and population dynamics.

Selected references

(Popović and Đurić 2010)

Euphydryas maturna (Linnaeus, 1758)

Name in the Habitats Directive: Hypodryas maturna

E: Scarce Fritillary

F: Le Damier du frêne

D: Kleiner Maivogel, Eschen-Scheckenfalter


Habitat and ecology

The Scarce Fritillary occurs in clearings or forest fringes, where young ash trees are growing in open, mixed woodland or where nature-like fringe structures with abundant Ligustrum are present. The eggs are laid in one batch on a leaf of Ash (Fraxinus excelsior) or Aspen (Populus tremula), preferably at a height of 4 to 10 m. In continental mixed oak forests, Ligustrum vulgare is the most important initial food plant (eggs on 0, 5–1 m). The populations of the Carpathian basin and southeast Europe can use several Fraxinus species as larval foodplant. In lowland riverine gallery forests Fraxinus angustifolia is the most important one, while in white oak forests Fraxinus ornus is used for oviposition. The butterfly generally has a slow, gliding flight but can speed up when necessary. The caterpillars build a nest of silk and leaves and feed together at first, while still quite small. They go into hibernation, remaining in the nest, which usually falls to the ground onto the woodland floor. In spring, they leave the nest and separate, spreading out in search of food. They use a variety of larval foodplants at this stage, including honeysuckle (Lonicera spp.), plantains (Plantago spp.), privets (Ligustrum spp.), Cow-wheat (Melampyrum spp.) or Speedwell (Veronica spp.). They pupate in the litter layer and on tree-trunks. The species has one generation a year, although in Northern Europe some of the caterpillars hibernate a second time before pupating. Habitats: broad-leaved deciduous forests (42%), mixed woodland (18%), alluvial and very wet forests and brush (7%), mesophile grasslands (7%), humid grasslands and tall herb communities (5%), tree lines, hedges, small woods, bocage, parkland dehesa (5%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/10713/1


Red List Status

Europe: Vulnerable

EU: Least concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: bad

Boreal region: favourable

Continental region: bad

Pannonian region: inadequate


Threats in Europe

Typical species of open woodlands and coppice, most threatened by changes in woodland management or the felling or destruction of the forests. A serious potential threat for Euphydryas maturna could also be the fast spread of Ash dieback in Europe caused by the fungus Chalara fraxinea, although it should be noted that the decline of the butterfly started long before the strong and recent spread of the fungus.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annexes 2 and 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. In part of its European range this species depends on specific woodland management. In countries where the species is in decline important habitats should be protected and managed. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme.

In Italy, none of the populations are in Natura 2000 areas. In Estonia the species occurs both in and outside Natura 2000 areas. In France and Germany, it is not known if all populations are in Natura 2000 areas.

Euphydryas maturna. Photo Chris van Swaay.

Euphydryas maturna


Dos

  • Maintain open woodland habitat, preferably by coppicing.
  • Cut part of the ash trees when they reach a height of 5 metres to allow younger saplings to proliferate.
  • Maintain wide and diverse woodland edges and preserve wide open corridors along forest roads.
  • Protect or re-create natural fringe vegetation around clearings and meadows.
  • Keep flower rich meadows near larval habitats with late season hay-cutting.
  • Manage habitats across the whole landscape scale with mosaics of woodlands, clearing and low intensity managed meadows.

Don'ts

  • Remove all ash-trees or their saplings from clearings.
  • Let the forest grow to closed canopy stage.
  • Remove road edge vegetation mechanically during adult stage (from mid May to mid July).
  • Replace deciduous forest with conifer trees.

Selected references

(Cizek and Konvička 2005; Eliasson 1991; Freese et al. 2006; Gros 2002; Konvička et al. 2005; Rakosy et al. in press; Wahlberg 1998; 2001)

Euphydryas aurinia (Rottemburg, 1775)

E: Marsh Fritillary

F: Le Damier de la succise

D: Skabiosen-Scheckenfalter


Habitat and ecology

The Marsh Fritillary occurs in very different types of habitat, like moist, sheltered grasslands, along the edges of raised bogs and on dry, calcareous grasslands. The foodplants are Devil’s-bit Scabious (Succisa pratense), Small Scabious (Scabiosa columbaria), Field Scabious (Knautia arvensis) and teasels (Dipsacus spp.), on the Iberian peninsula Honeysuckle (Lonicera spp.). The eggs are laid in large clumps under the leaves. The caterpillars spin a substantial nest between the leaves of the foodplants, feeding in it and also hibernating communally there. However, later they are solitary and look for places deep in the vegetation in which to pupate. The Marsh Fritillary has one generation a year. This is a very variable species with many subspecies. In Spain and Portugal Euphydryas aurinia beckeri is larger and brighter than most subspecies, with bold, black markings. Euphydryas aurinia debilis is usually found above 1800 m in the Alps and Pyrenees. It is smaller, with a lot of black markings and hardly any orange. Euphydryas aurinia provincialis occurs in the south of France and is pale orange. Euphydryas aurinia hibernica occurs in Ireland and is very distinctive with prominent red and heavy black markings. Habitats: humid grasslands and tall herb communities (26%), mesophile grasslands (21%), dry calcareous grasslands and steppes (9%), broad-leaved deciduous forests (7%), heath and scrub (5%), alpine and subalpine grasslands (5%).

Habitat Euphydryas aurinia, Lithuania. Photo: Chris van Swaay.


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/174182/1


Red List Status

Europe: Least concern

EU: Least concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: inadequate

Atlantic region: bad

Boreal region: inadequate

Continental region: bad

Mediterranean region: unknown

Pannonian region: inadequate


Threats in Europe

Although this species shows a decline in a part of its European range, it is not believed to face major threats at the European scale.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annex 2 and Bern Convention Annex 2. In Denmark, the species only occurs in protected areas. In Estonia the species occurs mostly in Natura 2000 areas, but there are also populations elsewhere. In Finland, France, Germany, Greece and Luxembourg, it is not known if all populations are in Natura 2000 areas. In countries where the species is in decline important habitats should be protected and managed. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme.

Euphydryas aurinia. Photo Chris van Swaay.

Euphydryas aurinia


Dos

  • Manage grassland habitats by low intensity grazing, preferably by cattle or ponies. Sheep grazing is suitable if extensive, especially in high mountains.
  • In lowland damp grasslands, aim for a tussocky structure with a turf height of 8–25 cm at the end of the growing season.
  • On calcareous grasslands, aim for a final turf height of 5–20 cm with some taller patches.
  • In areas where mowing is the main form of management: either cut on rotation so that less than 1/3 of the habitat is cut each year, or prevent the hibernation nests from being damaged by mowing.
  • On sites that have a tradition of occasional burning, direct damage can be minimized by burning very early in the year (January- early March) before larvae emerge from hibernation; avoid burning more than one third of each field per year; manage fires by cutting fire breaks or using existing ditches.
  • Monitor the density of the stock to keep the right level of grazing intensity.
  • In broad-leaved woodland habitats (mainly in Spain, Portugal and southern France), maintain abundant patches of the food-plant (Lonicera species) either growing in open woodland or wood pasture with numerous sunny patches, or in mosaics of woodland and grassland.
  • Manage habitats across the whole landscape scale, especially where habitats are fragmented. The species has large fluctuations in abundance and needs extensive breeding areas to balance local extinctions with colonisations.

Don'ts

  • Intensify or abandon the fields where the species occurs.
  • Overgraze the grassland so that vegetation height is uniform and less than 5cm tall.
  • Burn or mow the whole site, even during a restoration phase.
  • Manage just a single small site.
  • Give up hope if the species becomes extinct on a site. If the surrounding landscape is being managed and colonies survive nearby, it will probably recolonize naturally in due course.

Selected references

(Anthes et al. 2003a; Anthes et al. 2003b; Anthes and Nunner 2006; Barnett and Warren 1995; Betzholtz et al. 2007; Botham et al. 2011; Bulman et al. 2007; Hula et al. 2004; Joyce and Pullin 2003; Junker and Schmitt 2010; Konvička et al. 2003; Liu et al. 2006; Munguira et al. 1997; Porter and Ellis 2011; Saarinen et al. 2005; Schtickzelle et al. 2005; Smee et al. 2011; Stefanescu et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2004; Warren 1994; Warren et al. 1994; Zimmermann et al. 2011a; Zimmermann et al. 2011b)

Apatura metis Freyer, 1829

E: Freyer’s Purple Emperor

D: Donau-Schillerfalter


Habitat and ecology

Freyer’s Purple Emperor is a butterfly of very warm, damp places. The butterflies can be found along wooded riverbanks, with its foodplant, White Willow (Salix alba). The males and females meet each other at the tops of tall trees and the females lay their eggs in small batches at the top of the tree, on leaves in the crown. The caterpillars grow quickly and pupate suspended under a leaf or on a twig. The caterpillars from the generation that follows hibernate. The butterflies have a varied diet. The females visit flowers for nectar, aphids for honeydew and ripe fruit for the sugars. The males are often found on damp ground, on dung and on carrion. The butterflies are also attracted to sap oozing from wounded trees. This species has two generations a year. Habitats: mixed woodland (23%), alluvial and very wet forests and brush (23%), broad-leaved deciduous forests (17%), water-fringe vegetation (17%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/174178/1


Red List Status

Europe: Least concern

EU: Least concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Mediterranean region: unknown

Pannonian region: inadequate

Black sea region (not assessed for article 17, BCE expert opinion): unknown


Threats in Europe

Although this species shows a decline in a part of its European range, it is not believed to face major threats at the European scale.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annex 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. This species occurs in a number of protected areas across its range. One of the largest populations occurs in the low Danube region and Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve. No specific conservation actions are needed at a European level, but in countries where the species is in decline important habitats should be protected and managed. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme.

Apatura metis. Photo Kim Huskens.

Apatura metis


Dos

  • Conduct more research on the ecology and population dynamics of the species.
  • Maintain the riverbanks with White Willow riparian woods and undergrowth vegetation.
  • Maintain the seasonal water dynamics of riparian forests.

Don'ts

  • Fell Salix trees where the species occurs.
  • Remove the undergrowth.
  • Drain or take any other action that reduces the water level (dam building etc.)
  • Maintain constant high water level.

Selected references

(Levente 2005; Slamka 1989; Weidemann 1982a; b)

Lopinga achine (Scopoli, 1763)

E: Woodland Brown

F: La Bacchante

D: Gelbringfalter


Habitat and ecology

The Woodland Brown is found on warm, open places in damp or mesic, deciduous or mixed woods with well-developed shrub and herbaceous layers. These habitats may be flooded in winter. The butterflies rarely visit flowers, preferring to feed on honeydew, moisture on buds and sap that runs from wounded trees. The males often settle on puddles on the ground, while the females tend to stay in the higher scrub. Females and caterpillars are restricted to a narrow zone under the tree and bush canopy along the edges of clearings where the host plant must be present. Eggs are laid on all species of grasses, mostly on false-bromes (Brachypodium spp.) but also on fescues (Festuca spp.), meadow-grasses (Poa spp.), small-reeds (Calamagrostis spp.) and on Sedges (Carex spp.). The half-grown caterpillar hibernates in a grass tussock, where later in the year it also pupates. The Woodland Brown has one generation a year. Habitats: broad-leaved deciduous forests (45%), mixed woodland (29%), alluvial and very wet forests and brush (8%), coniferous woodland (5%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/174299/1


Red List Status

Europe: Vulnerable

EU: Vulnerable


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: bad

Atlantic region: bad

Boreal region: inadequate

Continental region: bad

Mediterranean region: unknown

Pannonian region: bad


Threats in Europe

Changes in woodland or woodland management are the main threats all over the continent. Nevertheless agricultural abandonment and land drainage are important threats in some countries as well, mainly because the habitat was maintained by grazing in a successional change.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annex 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. In countries where the species is in decline important habitats should be protected and managed. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme. It is important to maintain suitable glades by grazing or clearing at regular intervals to prevent overshading of its habitat. To improve overgrown sites small clearings (10–30 m in diameter) should be created, wide enough to allow the sun to reach the ground (comm. Bergman).

Lopinga achine. Photo Kars Veling.

Lopinga achine


Dos

  • Maintain open forest and open wood pastures, which are the main habitat, by coppicing or other forms of traditional woodland management.
  • Maintain wide and diverse woodland edges and preserve wide open corridors along forest roads.
  • Maintain a network of 2–5 year fallow land as breeding habitat in or next to forests.
  • Keep large networks of young succession stages of abandoned meadows with occasional removal of bushes and saplings but never remove all bushes.

Don'ts

  • Change to a more intensive woodland management, especially replacement of deciduous forest with conifer trees.
  • Let the forest grow to closed canopy closure.
  • Remove the bushy gradient zone between forest and grassland.

Selected references

(Bergman 1996; 1999; 2001; Bergman and Kindvall 2004; Bergman and Landin 2001; 2002; Bergman 2000; García-Barros et al. 2006; Jutzeler 1990; Konvička et al. 2008b; Koschuh 2008; Mortera et al. 2011; Seidler 2007)

Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787)

E: False Ringlet

F: l’Œdippe, le Fadet des laîches

D: Moor-Wiesenvögelchen


Habitat and ecology

The False Ringlet is a very local species that is declining at an alarming rate in several countries, though more stable in others. It inhabits low-lying, grassy marshes and reed-beds that are usually situated in the shelter of woodland, creating a warm and humid environment, but also in overgrown dry grasslands in the southern part of its range. The butterflies fly very slowly and hardly ever colonize nearby habitats. The eggs are deposited one by one on the blades of grasses, like meadow-grasses (Poa spp.), rye-grasses (Lolium spp.), hair-grasses (Deschampsia spp.), sedges (Carex spp.) and Purple Moor-grass (Molinea caerulea). The caterpillars hibernate half-grown in the tussock, where they pupate as well. The False Ringlet has one generation a year in June or July depending on altitude. Habitats: humid grasslands and tall herb communities (26%), blanket bogs (20%), raised bogs (13%), fens, transition mires and springs (10%), mixed woodland (6%), broad-leaved deciduous forests (6%), water-fringe vegetation (6%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/5100/1


Red List Status

Europe: Endangered

EU: Least concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: bad

Atlantic region: bad

Continental region: inadequate

Pannonian region: inadequate


Threats in Europe

Agricultural improvements (incl. land drainage) as well as abandonment of grassland habitats are the largest threats for Coenonympha oedippus. Furthermore it survives nowadays in small and fragmented habitats where colonies are threatened by isolation.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annexes 2 and 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. More research is needed urgently on the distribution and ecology of the species. Suitable habitats should be protected and appropriately managed. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme. In Hungary, Austria and France, the species only occurs in protected areas.

Coenonympha oedippus. Photo Kars Veling.

Coenonympha oedippus


Dos

  • Use extensive grassland management with rotational mowing.
  • Keep the habitat networks dense to maintain metapopulations.
  • Maintain large areas of suitable habitat with minimum level of management (remove bushes and/or reeds every few years).

Don'ts

  • Drain or take any other action that sinks the water level at occupied sites.
  • Abandon low intensity management of the habitats.
  • Mow during flight period of the adults and the entire suitable habitat at once
  • Burn dry grass during spring.

Selected references

(Bonelli et al. 2010; Bräu et al. 2010; Čelik 2004; Čelik and Verovnik 2010; Čelik et al. 2009; Dierks 2006; Dušej et al. 2010; Lhonoré and Lagarde 1999; Örvössy et al. 2010; Šašic 2010; Sielezniew et al. 2010)

Coenonympha hero (Linnaeus, 1761)

E: Scarce Heath

F: La Mélibée, le Fadet de l’élyme

D: Wald-Wiesenvögelchen


Habitat and ecology

The Scarce Heath occurs in damp to wet grassy meadows in or at the edges of woods. Sometimes, they occur away from woods in drier places or in flower-rich grassland. The butterflies are fond of settling in grass and do not fly far, nor very often. Among the grasses they use as food are Tufted Hair-grass (Deschampsia cespitosa) and Bearded Couch (Elymus caninus). When half-grown, the caterpillar hibernates in a grass tussock, later also pupating there. This species has one generation a year. Habitats: humid grasslands and tall herb communities (26%), mixed woodland (19%), broad-leaved deciduous forests (14%), mesophile grasslands (9%), fens, transition mires and springs (7%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/174391/1


Red List Status

Europe: Vulnerable

EU: Vulnerable


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: favourable

Atlantic region: bad

Boreal region: bad

Continental region: bad


Threats in Europe

Chief threats are from drainage, agricultural improvements and changing grassland and woodland management. This has caused strong declines and even local extinctions in many countries in Western and Central Europe.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annex 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. This species occurs in a number of protected areas across its range. In Western and Central European countries where the species is in decline, important habitats should be protected and managed. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme.

Coenonympha hero. Photo Kars Veling

Coenonympha hero


Dos

  • In areas where the species still occurs: try to continue careful management while taking into account that the species is very sensitive to small changes in the environment and management.
  • In case of gradual encroachment, remove bushes in the sensitive wet fallow habitats only once within a decade.
  • Maintain “traditional” forms of forest management, such as coppicing and clear cutting.

Don'ts

  • Drain the area.
  • Intensify or abandon the areas where it occurs.
  • Disturb in higher frequencies (e.g. for scrub removal).

Selected references

(Cassel-Lundhagen and Sjögren-Gulve 2007; Cassel-Lundhagen et al. 2008; Cassel and Tammaru 2003; Cassel et al. 2001; Ortner and Lechner 2007; Pretscher 2001; Steiner and Hermann 1999; Thust et al. 2001; Wiemers 2007)

Erebia christi Rätzer, 1890

E: Rätzer’s Ringlet

F: Le Moiré du Simplon


Habitat and ecology

Rätzer’s Ringlet is found on steep, sunny slopes on acid soil with patches of grassy vegetation and rocks and scattered larches or fir trees. Its one of the rarest European butterflies, having not more than six or seven populations. The butterflies often bask in the sun with their wings wide open. The males congregate regularly on damp ground. The females visit different nectar plants and are especially fond of thyme. They lay their eggs on the dry grass stems of Sheep’s Fescue (Festuca ovina). Before completing their development, the caterpillars hibernate twice. Detailed habitat descriptions are not available. This is a European endemic species.


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/39491/0


Red List Status

Europe: Vulnerable

EU: Vulnerable


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: bad


Threats in Europe

The species has a very limited global range, where it is mainly threatened by habitat destruction. The species is popular with collectors, but this is not the main reason for the decline.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annexes 2 and 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. More research is needed on the distribution and ecology of the species. Suitable habitats should be protected and appropriately managed. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme. In Italy, not all populations are in Natura 2000 areas.

Erebia christi. Photo Matt Rowlings.

Erebia christi


Dos

  • Protect all current and potential habitats and prevent road works or other building development.
  • Restore habitats that were destroyed by road construction.
  • Maintain traditional management of habitat.
  • Monitor of all populations.

Don'ts

  • Destroy any of the remaining sites as a result of building activities or road works.
  • Collect specimens, in particularly for commercial reasons.

Selected references

(Leigheb et al. 1998; Lepidopterologen-Arbeitsgruppe 1987)

Erebia sudetica Staudinger, 1861

E: Sudeten Ringlet

F: Le Moiré des Sudètes

D: Karpathen-Mohrenfalter


Habitat and ecology

The Sudeten Ringlet occurs on alpine and sub-alpine grasslands, especially those near the tree-line. The butterflies are most numerous on damp grasslands with tall grasses and flowering plants, but they also reproduce on dry grassland. Although Sweet Vernal-grass (Anthoxanthum odoratum) is probably the most important foodplant, other grasses, such as Annual Meadow-grass (Poa annua), are also used. The species has one generation a year and passes the winter as a caterpillar. Habitats: alpine and subalpine grasslands (37%), coniferous woodland (25%), mixed woodland (12%), inland cliffs and exposed rocks (12%), mesophile grasslands (12%). This is a European endemic species.


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/39492/0


Red List Status

Europe: Vulnerable

EU: Vulnerable


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: unknown

Continental region: bad


Threats in Europe

Main threats are intensified grazing, abandonment and afforestation. In view of its limited distribution it might get threatened in the long run by climate change. As the species is not treated in the Climatic Risk Atlas (Settele et al. 2008) there is no information on the possible change of the climate envelope.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annex 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. More research is needed on the distribution and ecology of the species. Suitable habitats should be protected and appropriately managed. The effects of conservation actions should be monitored by a Butterfly Monitoring Scheme. In the Czech Republic, Poland and Romania, the species only occurs in protected areas.

Erebia sudetica. Photo Neil Thompson.

Erebia sudetica


Dos

  • Maintain traditional management of habitat.
  • Prevent encroachment, but allow succession in small areas.
  • Try to create a mosaic of different land-uses with different mowing regimes, grazing duration, etc.
  • On pastures, maintain extensive grazing, or switch to extensive grazing.
  • On meadows, mow late after 1 August, but adjust according to altitude.
  • Maintain extensive use of marginal areas (steep slopes, inaccessible areas): mowing every two to three years or only one half to one third of the area in a year. Also cut the scrub to prevent over-shading of habitat.
  • In countries with isolated occurrence, the populations should be monitored nationwide.
  • Important populations should be monitored.
  • Local authorities, farmers and other interested parties should be informed of the importance of the species.

Don'ts

  • Destroy populations by building activities, road works or winter sport activities.
  • Allow intensive or prolonged grazing.
  • Permit eutrophication or use of chemical fertilizers. Manure of the huts should not be deployed on the habitats of the species.
  • Allow structural changes (e.g. slopes) or other interventions (eg artificial snow-making) in the current and potential habitats.
  • Allow afforestation of subalpine and mountainous grasslands.

Selected references

(Kuras et al. 2003; Kuras et al. 2001a; Kuras et al. 2001b; Lepidopterologen-Arbeitsgruppe 1987; Wermeille et al. 2007)

Erebia polaris Staudinger, 1871

Name in the Habitats Directive: Erebia medusa polaris

E: Arctic Woodland Ringlet


Habitat and ecology

The Arctic Woodland Ringlet is often found on damp grasslands, but it also occurs on dry grasslands and in waste places, often where there is shelter from birches, or juniper bushes. Unlike the other ringlets in Lapland, the Arctic Ringlet (Erebia disa) and the Lapland Ringlet (Erebia embla), this species does not occur on peat bogs. It lays its eggs on Sheep’s-Fescue (Festuca ovina), Wood Millet (Milium effusum) and Swamp Meadow-grass (Poa palustris). The caterpillars take nearly two years to develop. Habitats: dry siliceous grasslands (100%).


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/174378/1


Red List Status

Europe: Least concern

EU: Least concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: inadequate


Threats in Europe

This species is not believed to face major threats at the European level in this part of its distribution.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annex 2 (under the name Erebia medusa polaris).


Erebia polaris


Dos and Don'ts

Unknown, research is urgently needed.


Selected references

(Eliasson et al. 2005; Henriksen and Kreutzer 1982; Rambring 1969)

Erebia calcaria Lorković, 1953

E: Lorkovic’s Brassy Ringlet

F: Le Moiré de Carniole

D: Karawanken-Mohrenfalter Lorković’s Schillernder Mohrenfalter


Habitat and ecology

Lorkovic’s Brassy Ringlet inhabits southern exposed slopes with alpine grassland interspersed with rocks. Screes without vegetation or only a few grass tussocks cannot serve as habitat. These butterflies are only active when the sun is shining. They fly close to the ground, visiting flowers from time to time and spend much of their time on rocks, resting. The female deposits her eggs on dry grass stalks, just above the ground. The caterpillars feed on Mat-grass (Nardus stricta) and on different fescues (Festuca spp.) and Sesleria species. Habitats: alpine and subalpine grasslands (50%), screes (25%), inland cliffs and exposed rocks (25%). This is a European endemic species.


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/173285/0


Red List Status

Europe: Least concern

EU: Least concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: inadequate


Threats in Europe

Although this is a European endemic with a restricted range, this species is not believed to face major threats at the European level.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annexes 2 and 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. In Slovenia, the species only occurs in protected areas. In Austria, none of the populations are in Natura 2000 areas.

Erebia calcaria. Photo Tom Nygaard Kristensen.

Erebia calcaria


Dos

  • Maintain traditional land uses (i.e. extensive grazing with sheep or goats) in mountain areas.

Don'ts

  • Build new tourist developments, especially related to ski sports in areas where the species is present.
  • Graze with cattle. Even low intensity grazing with cattle makes irreparable damage to short turf vegetation important as the larval habitat.
  • Overgraze the sites, especially those with strong populations.

Selected references

(De Groot et al. 2009; Rakosy and Jutzeler 2005)

Melanargia arge (Sulzer, 1776)

E: Italian Marbled White

F: L’Échiquier d’Italie


Habitat and ecology

The Italian Marbled White occurs locally in small populations on rocky, calcareous places on patches of dry, grassy vegetation among loose thickets of Prickly Juniper (Juniperus oxycedrus), Rosa sempervirens, the Bramble (Rubus ulmifolius) and Thymus capitatus, with a few scattered trees. The caterpillars feed on grasses such as Feather Grass (Stipa pinnata) and the false-brome (Brachypodium retusum). The Italian Marbled White has one generation a year which only flies for three weeks. Detailed habitat descriptions are not available. This is a European endemic species.


Red List link: http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/173235/0


Red List Status

Europe: Least concern

EU: Least concern


Conservation Status in EU in 2007 (Article 17 assessment)

Alpine region: favourable

Mediterranean region: inadequate


Threats in Europe

This species is not believed to face major threats at the European level.


Conservation actions

The species is listed on the Habitats Directive Annexes 2 and 4 and Bern Convention Annex 2. This species occurs in a number of protected areas across its range. No specific conservation actions are needed at a European level. In Italy, not all populations are in Natura 2000 areas.

Melanargia arge. Photo Matt Rowlings.

Melanargia arge


Don'ts

  • Large scale burning of habitats.

Selected references

(Nardelli and Benedetto 1994; Russo 1991; 1994)

Material

Information on threats and conservation actions were collected via national experts for the Red List of butterflies in Europe (Van Swaay et al. 2010, 2011), the detailed habitat descriptions from Van Swaay et al. (2006).

Acknowledgements

We thank Matt Rowlings, Tom Nygaard Kristensen, Neil Thompson, Kars Veling, Kim Huskens, Jaap Bouwman and Albert Vliegenthart for providing additional photos. This report was funded by Butterfly Conservation Europe under core funding from the European Union. The opinions expressed therein are those of the Contractor only and do not represent the EU’s official position. We acknowledge the support of the European Commission Framework Programme (FP) 6 via the Integrated Project ALARM (GOCE-CT-2003- 506675; Settele et al. 2005a) and FP 7 via the Integrated Project SCALES (grant 226852; Henle et al. 2010) and the Collaborative Project STEP (grant 244090; Potts et al. 2011). We also received support from the project CLIMIT, funded by DLR-BMBF (Germany), NERC and DEFRA (UK), ANR (France), Formas (Sweden) and Swedish EPA (Sweden) through the FP6 BiodivERsA Eranet (Settele and Kühn 2009; Thomas et al. 2009).

References
Anthes N, Fartmann T, Hermann G (2003a) Wie lässt sich der Rückgang des Goldenen Scheckenfalters (Euphydryas aurinia) in Mitteleuropa stoppen? Erkenntnisse aus populationsökologischen Studien in voralpinen Niedermoorgebieten und der Arealentwicklung in Deutschland. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 35: 279-287.
Anthes N, Fartmann T, Hermann G, Kaule G (2003b) Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure – the key for successful management of pre-alpine Euphydryas aurinia colonies. Journal of Insect Conservation 7: 175-185. doi: 10.1023/A:1027330422958
Anthes N, Nunner A (2006) Populationsökologische Grundlagen für das Management des Goldenen Scheckenfalters, Euphydryas aurinia, in Mitteleuropa. In: Fartmann T, Hermann G (Eds). Larvalökologie von Tagfaltern und Widderchen in Mitteleuropa. Westfälisches Museum für Naturkunde, Münster: 323-352.
Anton C, Musche M, Settele J (2007a) Spatial patterns of host exploitation in a larval parasitoid of the predatory dusky large blue Maculinea nausithous. Basic and Applied Ecology 8: 66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2006.03.006
Anton C, Zeisset I, Musche M, Durka W, Boomsma JJ, Settele J (2007b) Population structure of a large blue butterfly and its specialist parasitoid in a fragmented landscape. Molecular Ecology 16: 3828-3838. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03441.x
Anton C, Musche M, Hula V, Settele J (2008) Myrmica host-ants limit the density of the ant-predatory large blue Maculinea nausithous. Journal of Insect Conservation 12: 511-517. doi: 10.1007/s10841-007-9091-8
Ashton S, Gutiérrez D, Wilson RJ (2009) Effects of temperature and elevation on habitat use by a rare mountain butterfly: implications for species responses to climate change. Ecological Entomology 34: 437-446. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2008.01068.x
Aubert J, Descimon H, Michel F (1996) Population biology and conservation of the Corsican swallowtail butterfly Papilio hospiton Gene. Biological Conservation 78: 247-255.
Aubert J, Barascud B, Descimon H, Michel F (1997) Ecology and genetics of interspecific hybridization in the swallowtails, Papilio hospiton Gene and P. machaon L, in Corsica (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60: 467-492.
Barnett LK, Warren MS (1995) Species Action Plan: Marsh Fritillary, Euphydryas aurinia. Butterfly Conservation, Wareham, Dorset, UK, 29 pp.
Batáry P, Örvössy N, Kőrösi Á, Valyi Nagy M, Peregovits L (2007) Microhabitat preferences of Maculinea teleius (Lepidoptera : Lycaenidae) in a mosaic landscape. European Journal of Entomology 104: 731-736.
Batáry P, Örvössy N, Kőrösi Á, Peregovits L (2008) Egg Distribution of the Southern Festoon (Zerynthia polyxena) (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae). Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 54: 401-410.
Batáry P, Kőrösi Á, Örvössy N, Kover S, Peregovits L (2009) Species-specific distribution of two sympatric Maculinea butterflies across different meadow edges. Journal of Insect Conservation 13: 223-230. doi: 10.1007/s10841-008-9158-1
Bauerfeind SS, Theisen A, Fischer K (2009) Patch occupancy in the endangered butterfly Lycaena helle in a fragmented landscape: effects of habitat quality, patch size and isolation. Journal of Insect Conservation 13: 271-277. doi: 10.1007/s10841-008-9166-1
Bereczki J, Tóth JP, Tóth A, Batori E, Pecsenye K, Varga Z (2011) The genetic structure of phenologically differentiated Large Blue (Maculinea arion) populations (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in the Carpathian Basin. European Journal of Entomology 108: 519-527.
Bergman KO (1996) Oviposition, host plant choice and survival of a grass feeding butterfly, the Woodland Brown (Lopinga achine); (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 35: 9-21.
Bergman KO (1999) Habitat utilization by Lopinga achine (Nymphalidae : Satyrinae) larvae and ovipositing females: implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 88: 69-74
Bergman KO (2000) Oviposition, host plant choice and survival of a grass feeding butterfly, the Woodland Brown (Lopinga achine) (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 35: 9-21.
Bergman KO (2001) Population dynamics and the importance of habitat management for conservation of the butterfly Lopinga achine. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 1303-1313.
Bergman KO, Kindvall O (2004) Population viability analysis of the butterfly Lopinga achine in a changing landscape in Sweden. Ecography 27: 49-58.
Bergman KO, Landin J (2001) Distribution of occupied and vacant sites and migration of Lopinga achine (Nymphalidae : Satyrinae) in a fragmented landscape. Biological Conservation 102: 183-190.
Bergman KO, Landin J (2002) Population structure and movements of a threatened butterfly (Lopinga achine) in a fragmented landscape in Sweden. Biological Conservation 108: 361-369.
Bergström A (2005) Oviposition site preferences of the threatened butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne – implications for conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation 9: 21-27. doi: 10.1007/s10841-004-3204-4
Betzholtz PE, Ehrig A, Lindeborg M, Dinnetz P (2007) Food plant density, patch isolation and vegetation height determine occurrence in a Swedish metapopulation of the marsh fritillary Euphydryas aurinia (Rottemburg, 1775) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Journal of Insect Conservation 11: 343-350. doi: 10.1007/s10841-006-9048-3
Bink FA (1986) Acid stress in Rumex hydrolapathum (Polygonaceae) and its influence on the phytophage Lycaena dispar (Lepidoptera; Lycaenidae). Oecologia 70: 447-451. doi: 10.1007/BF00379510
Bollino M, Sala G (2004) Synopsis of Papilio alexanor Esper, 1799: an updated revue of its taxonomy and biology. University of Chicago, Chicago.
Bonelli S, Canterino S, Balletto E (2010) Ecology of Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Italy. Oedippus 26: 25-30.
Botham MS, Ash D, Aspey N, Bourn NAD, Bulman CR, Roy DB, Swain J, Zannese A, Pywell RF (2011) The effects of habitat fragmentation on niche requirements of the marsh fritillary, Euphydryas aurinia, (Rottemburg, 1775) on calcareous grasslands in southern UK. Journal of Insect Conservation 15: 269-277. doi: 10.1007/s10841-010-9344-9
Bräu M, Dolek M, Stettmer C (2010) Habitat requirements, larval development and food preferences of the German population of the False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) – Research on the ecological needs to develop management tools. Oedippus 26: 41-51.
Brommer JE, Fred MS (1999) Movement of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo related to host plant and nectar plant patches. Ecological Entomology 24: 125-131.
Bulman CR, Wilson RJ, Holt AR, Galvez Bravo L, Early RI, Warren MS, Thomas CD (2007) Minimum viable metapopulation size, extinction debt, and the conservation of a declining species. Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America 17: 1460-1473.
Casacci LP, Witek M, Barbero F, Patricelli D, Solazzo G, Balletto E, Bonelli S (2011) Habitat preferences of Maculinea arion and its Myrmica host ants: implications for habitat management in Italian Alps. Journal of Insect Conservation 15: 103-110. doi: 10.1007/s10841-010-9327-x
Cassel A, Tammaru T (2003) Allozyme variability in central, peripheral and isolated populations of the scarce heath (Coenonympha hero : Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae): Implications for conservation. Conservation Genetics 4: 83-93.
Cassel A, Windig J, Nylin S, Wiklund C (2001) Effects of population size and food stress on fitness-related characters in the scarce heath, a rare butterfly in western Europe. Conservation Biology 15: 1667-1673.
Cassel-Lundhagen A, Sjögren-Gulve P (2007) Limited dispersal by the rare scarce heath butterfly—potential consequences for population persistence. Journal of Insect Conservation 11: 113-121. doi: 10.1007/s10841-006-9023-z
Cassel-Lundhagen A, Sjogren-Gulve P, Berglind SA (2008) Effects of patch characteristics and isolation on relative abundance of the scarce heath butterfly Coenonympha hero (Nymphalidae). Journal of Insect Conservation 12: 477-482. doi: 10.1007/s10841-007-9083-8
Čelik T (2004) Population dynamics of endangered species Coenonympha oedippus Fabricius, 1787, on the Ljubljansko barje (Slovenia). Acta Entomologica Slovenica 12: 99-114.
Čelik T, Verovnik R (2010) Distribution, habitat preferences and population ecology of the False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Slovenia. Oedippus 26: 7-15.
Čelik T, Vreš B, Seliškar A (2009) Determinants of within-patch microdistribution and movements of endangered butterfly Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). Hacquetia 8: 115-128.
Cianchi R, Ungaro A, Marini M, Bullini L (2003) Differential patterns of hybridization and introgression between the swallowtails Papilio machaon and P. hospiton from Sardinia and Corsica islands (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae). Molecular Ecology 12: 1461-1471. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01813.x
Cizek O, Konvička M (2005) What is a patch in a dynamic metapopulation? Mobility of an endangered woodland butterfly, Euphydryas maturna. Ecography 28: 791-800.
Coutsis JG (2008) Pseudophilotes bavius casimiri, the most differentiated subspecies of the P. bavius species-group. Pseudophilotes fatma, a distinct species (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae, Scolitantidini. Phegea 36: 121-125.
Crisan A, Sitar C, Craioveanu C, Rakosy L (2011) The protected Transylvanian Blue (Pseudophilotes bavius hungarica): new information on the morphology and biology. Nota lepidopterologica 34: 163-168
Dapporto L (2010) Speciation in Mediterranean refugia and post-glacial expansion of Zerynthia polyxena (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 48: 229-237. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2009.00550.x
David C, Sanetra M (1994) Verbreitung, Biologie und Autökologie von Papilio alexanor Esper 1799 in der südwestlichen Alpenregion (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, Neue Folge 15: 1-24.
De Groot M, Rebeusek F, Grobelnik V, Govedic M, Salamun A, Verovnik R (2009) Distribution modelling as an approach to the conservation of a threatened alpine endemic butterfly (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). European Journal of Entomology 106: 77-84.
Deschamps-Cottin M, Roux M, Descimon H (1997) Larval foodplant efficiency and laying preferences in Parnassius apollo L. (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae). Comptes Rendus De L'Academie Des Sciences Serie III-Sciences De La Vie-Life Sciences 320: 399-406.
Dierks A, Fischer K (2009) Habitat requirements and niche selection of Maculinea nausithous and M. teleius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) within a large sympatric metapopulation. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 3663-3676. doi: 10.1007/s10531-009-9670-y
Dierks K (2006) Beobachtungen zur Larvalbiologie von Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) im Südwesten Frankreichs (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). Entomologische Zeitschrift 116: 186-188.
Dincă V, Cuvelier S, Molgaard MS (2011) Distribution and conservation status of Pseudophilotes bavius (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Dobrogea (south-eastern Romania). Phegea 39: 59-67
Dolek M, Freese A, Geyer A, Stetter H (2005) The decline of Colias myrmidone at the western edge of its range and notes on its habitat requirements. Biologia 60: 607-610.
Dover J, Settele J (2009) The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review. Journal of Insect Conservation 13: 3-27. doi: 10.1007/s10841-008-9135-8
Dover J, Spencer S, Collins S, Hadjigeorgiou I, Rescia A (2011a) Grassland butterflies and low intensity farming in Europe. Journal of Insect Conservation 15: 129-137. doi: 10.1007/s10841-010-9332-0
Dover J, Warren M, Shreeve TG (Eds) (2011b) Lepidoptera conservation in a changing world: Butterfly Conservation’s 6th International Symposium Reading: The 2010 target and beyond for Lepidoptera. Springer Science + Business Media b.v., 383 pp.
Drechsler M, Watzold F, Johst K, Bergmann H, Settele J (2007) A model-based approach for designing cost-effective compensation payments for conservation of endangered species in real landscapes. Biological Conservation 140: 174-186.
Duffey E (1968) Ecological studies on the large copper butterfly Lycaena dispar HAW. batavus OBTH. at Woodwalton Fen National Nature Reserve, Huntingdonshire. Journal of Applied Ecology 5: 69-96.
Dušej G, Wermeille E, Carron G, Ziegler H (2010) Concerning the situation of the False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Switzerland. Oedippus 26: 38-40.
Eliasson C (1991) Studier av boknatfjarilens, Euphydryas maturna (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae), forekomst och biologi i Vastmanland = Studies on the beech web butterfly, Euphydryas maturna (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae), occurrence and biology in Vastmanland. Entomologisk Tidskrift 112: 113-124.
Eliasson CU, Ryrholm N, Holmer M, Jilg K, Gärdenfors U (2005) Nationalnyckeln till Sveriges flora och fauna. Fjärilar: Dagfjärilar. Hesperiidae - Nymphalidae. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala, 407 pp.
Elmes GW, Thomas JA (1992) Complexity of Species Conservation in Managed Habitats - Interaction between Maculinea Butterflies and Their Ant Hosts. Biodiversity and Conservation 1: 155-169.
Ernst M (1999) Das Lebensraumspektrum der Ameisenbläulinge Maculinea nausithous und Maculinea teleius im Regierungsbezirk Darmstadt (Hessen) sowie Vorschläge zur Erhaltung ihrer Lebensräume. Natur und Landschaft 74: 299-305.
Finger A, Schmitt T, Zachos FE, Meyer M, Assmann T, Habel JC (2009) The genetic status of the violet copper Lycaena helle - a relict of the cold past in times of global warming. Ecography 32: 382-390. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05766.x
Fischer K, Beinlich B, Plachter H (1999) Population structure, mobility and habitat preferences of the Violet Copper Lycaena helle (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Western Germany: Implications for conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation 3: 43-52. doi: 10.1023/a:1009630506216
Fred MS, Brommer JE (2003) Influence of Habitat Quality and Patch Size on Occupancy and Persistence in two Populations of the Apollo Butterfly (Parnassius apollo). Journal of Insect Conservation 7: 85-98. doi: 10.1023/a:1025522603446
Fred MS, Brommer JE (2005) The decline and current distribution of Parnassius apollo (Linnaeus) in Finland; the role of Cd. Annales Zoologici Fennici 42: 69-79.
Fred MS, Brommer JE (2010) Olfaction and vision in host plant location by Parnassius apollo larvae: consequences for survival and dynamics. Animal Behaviour 79: 313-320. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.11.001
Fred MS, O’Hara RB, Brommer JE (2006) Consequences of the spatial configuration of resources for the distribution and dynamics of the endangered Parnassius apollo butterfly. Biological Conservation 130: 183-192. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.012
Freese A, Dolek M, Geyer A, Stetter H (2005) Biology, distribution, and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in Bavaria and its situation in other European countries. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 38: 51-58.
Freese A, Beneš J, Bolz R, Cizek O, Dolek M, Geyer A, Gros P, Konvička M, Liegl A, Stettmer C (2006) Habitat use of the endangered butterfly Euphydryas maturna and forestry in Central Europe. Animal Conservation 9: 388-397. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00045.x
Freina JJd (1983) Papilio alexanor orientalis Romanoff, 1894: Angaben zur Biologie, Verbreitung und zur Frage der Berechtigung dieses Taxons (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae). Atalanta 14: 23-30.
García-Barros E, Munguira ML, Martín Cano J (2006) Lopinga achine (Scopoli, 1763). In: Verdú JR, Galante E (Eds). Libro Rojo de los Invertebrados de España. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid: 243-244.
Gascoigne-Pees M, Trew D, Pateman J, Verovnik R (2008) The distribution, life cycle, ecology and present status of Leptidea morsei (Fenton 1882) in Slovenia with additional observations from Romania (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, Neue Folge 29: 113-121.
Geissler-Strobel S (1999) Landschaftsplanungsorientierte Studien zu Ökologie, Verbreitung, Gefährdung und Schutz der Wiesenknopf-Ameisen-Bläulinge Glaucopsyche (Maculinea) nausithous und Glaucopsyche (Maculinea) teleius. Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, Neue Folge 44: 1-105.
Geyer A, Dolek M (2001) Das Artenhilfsprogramm für den Apollofalter (Parnassius apollo) in Bayern. In: Schäffler B (Ed). Artenhilfsprogramme Beiträge zum Artenschutz 23. Bayerisches Landesamt für Umweltschutz, Augsburg: 301-317.
Gil-T. F (2007) The correct hostplant of Polyommatus golgus (Hübner, 1813): Anthyllis vulneraria pseudoarundana H. Lindb. (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Atalanta 38: 199-202.
Gorbach VV, Kabanen DN (2010) Spatial organization of the Clouded Apollo population (Parnassius mnemosyne) in Onega Lake Basin. Entomological Review 90: 11-22.
Gratton P, Konopinski MK, Sbordoni V (2008) Pleistocene evolutionary history of the Clouded Apollo (Parnassius mnemosyne): genetic signatures of climate cycles and a ‘time-dependent’ mitochondrial substitution rate. Molecular Ecology 17: 4248-4262. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03901.x
Grill A, Cleary DFR, Stettmer C, Bräu M, Settele J (2008) A mowing experiment to evaluate the influence of management on the activity of host ants of Maculinea butterflies. Journal of Insect Conservation 12: 617-627. doi: 10.1007/s10841-007-9098-1
Gros P (2002) Habitatmanagement FFH-relevanter Tagfalterarten: Grundlagenstudie für die Entwicklung eines Artenschutzprogrammes zur Förderung von Metapopulationssystemen des Eschen-Scheckenfalters (Euphydryas maturna Linnaeus, 1758). Salzburg: Universität Salzburg.
Habel JC, Augenstein B, Meyer M, Nève G, Rödder D, Assmann T (2010a) Population Genetics and Ecological Niche Modelling Reveal High Fragmentation and Potential Future Extinction of the Endangered Relict Butterfly Lycaena helle. In: Habel JC, Assmann T (Eds). Relict Species. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 417-439. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-92160-8_25
Habel JC, Schmitt T, Meyer M, Finger A, Rodder D, Assmann T, Zachos FE (2010b) Biogeography meets conservation: the genetic structure of the endangered lycaenid butterfly Lycaena helle (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 101: 155-168.
Habel JC, Finger A, Schmitt T, Nève G (2011a) Survival of the endangered butterfly Lycaena helle in a fragmented environment: Genetic analyses over 15 years. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 49: 25-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2010.00575.x
Habel JC, Rodder D, Schmitt T, Neve G (2011b) Global warming will affect the genetic diversity and uniqueness of Lycaena helle populations. Global Change Biology 17: 194-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02233.x
Henle K, Kunin W, Schweiger O, Schmeller DS, Grobelnik V, Matsinos Y, Pantis J, Penev L, Potts SG, Ring I, Simila J, Tzanopoulos J, van den Hove S, Baguette M, Clobert J, Excoffier L, Framstad E, Grodzinska-Jurczak M, Lengyel S, Marty P, Moilanen A, Porcher E, Storch D, Steffan-Dewenter I, Sykes MT, Zobel M, Settele J (2010) Securing the Conservation of Biodiversity across Administrative Levels and Spatial, Temporal, and Ecological Scales Research Needs and Approaches of the SCALES Project. Gaia-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 19: 187-193.
Henriksen HJ, Kreutzer I (1982) The butterflies of Scandinavia in Nature. Skandinavisk Bogvorlag, Odense, 215 pp.
Höttinger H (2003) Neue Erkenntnisse zur Verbreitung, Ökologie und Gefährdung des Osterluzeifalters Zerynthia polyxena (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775) in Österreich mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Burgenlandes (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Beiträge zur Entomofaunistik 4: 89-105.
Höttinger H (2004) Verbreitung, Ökologie, Gefährdung und Schutz des Senf-Weißlings Leptidea morsei (Fenton, 1881) in Österreich, insbesondere im Burgenland (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Joannea Zoologie 6: 187-206.
Hula V, Konvička M, Pavlicko A, Fric Z (2004) Marsh Fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in the Czech Republic : monitoring, metapopulation structure, and conservation of an endangered butterfly. Entomologica Fennica 15: 231-241.
Johst K, Drechsler M, Thomas J, Settele J (2006) Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 333-342.
Joyce DA, Pullin AS (2003) Conservation implications of the distribution of genetic diversity at different scales: a case study using the marsh fritillary butterfly (Euphydryas aurinia). Biological Conservation 114: 453-461. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00087-9
Junker M, Schmitt T (2010) Demography, dispersal and movement pattern of Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) at the Iberian Peninsula: an alarming example in an increasingly fragmented landscape? Journal of Insect Conservation 14: 237–246. doi: 10.1007/s10841-009-9250-1
Jutzeler D (1990) Zur Bedeutung von Pfeifengrasarten (Molinia spp.) als Existenzgrundlage von Lopinga achine (Scopoli, 1763) und Coenonympha tullia (Müller, 1764); (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). Mitteilungen aus der Entomologischen Gesellschaft Basel, N F 40: 94-110.
Jutzeler D, Leigheb G, Bros Ed (1997a) Écologie et élevage de Fabriciana elisa (Godart, 1823), endémique de Sardaigne et de Corse (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Linneana belgica 16: 63-69.
Jutzeler D, Rakosy L, Bros Ed (1997b) Observation et èlevage de Pseudophilotes bavius (Eversmann, 1832) des environs de Cluj; distribution de cette espèce en Roumanie. Une nouvelle plante nouricière de Colias alfacariensis (Ribbe, 1905). Bulletin de la Societè Entomologique de Mulhouse 53: 23-30.
Kahlheber D (1976) Beitrag zur Biologie von Papilio alexanor Esp. Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, Alte Folge 1: 49-51.
König F (1992) Morphologische, biologische und ökologische Daten über Philotes bavius hungarica Diòszeghy 1913. Lepidoptera. Lycaenidae. Entomologische Zeitschrift 102: 168-172
Konvička M, Kuras T (1999) Population Structure, Behaviour and Selection of Oviposition Sites of an Endangered Butterfly, Parnassius mnemosyne, in Litovelské Pomoravíl. Czech Republic. Journal of Insect Conservation 3: 211-223. doi: 10.1023/a:1009641618795
Konvička M, Duchoslav M, Haraštová M, Beneš J, Foldynová S, Jirku M, Kuras T (2001) Habitat utilization and behaviour of adult Parnassius mnemosyne (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in the Litovelské Pomoraví, Czech Republic. Nota lepidopterologica 24: 39-51.
Konvička M, Hula V, Fric Z (2003) Habitat of pre-hibernating larvae of the endangered butterfly Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera : Nymphalidae): What can be learned from vegetation composition and architecture? European Journal of Entomology 100: 313–322.
Konvička M, Cizek O, Filipova L, Fric Z, Beneš J, Krupka M, Zamecnik J, Dockalova Z (2005) For whom the bells toll: Demography of the last population of the butterfly Euphydryas maturna in the Czech Republic. Biologia 60: 551-557.
Konvička M, Vlasanek P, Hauck D (2006) Absence of forest mantles creates ecological traps for Parnassius mnemosyne (Papilionidae). Nota lepidopterologica 29: 145-152.
Konvička M, Beneš J, Cizek O, Kopecek F, Konvička O, Vitaz L (2008a) How too much care kills species: Grassland reserves, agri-environmental schemes and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera : Pieridae) from its former stronghold. Journal of Insect Conservation 12: 519-525. doi: 10.1007/s10841-007-9092-7
Konvička M, Novak J, Beneš J, Fric Z, Bradley J, Keil P, Hrcek J, Chobot K, Marhoul P (2008b) The last population of the Woodland Brown butterfly (Lopinga achine) in the Czech Republic: habitat use, demography and site management. Journal of Insect Conservation 12: 549-560. doi: 10.1007/s10841-007-9087-4
Koschuh A (2008) Neues zu Verbreitung, Lebensraum und Lebensweise von Lopinga achine (SCOPOLI, 1763) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) in der Steiermark und angrenzenden Gebieten. Beiträge zur Entomofaunistik 9: 107-122.
Kudrna O, Harpke A, Lux K, Pennerstorfer J, Schweiger O, Settele J, Wiemers M (2011) Distribution Atlas of Butterflies in Europe. Gesellschaft für Schmetterlingsschutz e.V., Halle, 576 pp.
Kühne L, Haase E, Wachlin V, Gelbrecht J, Dommain R (2001) Die FFH-Art Lycaena dispar – Ökologie, Verbreitung, Gefährdung und Schutz im norddeutschen Tiefland (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Märkische Entomologische Nachrichten 3: 1-32.
Kuras T, Beneš J, Konvička M (2001a) Behaviour and within-habitat distribution of adult Erebia sudetica sudetica, endemic of the Hrubý Jeseník Mts., Czech Republic (Nymphalidae, Satyrinae). Nota lepidopterologica 24: 69-83.
Kuras T, Beneš J, Konvička M, Honc L (2001b) Life histories of Erebia sudetica sudetica and E. epiphron silesiana with description of immature stages. Atalanta 32: 187-196
Kuras T, Beneš J, Fric Z, Konvička M (2003) Dispersal patterns of endemic alpine butterflies with contrasting population structures: Erebia epiphron and E. sudetica. Population Ecology 45: 115-123. doi: 10.1007/s10144-003-0144-x
Lafranchis T, Heaulmé V, Lafranchis J (2001) Biologie, écologie et répartition du Cuivré des marais (Lycaena dispar Haworth, 1803) en Quercy (sud-ouest de la France) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Linneana belgica 18: 27-36.
Lai BG, Pullin AS (2004) Phylogeography, genetic diversity and conservation of the large copper butterfly Lycaena dispar in Europe. Journal of Insect Conservation 8: 27-35. doi: 10.1023/B:JICO.0000027478.35309.46
Leigheb G, Cameron-Curry V, Riboni E, Cecchin S (1998) Present knowledge on the distribution of Erebia christi (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) in the Italian Alps. Nota lepidopterologica 21: 290-295.
Lepidopterologen-Arbeitsgruppe (1987) Tagfalter und ihre Lebensräume: Arten, Gefährdung, Schutz. Schweizerischer Bund für Naturschutz, Basel, 516 pp.
Levente A (2005) Biomonitoring along Drava in Hungary, 2000–2004. Natura Somogyensis 7: 63-73.
Lhonoré PJ (1997) L’ amènagement d’ habitats pour une gestion durable des populations des papillons du genre Maculinea (M. alcon, M. teleius, M. nausithous) (Lepidopt., Lycaenidae). Council of Europe Environmental Encounters Series 33, 109–119.
Lhonoré J, Lagarde M (1999) Biogeography, ecology and conservation of Coenonympha oedippus (Fab., 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 35: 299-307.
Liu WH, Wang YF, Xu RM (2006) Habitat utilization by ovipositing females and larvae of the Marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in a mosaic of meadows and croplands. Journal of Insect Conservation 10: 351-360. doi: 10.1007/s10841-006-9009-x
Loritz H, Settele J (2006) Eiablageverhalten des Großen Feuerfalters (Lycaena dispar) in SW-Deutschland – Wirtspflanzenwahl, Generationenvergleich und Hinweise zur Erfassung. In: Fartmann, T & G. Hermann (Ed.): Larvalökologie von Tagfaltern und Widderchen in Mitteleuropa. Abhandlungen des Westfälischen Museums für Naturk 68: 243-255.
Lorković Z (1993) Ecological association of Leptidea morsei major Grund 1905 (Lepidoptera, Pieridae) with the oak forest Lathyreto-quercetum petraeae HR-T 1957 in Croatia. Periodicum Biologorum 95: 455-457.
Luoto M, Kuussaari M, Rita H, Salminen J, von Bonsdorff T (2001) Determinants of distribution and abundance in the clouded apollo butterfly: a landscape ecological approach. Ecography 24: 601-617.
Manil L, Diringer Y (2003) Excursion entomologique en Corse (juin 2003) : note sur les conséquences des incendies sur une population de Papilio hospiton. Bulletin des Lépidoptéristes Parisiens 12: 42-45.
Martín Cano J, García-Barros E, Munguira ML (2009) Lycaena helle (Dennis y Schiffermüller, 1775). In: Verdú JR, Galante E (Eds). Atlas de los Invertebrados Amenazados de España (Especies En Peligro Crítico y En Peligro). Dirección General para la Biodiversidad, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid: 180-184.
Martin LA, Pullin AS (2004a) Host-plant specialisation and habitat restriction in an endangered insect, Lycaena dispar batavus I. Larval feeding and oviposition preferences. European Journal of Entomology 101: 51-56.
Martin LA, Pullin AS (2004b) Host-plant specialisation and habitat restriction in an endangered insect, Lycaena dispar batavus II. Larval survival on alternative host plants in the field. European Journal of Entomology 101: 57-62.
Meglecz E, Nève G, Pecsenye K, Varga Z (1999) Genetic variations in space and time in Parnassius mnemosyne (L.) (Lepidoptera) populations in north-east Hungary: implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 89: 251-259.
Meyer M (1981) Révision systématique, chorologique et écologique des populations européennes de Lycaena (Helleia) helle [Denis; Schiffermüller, 1775]; (Lepidoptera: Lyceanidae). Linneana belgica 8: 238-260.
Meyer M, Helminger T (1994) Studies of a population of Lycaena helle arduinnae Meyer, 1980 in the northwestern Oesling region (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Bulletin de la Société des Naturalistes Luxembourgeois 95: 315-326.
Mortera H, García-Barros E, Romo H, Munguira ML, Martín Cano J, Lamata F (2011) Lopinga achine (Scopoli, 1763). In: Verdú JR, Numa C, Galante E (Eds). Atlas y Libro Rojo de los Invertebrados amenazados de España (Especies Vulnerables). Dirección General de Medio Natural y Política Forestal, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid: 478-483.
Mouquet N, Thomas JA, Elmes GW, Clarke RT, Hochberg ME (2005) Population dynamics and conservation of a specialized predator: A case study of Maculinea arion. Ecological Monographs 75: 525-542.
Munguira ML (1989) Biología y biogeografía de los Licénidos Ibéricos en peligro de extinción (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Ediciones Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid.
Munguira ML, Martín J (1989) Paralelismo en la biologia de tres especies taxonomicamente proximas y ecologicamente diferenciadas del gen Lysandra: L. dorylas, L. nivescens and L. golgus (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Ecología 3: 331-352.
Munguira ML, Martín J (1993a) The Conservation of Endangered Lycaenid Butterflies in Spain. Biological Conservation 66: 17-22.
Munguira ML, Martín J (1993b) The Sierra Nevada Blue, Polyommatus golgus (Hübner). In: New TR (Ed). Conservation biology of Lycaenidae (Butterflies). IUCN, Gland: 92-94.
Munguira ML, Martín J (Eds) (1999) Action plan for Maculinea butterflies in Europe. Nature and environment. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 63 pp.
Munguira ML, Martín J, García-Barros E, Viejo JL (1997) Use of space and resources in a Mediterranean population of the butterfly Euphydryas aurinia. Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology 18: 597-612.
Munguira ML, Martín J, García-Barros E (2000) Plebicula golgus (Hübner, 1813). In: Galante E, Verdú JR (Eds). Los artrópodos de la “Directiva Hábitat” en España. Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid: 72-75.
Nakonieczny M, Kedziorski A, Michalczyk K (2007) Apollo butterfly (Parnassius apollo L.) in Europe: its history, decline and perspectives of conservation. Functional Ecosystems and Communities 1: 56-79.
Nardelli U, Benedetto G (1994) Melanargia pherusa Boisduval 1833: Biologie, Ökologie, Morphologie und Verbreitung im Vergleich mit Melanargia arge Sulzer 1776 (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Satyrinae). Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, Neue Folge 15: 87-108.
Nicholls CN, Pullin AS (2000) A comparison of larval survivorship in wild and introduced populations of the large copper butterfly (Lycaena dispar batavus). Biological Conservation 93: 349-358. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00134-2
Nicholls CN, Pullin AS (2003) The effects of flooding on survivorship in overwintering larvae of the large copper butterfly Lycaena dispar batavus, and its possible implications for restoration managment. European Journal of Entomology 100: 65-72.
Novak J, Skalicky M, Hakl J, Dvorakova E (2007) Habitat management for the protected Maculinea butterflies: The effect of mowing. Cereal Research Communications 35: 857-860. doi: 10.1556/Crc.35.2007.2.173
Nowicki P, Witek M, Skorka P, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2005) Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous and the implications for conservation. Population Ecology 47: 193-202. doi: 10.1007/s10144-005-0222-3
Nowicki P, Pepkowska A, Kudlek J, Skorka P, Witek M, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2007) From metapopulation theory to conservation recommendations: Lessons from spatial occurrence and abundance patterns of Maculinea butterflies. Biological Conservation 140: 119-129. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.001
Ortner A, Lechner K (2007) Zur Situation des Wald-Wiesenvögelchens Coenonympha hero (Linnaeus, 1761) in Österreich (Lepidoptera, Satyrinae). Beiträge zur Entomofaunistik 8: 101-108
Örvössy N, Kőrösi A, Vozár A, Batáry P, Peregovits L (2005) Microhabitat preference of the Southern Festoon (Zerynthia polyxena). In: Kühn E, Feldmann R, Thomas JA, Settele J (Eds) Studies on the ecology and conservation of butterflies in Europe Vol 1: General concepts and case studies. Pensoft, Sofia.
Örvössy N, Vozar A, Kőrösi A, Batáry P, Peregovits L (2010) Structure and size of a threatened population of the False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Hungary. Oedippus 26: 31-37.
Paracchini ML, Petersen JE, Hoogeveen Y, Bamps C, Burfield I, van Swaay CAM (2008) High nature value farmland in Europe: an estimate of the distribution patterns on the basis of land cover and biodiversity data. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 87 pp.
Patricelli D, Barbero F, La Morgia V, Casacci LP, Witek M, Balletto E, Bonelli S (2011) To lay or not to lay: oviposition of Maculinea arion in relation to Myrmica ant presence and host plant phenology. Animal Behaviour 82: 791-799. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.07.011
Popović M, Đurić M (2010) New findings of two rare nymphalids in Serbia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, Neue Folge 31: 169-172.
Porter K, Ellis S (2011) Securing viable metapopulations of the Marsh Fritillary butterfly, Euphydryas aurinia, (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Northern England. Journal of Insect Conservation 15: 111-119. doi: 10.1007/s10841-010-9328-9
Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Bommarco R, Felicioli A, Fischer M, Jokinen P, Kleijn D, Klein AM, Kunin WE, Neumann P, Penev LD, Petanidou T, Rasmont P, Roberts SPM, Smith HG, Sørensen PB, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vaissière BE, Vilà M, Vujić A, Woyciechowski M, Zobel M, Settele J, Schweiger O (2011) Developing European conservation and mitigation tools for pollination services: approaches of the STEP (Status and Trends of European Pollinators) project. Journal of Apicultural Research 50: 152-164. doi: 10.3896/Ibra.1.50.2.07
Pretscher P (2001) Verbreitung und Art-Steckbrief des Wald-Wiesenvögelchens (Coenonympha hero Linnaeus, 1761) in Deutschland. Natur und Landschaft 76: 547-552.
Pullin AS (1997) Habitat requirements of Lycaena dispar batavus and implications for re-establishment in England. Journal of Insect Conservation 1: 177-185. doi: 10.1023/A:1018407831717
Pullin AS, Bálint Z, Balletto E, Jaroslav B, Coutsis JG, Goffart P, Kulfan M, Lhonoré JE, Settele J, Van der Made JG (1998) The status, ecology and conservation of Lycaena dispar (Lycaenidae: Lycaenini) in Europe. Nota lepidopterologica 21: 94-100.
Rakosy L, Jutzeler D (2005) Biologie, Ökologie und Verbreitung des Karawanken-Mohrenfalters Erebia calcaria (Lorkovic, 1949) in Kärnten. Carinthia II 115: 675-690.
Rakosy L, Tartally A, Goia M, Mihali C, Varga Z (2010) The Dusky Large Blue Maculinea nausithous kijevensis (Sheljuzhko, 1928) in the Transylvanian basin: New data on taxonomy and ecology. Nota lepidopterologica 33: 31-37.
Rakosy L, Pecsenye K, Mihali C, Tóth A, Varga Z (in press) Taxonomic review of Euphydryas (Hypodryas) maturna (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) with description of a new subspecies from Dobrogea (Romania) and notes on conservation biology. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 57.
Rambring H (1969) Hojnordisk graessommerfugl (Erebia medusa Schiff. polaris Stdgr.). Lepidoptera (ny serie) 1: 152-154.
Russo L (1991) Morphologie et biologie des premiers états de Melanargia arge Sulzer (Lepidoptera Nymphalidae, Satyrinae). Alexanor 17: 100-102.
Russo L (1994) Variabilité chromatique chez la chenille de Melanargia arge Sulzer (Lepidoptera Nymphalidae, Satyrinae). Alexanor 18: 387-388.
Saarinen K, Jantunen J, Valtonen A (2005) Resumed forest grazing restored a population of Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera : Nymphalidae) in SE Finland. European Journal of Entomology 102: 683-690.
Šašic M (2010) False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Croatia: current status, population dynamics and conservation management. Oedippus 26: 16-19.
Schtickzelle N, Choutt J, Goffart P, Fichefet V, Baguette M (2005) Metapopulation dynamics and conservation of the marsh fritillary butterfly: Population viability analysis and management options for a critically endangered species in Western Europe. Biological Conservation 126: 569-581. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.06.030
Seidler F (2007) Der Gelbringfalter Lopinga achine (Scopoli, 1763) am Unteren Lech. Berichte des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins für Schwaben 111: 78-87.
Settele J, Kühn E (2009) Insect conservation. Science 325: 41-42. doi: 10.1126/science.1176892
Settele J, Hammen V, Hulme P, Karlson U, Klotz S, Kotarac M, Kunin W, Marion G, O’Connor M, Petanidou T, Peterson K, Potts S, Pritchard H, Pysek P, Rounsevell M, Spangenberg J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Sykes M, Vighi M, Zobel M, Kuhn I (2005a) ALARM: Assessing LArge-scale environmental Risks for biodiversity with tested Methods. Gaia-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 14: 69-72.
Settele J, Kühn E, Thomas JA (2005b)Studies on the Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe, Vol. 2: Species Ecology along a European Gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a Model. Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow, 289 pp.
Settele J, Kudrna O, Harpke A, Kühn I, Van Swaay C, Verovnik R, Warren M, Wiemers M, Hanspach J, Hickler T, Kühn E, van Halder I, Veling K, Vliegenthart A, Wynhoff I, Schweiger O (2008) Climatic Risk Atlas of European Butterflies. BIORISK – Biodiversity and Ecosystem Risk Assessment 1: 1-710. doi: 10.3897/biorisk.1
Settele J, Shreeve TG, Konvička M, van Dyck H (Eds) (2009) Ecology of butterflies in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, xii + 513 pp.
Sielezniew M, Palka K, Michalczuk W, Bystrowski C, Holowinski M, Czerwinski M (2010) False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (Fabricius, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Poland: state of knowledge and conservation prospects. Oedippus 26: 20-24.
Slamka F (1989) Apatura ilia (Denis Et Schiffermuller, 1775) and Apatura ilia metis (Freyer, 1829) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Biologia 44: 601-604.
Smee M, Smyth W, Tunmore M, Ffrench-Constant R, Hodgson D (2011) Butterflies on the brink: habitat requirements for declining populations of the marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in SW England. Journal of Insect Conservation 15: 153-163. doi: 10.1007/s10841-010-9334-y
Spitzer L, Beneš J, Dandova J, Jaskova V, Konvička M (2009) The Large Blue butterfly, Phengaris [Maculinea] arion, as a conservation umbrella on a landscape scale: The case of the Czech Carpathians. Ecological Indicators 9: 1056-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.12.006
Stefanescu C, Penuelas J, Sardans J, Fillela I (2006) Females of the specialist butterfly Euphydrias aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalinae: Melitaeini) select the greenest leaves of Lonicera implexa (Caprifoliaceae) for oviposition. European Journal of Entomology 103: 569-574.
Steiner R, Hermann G (1999) Freilandbeobachtungen zu Eiablageverhalten und -habitat des Wald-Wiesenvögelchens, Coenonympha hero (Linnaeus, 1761), an einer Flugstelle in Baden-Württemberg. Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, Neue Folge 20: 111-118.
Steiner R, Trautner J, Grandchamp A-C (2006) Larvalhabitate des Blauschillernden Feuerfalters (Lycaena helle) am schweizerischen Alpennordrand unter Berücksichtigung des Einflusses von Beweidung. In: Fartmann T, Hermann G (Eds). Larvalökologie von Tagfaltern und Widderchen in Mitteleuropa. Westfälisches Museum für Naturkunde, Münster: 135-151.
Stettmer C, Binzenhöfer B, Gros P, Hartmann P (2001a) Habitatmanagement und Schutzmaßnahmen für die Ameisenbläulinge Glaucopsyche teleius und Glaucopsyche nausithous. Teil 1: Populationsdynamik, Ausbreitungsverhalten und Biotopverbund. Natur und Landschaft 76: 278-287.
Stettmer C, Binzenhöfer B, Gros P, Hartmann P (2001b) Habitatmanagement und Schutzmaßnahmen für die Ameisenbläulinge Glaucopsyche teleius und Glaucopsyche nausithous. Teil 2: Habitatansprüche, Gefährdung und Pflege. Natur und Landschaft 76: 366-376.
Stettmer C, Bräu M, Binzenhöfer B, Reiser B, Settele J (2008) Pflegeempfehlungen für das Management der Ameisenbläulinge Maculinea teleius, Maculinea nausithous und Maculinea alcon. Ein Wegweiser für die Naturschutzpraxis. Natur und Landschaft 83: 480-487.
Strausz M, Fiedler K, Franzén M, Wiemers M (in press) Habitat and host plant use of the Large Copper Butterfly Lycaena dispar in an urban environment. Journal of Insect Conservation. doi: 10.1007/s10841-012-9456-5
Tartally A, Rakosy L, Vizauer TC, Goia M, Varga Z (2008) Maculinea nausithous exploits Myrmica scabrinodis in Transylvania: Unusual host ant species of myrmecophilous butterfly in an isolated region (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae; Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 51: 373-380.
Thomas JA (1984) The Behavior and Habitat Requirements of Maculinea nausithous (the Dusky Large Blue Butterfly) and Maculinea teleius (the Scarce Large Blue) in France. Biological Conservation 28: 325-347.
Thomas JA, Simcox DJ (2005) Contrasting management requirements of Maculinea arion across latitudinal and altitudinal climatic gradients in west Europe. In: Settele J, Kühn E, Thomas JA (Eds). Studies on the Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe, Vol. 2: Species Ecology along a European Gradient: Maculinea butterflies as a Model. Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow: 240-244.
Thomas JA, Simcox DJ, Clarke RT (2009) Successful Conservation of a Threatened Maculinea Butterfly. Science 325: 80-83. doi: 10.1126/science.1175726
Thust R, Thiele A, Gohl K (2001) Das Wald-Wiesenvögelchen (Coenonympha hero Linnaeus, 1761; Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Thüringen – ein Nachruf und ein Lehrstück. Natur und Landschaft 76: 542-546.
Timus N, Voda R, Paulini I, Crisan A, Popa R, Rakosy L (2011) Managementul pajistilor mezohigrofile de pe Dealurile Clujului Est (Transilvania) pentru protectia si conservarea specie Maculinea teleius (Bergsträsser, 1779) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Meso-hygrophilous grassland management for the conservation of Maculinea teleius (Bergsträsser, 1779) – in the Eastern Hils of Cluj (Transylvania) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). In: Brudea V, Duduman ML, Rakosy L (Eds) Biodiversitatea si managementul insectelor din România, Suceava, 24–25 Septembrie 2010, 29–45.
Todisco V, Gratton P, Cesaroni D, Sbordoni V (2010) Phylogeography of Parnassius apollo: hints on taxonomy and conservation of a vulnerable glacial butterfly invader. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 101: 169-183.
Tolman T (1992) On the life-history of Pseudophilotes bavius (Eversmann, 1832) in S. Greece, its distribution in the Peloponnesos and a new record for N. Greece (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Phegea 20: 35-39.
Väisänen R, Soumalainen E, Luoma H (1983) The occurence and protection of Lycaena dispar (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) in Finland. Notulae Entomologicae 63: 124-126.
Välimäki P, Itämies J (2003) Migration of the clouded Apollo butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne in a network of suitable habitats - effects of patch characteristics. Ecography 26: 679-691
Välimäki P, Männistö K, Kaitila J-P (2011) Katsaus Enontekiön uhanalaisiin tunturiperhoslajeihin ja tunturiperhosseurannan esiintymisaluehavaintoihin vuosina 2008–2011. [Threatened butterflies and moths in high fjelds of Le Enontekiö with special reference to observations during monitoring scheme of subarctic Lepidoptera 2008–2011]. Baptria 36: 70-90.
van Helsdingen PJ, Willemse L, Speight MCD (1998) Background information on invertebrates of the Habitats Directive and the Bern Convention. Part I - Crustacea, Coleoptera and Lepidoptera. Nature and Environment no 79. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, 217 pp.
van Swaay CAM (2002) The importance of calcareous grasslands for butterflies in Europe. Biological Conservation 104: 315-318.
van Swaay CAM, Warren MS (2006) Prime Butterfly Areas of Europe: an initial selection of priority sites for conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation 10: 5-11. doi: 10.1007/s10841-005-7548-1
van Swaay C, Warren M, Lois G (2006) Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. Journal of Insect Conservation 10: 305-306. doi: 10.1007/s10841-006-8361-1
van Swaay CAM, Maes D, Warren MS (2009) Conservation status of European butterflies. In: Settele J, Shreeve T, Konvicka M, Van Dyck H (Eds). Ecology of Butterflies in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 322-338.
van Swaay C, Cuttelod A, Collins S, Maes D, López Munguira ML, Šašić M, Settele J, Verovnik R, Verstrael T, Warren M, Wiemers M, Wynhoff I (2010) European Red List of Butterflies. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 47 pp.
van Swaay C, Maes D, Collins S, Munguira ML, Šašic M, Settele J, Verovnik R, Warren M, Wiemers M, Wynhoff I, Cuttelod A (2011) Applying IUCN criteria to invertebrates: How red is the Red List of European butterflies? Biological Conservation 144: 470–478. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.034
Wahlberg N (1998) The life history and ecology of Euphydryas maturna (Nymphalidae: Melitaeini) in Finland. Nota lepidopterologica 21: 154-169.
Wahlberg N (2001) On the status of the scarce fritillary Euphydryas maturna (Lepidoptera : Nymphalidae) in Finland. Entomologica Fennica 12: 244-250.
Wang RJ, Wang YF, Chen JJ, Lei GC, Xu RM (2004) Contrasting movement patterns in two species of chequerspot butterflies, Euphydryas aurinia and Melitaea phoebe, in the same patch network. Ecological Entomology 29: 367-374.
Warren MS (1994) The Uk Status and Suspected Metapopulation Structure of a Threatened European Butterfly, the Marsh Fritillary Eurodryas aurinia. Biological Conservation 67: 239-249
Warren MS, Munguira ML, Ferrin J (1994) Notes on the distribution, habitats and conservation of Eurodryas aurinia (Rottemburg) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Spain. Entomologist’s Gazette 45: 5-12.
Webb MR, Pullin AS (1996) Larval survival in populations of the large copper butterfly Lycaena dispar batavus. Ecography 19: 276-286. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1996.tb00237.x
Webb MR, Pullin AS (2000) Egg distribution in the large copper butterfly Lycaena dispar batavus: Host plant versus habitat mediated effects. European Journal of Entomology 97: 363-367.
Weidemann HJ (1982a) Bemerkungen zu Lebensraum und Lebensweise des “Donauschillerfalters” Apatura metis und seiner Präimaginalstadien (Lep.: Nymphalidae), 2. Butterfly, ethology, geograhic distribution, population density, Europe. Entomologische Zeitschrift 92: 265-274.
Weidemann HJ (1982b) Bemerkungen zu Lebensraum und Lebensweise des “Donauschillerfalters” Apatura metis und seiner Praimaginalstadien (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), 4. Taxonomic morphology (concluded). Entomologische Zeitschrift 92: 297-309.
Wermeille E, Sonderegger P, Carron G (2007) Aktionsplan Nr. 14 - Sudeten-Mohrenfalter (Erebia sudetica). Swiss Butterfly Conservation, 53 pp.
Werner F, Möller J (2003) Der Große Feuerfalter (Lycaena dispar) im Nationalpark Unteres Odertal – Untersuchungen zur Habitateignung von ausgewählten Probeflächen. Beiträge zur Forstwirtschaft und Landschaftsökologie 37: 40-43.
Wiemers M (2007) Die Gattung Coenonympha Hübner, 1819, in Europa: Systematik, Ökologie und Schutz. Oedippus 25: 1-42.
Wiemers M, Stradomsky BV, Vodolazhsky DI (2010) A molecular phylogeny of Polyommatus s. str. and Plebicula based on mitochondrial COI and nuclear ITS2 sequences (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). European Journal of Entomology 107: 325-336.
Witek M, Sliwinska EB, Skorka P, Nowicki P, Wantuch M, Vrabec V, Settele J, Woyciechowski M (2008) Host ant specificity of large blue butterflies Phengaris (Maculinea) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) inhabiting humid grasslands in East-central Europe. European Journal of Entomology 105: 871-877.
Witek M, Nowicki P, Śliwinska EB, Skórka P, Settele J, Schonrogge K, Woyciechowski M (2010) Local host ant specificity of Phengaris (Maculinea) teleius butterfly, an obligatory social parasite of Myrmica ants. Ecological Entomology 35: 557-564. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01213.x
Witkowski Z, Adamski P, Kosior A, Plonka P (1997) Extinction and reintroduction of Parnassius apollo in the Pieniny National Park (Polish Carpathians). Biologia 52: 199-208.
Wynhoff I (1998) The recent distribution of the European Maculinea species. Journal of Insect Conservation 2: 15-27.
Wynhoff I (2001) At home on foreign meadows: the reintroduction of two Maculinea butterfly species. Wageningen: Wageningen University, 236 pp.
Wynhoff I, Grutters M, van Langevelde F (2008) Looking for the ants: selection of oviposition sites by two myrmecophilous butterfly species. Animal Biology 58: 371-388. doi: 10.1163/157075608x383683
Wynhoff I, van Gestel R, van Swaay C, van Langevelde F (2011) Not only the butterflies: managing ants on road verges to benefit Phengaris (Maculinea) butterflies. Journal of Insect Conservation 15: 189-206. doi: 10.1007/s10841-010-9337-8
Zimmermann K, Blazkova P, Cizek O, Fric Z, Hula V, Kepka P, Novotny D, Slamova I, Konvička M (2011a) Demography of adults of the Marsh fritillary butterfly, Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in the Czech Republic: Patterns across sites and seasons. European Journal of Entomology 108: 243-254.
Zimmermann K, Fric Z, Jiskra P, Kopeckova M, Vlasanek P, Zapletal M, Konvička M (2011b) Mark-recapture on large spatial scale reveals long distance dispersal in the Marsh Fritillary, Euphydryas aurinia. Ecological Entomology 36: 499-510. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2011.01293.x