Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Matthew D. Moran ( moran@hendrix.edu ) Academic editor: João Pompeu
© 2025 Lindsay Stallcup, Matthew D. Moran, Doris Rojas, Erich Mata.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Stallcup L, Moran MD, Rojas D, Mata E (2025) Establishing priorities for future land conservation to maximise biodiversity conservation and other ecosystem services in the Tilarán Mountains of Costa Rica. Nature Conservation 58: 243-260. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.58.142210
|
The Monteverde-Arenal Bioregion (MAB), located in the Tilarán Mountains of north-central Costa Rica, contains some of the most biodiverse habitats in Costa Rica and also provides the backbone for some of Costa Rica’s most important ecotourism destinations. Several national parks and private preserves protect a large area of habitat in the region, but this complex of protected areas is isolated from other large protected areas because of deforestation associated mostly with agricultural development, plus a smaller amount of urban development. Furthermore, we are aware of no detailed analysis to identify landscapes in need of protection in order to secure the conservation of the region’s biodiversity into the future. Using GIS technology, we analysed select conservation-related ecosystem services in order to identify the lands of highest future conservation priority outside of existing protected areas in the MAB. We identified large areas of habitat on the Pacific slope to the south and west of the existing protected areas and habitat adjacent to Lake Arenal to the northwest of existing protected areas as having the highest ecosystem services values. In contrast, most lands on the Caribbean slope outside of the existing protected areas had comparatively lower ecosystem services values. Based on this analysis, we recommend that future conservation efforts, including potential land purchase, should focus on conserving mid-elevation Pacific slope forests and land along previously proposed biological sub-corridors that could connect the MAB to other existing protected areas. Our analysis shows that many important landscapes for biodiversity conservation in and near the MAB currently exist outside of protected areas, making many species found in those areas vulnerable to human activities. The opportunity to connect currently protected areas to one another through effective biological corridors still remains, possibly through conservation partnerships with landowners or direct land purchase, but time could be short as increasing development and changing land-use patterns threaten to further isolate habitats in the MAB.
Biological corridors, Costa Rica, GIS, land-use, Mesoamerica, Tilarán Mountains, tropical forest
The Monteverde-Arenal Bioregion (MAB), located in the Tilarán Mountains of Costa Rica, has some of the highest biodiversity in Central America and simultaneously represents one of the most important ecotourism destinations of the country (
Study area showing boundaries of analysis (red outline), protected areas with ownership designation and proposed biological sub-corridors (in yellow outline)
The region is noted for its high biodiversity, especially for plants, amphibians and birds (
The area also is a prime location for ecotourism, with Monteverde and La Fortuna (as well as smaller nearby communities) hosting hundreds of thousands of national and international visitors annually (
While conservation efforts in the Monteverde-Arenal Bioregion have been successful, most of the land that has been protected to date is at higher elevations and/or includes steep terrain and is not well suited for traditional land use, such as agriculture. Lower elevations in the region remain mostly unprotected, resulting in an island of conservation in a larger sea of partial deforestation and development (
The MAB is also part of the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor, one of the most diverse ecoregions of the world, representing one of the identified hotspots of biodiversity on Earth. This large corridor connects the distant bioregions of the North and South American continents and is, therefore, of outstanding importance for both animals that need large ranges (e.g. Panthera onca) and species that migrate seasonally across the region (e.g. migratory Neotropical birds). Therefore, successful land conservation in this region will further the goals of larger Mesoamerican biodiversity protection (
In this study, we analysed select ecosystem services for landscapes in and around the Monteverde-Arenal Bioregion through the use of geographic information systems (GIS). Our goal was to identify priority lands for future conservation efforts, including direct purchase as well as other conservation initiatives. We hoped that we could identify areas that would be best utilised for conservation, while simultaneously identifying lands that are better left to remain in traditional economic activities, such as agriculture, businesses and other human infrastructure. We also sought to identify suitable potential biological corridors that could connect the MAB to nearby protected areas, as such corridors would represent high priority land for conservation for their ability to reduce regional fragmentation.
We studied the area in and around the MAB, located in the Tilarán mountain range of north-central Costa Rica, one of most important protected areas in Central America (
Photographs of landscapes within the study area A Peñas Blancas Valley on the Caribbean slope of the MAB area B San Luis Valley on the Pacific slope of the MAB; much of this area is secondary forest that has regenerated in the last three decades C fragmented habitats lower on the Pacific slope showing heavy deforestation and fragmentation due to agricultural activity D partially forested, but largely unprotected corridor (about 2/3rds native forest) between the MAB (Arenal Volcano National Park visible on far right of photo) and Tenorio National Park protected lands.
We chose to analyse the landscapes adjacent to protected areas within the MAB, plus areas around the two biological sub-corridors proposed in
While there are numerous ecosystem services for all landscapes (
List of selected ecosystem services measured in this study with short descriptions of their value to conservation.
| Ecosystem Service | Benefits | Method of Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| biological corridors | migration/dispersal of species, genetic connectivity, reduced mortality | arbitrary assignment of value (0, 1 or 2) |
| protection of land with steep slopes | reduced soil erosion, reduced landslide risk, water quality | assignment of value based on slope angle |
| land-use/forest cover | carbon sequestration, ecotourism, biodiversity protection, local climate and air quality | assignment of value based on forest, pasture or urban development |
| life zones | biodiversity | assignment of value based on zone-specific biodiversity, rarity and level of protection |
| biodiversity | genetic wealth, ecotourism, ecosystem | assignment of value based on endemism and overall species diversity |
| hydroelectric generation | clean electricity, economic well-being | assignment of value based on watershed-specific power generation |
For each ES, we ranked individual locations with a score of 0, 1 or 2, with zero being the lowest priority and 2 being the highest priority (see individual descriptions, below). We recognise that there is a certain level of arbitrariness to this decision; for the quantitative measures, we generally divided the values into 33.3% percentiles. While we have considered these ecosystem services separately, we recognise that some of these ecosystem services interact in complex ways (e.g. steep slopes have both high erosion potential and high hydroelectric generation potential). Conserving the ecosystem services which we studied in this project is also likely to enhance additional services for which we lack data.
We considered the following areas, which would reduce regional habitat fragmentation, to be high priority landscapes for conservation: existing biological corridors as defined by Costa Rica’s National System of Conservation Areas (Sistema Nacional de Areas de Conservación, SINAC); forested land that would connect existing protected areas in the MAB to nearby protected areas; and private inholdings completely surrounded by existing protected areas. We assigned high conservation priority to the two sub-corridors proposed in
We used slope as a proxy for the ecosystem service of soil conservation and erosion prevention. Landslides are also costly to infrastructure and hazards to human life, so preserving forest cover on steeply-sloped land has numerous societal benefits (
We defined three basic categories of land use: forest, pasture and developed/intensive agriculture (i.e. urban, suburban, other human structures and permanent crops), based on the GIS data available for the study area. Available databases do not differentiate between native forest (defined as both primary and secondary forest) and plantation forests; however, the vast majority of forests in the study area are naturally occurring (
We assessed the value of each Holdridge life zone (
Life Zone Priority = (Alz / At) * (Ap / Alz)
where: Alz = area (hectares) of life zone in the study area, At = total study area (hectares) and Ap = area (hectares) of life zone officially protected within the study area.
This formula produced an inverse relationship: lower scores indicate rare and poorly-protected life zones that should be given higher conservation priority, while high scores indicate life zones that are already well-represented within existing protected areas in the study area and, therefore, are of lower conservation priority. Life zones with a score of 0 (i.e. 0% protected) were assigned a value of 2; life zones with a score of 0.01 to 0.05 were assigned a value of 1; and life zones with a score of 0.05 or greater were assigned a value of 0.
We assigned a numerical value to biodiversity based on two variables, number of endemic species and species richness, of selected groups for which there is reliable country-wide data as calculated by
The number of species + the number of endemics was summed and these values divided into 33.3% percentiles, then assigned values on the 0–2 scale used in the other ecosystem services measured. One Holdridge Life Zone lacked biodiversity data (Bosque Pluvial Montano Bajo), so it should be noted that this life zone had a lower potential total conservation value in the final calculation as compared to the others.
Costa Rica has a largely carbon-free electricity grid (
The values from the six ES categories were totalled to produce a total priority score, with a minimum – maximum range from 0 to 12. These values were then plotted on to a “heat map” of the study area to show land with the highest combined ranking of ecosystem services and that should, therefore, be considered of highest conservation value for future conservation action.
The MAB has large altitudinal gradients over a relatively small geographical area, resulting in many steeply-sloped lands (Figs
Land use in the study area is highly correlated with land already under some measure of conservation or protection. Unsurprisingly, protected areas are almost entirely covered in tropical forest (of various life zones), which is the natural land cover of the entire region (Fig.
The study area spans 11 Holdridge life zones. Most of the protected areas of the MAB fall within the lower montane rainforest and premontane rainforest life zones, with smaller areas of tropical wet forest transition to premontane (Fig.
There are six major hydroelectric projects within the study area: one on the Pacific slope and five on the Caribbean slope (Fig.
When we combine all of the selected ecosystem services, the areas that should be given highest priority for conservation are generally located in two distinct locations: land on the Pacific slope to the south and west of the existing protected areas and land connecting Arenal National Park with the Tenorio Complex to the northwest of Lake Arenal (Fig.
Our analysis confirms the existence of unprotected lands with high conservation value in the vicinity of the existing protected areas of the MAB that should be the target of conservation activities. There are also areas that have comparatively less conservation value, showing that these types of analyses can help to prioritise the limited resources available for conservation. At this point in time, differentiating land more suitable for traditional economic activity from land that would be better utilised for protection of natural resources will be critical as societies try to balance economic needs with environmental and ecosystem services protection. This balance is even more critical for countries like Costa Rica, whose strong tourism (and especially ecotourism) sector outweighs benefits from extractive activities and depends on a healthy natural environment to sustain its economic well-being.
The first area which we identified as high priority for conservation includes lower elevations on the Pacific slope to the south and west of the existing protected areas in the MAB. This region has a high number of closely altitudinally-spaced life zones, several of which have high species diversity and endemism. The life zones in this area are also poorly protected in the study area (and in Costa Rica in general). As the climate in these life zones tends to be favourable for cattle ranching and coffee growing, much of this habitat was deforested many years ago for agricultural use. However, some forested areas remain, especially on steep slopes and in riparian zones. Additionally, these areas have experienced an increase in reforestation over the past few decades as the more marginal agricultural areas have been abandoned and allowed to regenerate (
The second priority area for future conservation efforts lies between Arenal National Park and the Tenorio Complex, to the northeast east of Lake Arenal. There are actually two potential corridors here: one along the sub-corridor proposed in
The establishment of biological sub-corridors that extend outwards from the existing protected areas of the MAB would conceivably be positive in supporting populations of animals that need large areas for viable populations (
A third potential area of focus, extending from the MAB to Juan Castro Blanco National Park, is more problematic. While the western part of the proposed sub-corridor has abundant forested lands of high conservation value (Fig.
The entire region falls within the Mesoamerican Corridor proposal (
This analysis shows that conservation efforts in the MAB have been successful in creating a large complex of biodiverse protected areas. Yet these areas remain an island of protected lands isolated from larger regional protected areas and several life zones remain completely unprotected. However, land of high conservation value and low traditional economic value remains that, if placed under conservation, could mitigate these two issues. Considering the incredibly high contribution of this area to Costa Rica’s total biodiversity and the large ecotourism economy dependent upon this biodiversity, we urge conservation organisations to consider how to achieve expanded, but selective land conservation of the MAB, possibly through a combination of direct land purchase, ecotourism development in these areas and cooperative agreements between landowners and conservation organisations. Examples of direct land purchase priorities might include some of the highest conservation priority areas of the Bellbird Biological Corridor directly adjacent to protected areas and/or the smaller unforested areas of the Tenorio Corridor that would, if reforested, connect larger areas of forest together. However, since direct purchase of all high conservation priority lands is financially and logistically difficult, we expect that cooperative work with private landowners will be the primary way to achieve greater success in preserving the rich biodiversity of this region.
We wish to thank the Alex C. Walker Foundation for their generous funding for this project. Peter Gausmann and João Pompeu provided valuable feedback that improved this manuscript.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
This work was supported by Alex C. Walker Foundation.
Conceptualization: LS, MDM. Data curation: EM, DR. Formal analysis: EM, MDM, DR, LS. Funding acquisition: MDM, LS. Investigation: LS. Methodology: LS, MDM. Project administration: LS. Software: EM, DR. Supervision: LS. Writing - original draft: MDM. Writing - review and editing: LS, EM, MDM, DR.
Matthew D. Moran https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8611-6092
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.