Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: José Armando Huepa Briñez ( jhuepa11@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Robert Philipp Wagensommer
© 2025 José Armando Huepa Briñez, Gloria Yaneth Florez-Yepes.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Huepa Briñez JA, Florez-Yepes GY (2025) Impact associated with water sources: An environmental analysis. Nature Conservation 58: 311-337. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.58.151037
|
This analysis addresses the main stressors that affect water sources in the Combeima watershed, evaluating human activities such as subsistence mining, deforestation, erosion and the use of pesticides that impact the quality and availability of water resources. In addition, the effects of these threats on aquatic ecosystems and local communities are considered, proposing management and conservation strategies to promote sustainability in sustainable development in the region. Scientific information on the impacts of anthropogenic activities in this basin is limited. The research was divided into two phases: the first, in which the biological, socioeconomic and management systems of the area were analyzed from an ecosystem perspective, and the second, in which the DPSIR methodology was used to identify possible negative impacts on tourists. The main driving forces exerting adverse effects on the Combeima basin are pollution from subsistence mining, river bathing, pesticide use in agriculture, road saturation, souvenir collecting, tourism, urbanization, soil erosion, and deforestation, with a total of 12.9% threats, with high threats of 6.3%, medium threats of 6.3%, and low threats of 0.3%. These results allow government entities to take conservation measures that should include local stakeholderrs in the implementation to maintain the well-being of generations and avoid biodiversity loss in the Combeima basin.
Conservation, deforestation, DPSIR, environmental impact, road saturation, tourism
Since several years, the National Parks Unit of Colombia has promoted ecotourism as a strategy to conserve natural resources in protected areas, considered one of the ecotourism destinations with the most significant interest for travel and nature lovers. Ecotourism, is viewed as a source of sustainability, both for the protected area and for local communities, by generating economic income and employment (
Currently, concepts such as sustainable tourism and ecotourism are often confused and conflated, as the two are closely linked. However, some aspects allow us to differentiate the essence of each. The tourism activity developed in the Wildlife Refuge from the supply side is under the characteristics of ecotourism, while from the perspective of demand it is under the parameters of responsible tourism; therefore, if we consider supply and demand together, then we would be facing a modality of nature tourism under parameters of sustainability (
Sustainable tourism, according to the UNWTO, is defined as tourism designed to improve the lives of local people, provide a higher quality of experience for visitors, maintain the quality of the destination’s environment, achieve higher levels of economic profitability for the local population through tourism activities, and ensure the achievement of profits for local businesses (
Environmental impact involves the adverse effects on ecosystems, climate and society due to activities such as excessive extraction of natural resources, improper waste disposal, emission of pollutants and land use change, among others ((
The impact on resources may vary depending on the characteristics of the site, the prevailing conditions, and the types of activities practiced (
Environmental assessments employ scientific tools to evaluate, predict, or calculate the ecological status of an ecosystem following standardized guidelines (
The Combeima basin, located in a privileged natural environment, is a tourist destination that attracts visitors seeking nature-based experiences and connections. However, the growth of tourism has led to a series of impacts and effects that may compromise both the environment and the quality of life of its local inhabitants (
This research paper evaluates the impacts associated with vital water sources, helping identify and understand the consequences of tourism on the biodiversity, water resources, and cultural heritage of the Combeima basin. Through the DPSIR analysis, some management strategies can be identified that promote sustainable tourism, balancing economic development with environmental conservation and the protection of cultural identity. This evaluation of tourism impacts becomes an essential tool to ensure that the Combeima basin remains a place of natural beauty and wealth, benefiting both tourists and the local communities who inhabit the area.
The study area is the Combeima river basin, which is located in the city of Ibagué, in the Department of Tolima (Colombia), between the coordinates 04°19'30’’–04°39'57"N, 75°10'11’’–75°23'23"W, on the eastern flank of the central mountain range of the Andes in Colombia and is made up of three districts: Cay, Villa Restrepo and Juntas, which is home to more than 25 hamlets, its climate can vary significantly due to its altitude, which ranges between 1400 and 4200 m.a.s.l., with an area of 27,421 ha and a length of 57.7 km, the average annual rainfall is 1816 mm and the average temperature is 17 °C. There are intertwined mountains that house water tributaries with waterfalls, tropical forests, humid forests, Andean forests and even the important paramos. With biophysical conditions and its tourist appropriation, it is configured as a potential area for the development of nature tourism in the city of Ibague and the department of Tolima (Fig.
The five groups of protected areas of the Combeima Canyon are located in the districts of Juntas (3,486.01 ha) and Villa Restrepo (2,300.58 ha), North Hills of Ibague (9,130.5 ha), and the Civil Society Nature Reserve (184.2 ha), for a total of 15,101.29 ha. (Fig.
The DPSIR (Drivers, Pressures, State, Impacts and Responses) model is a management tool that recognizes and examines the origin and consequences of environmental problems and can improve decision-making by stakeholders and government (
The Combeima basin is a vital ecosystem facing significant challenges such as deforestation and mining pollution. To effectively address these problems, it is essential to apply the DPSIR methodology (Drivers, Pressures, State, Impact, and Response), which helps to understand the interactions between human activities and the environment. However, it is crucial to broaden this analysis by placing greater emphasis on private sector responses, alongside government actions, in order to improve long-term sustainability in the region.
Drivers in the Combeima basin include economic, social, and demographic factors that encourage the use of natural resources. Economic growth and demand for agricultural and mineral products are key drivers. Here, the private sector can play a crucial role by adopting more sustainable practices. For example, agricultural companies can implement sustainable farming techniques that reduce pressure on natural resources, while mining companies can explore less invasive alternatives.
Private sector pressures, such as intensive agriculture and mining, significantly influence the environment. These pressures translate into ecosystem degradation, water pollution, and biodiversity loss. Companies can mitigate these pressures by adopting clean technologies and environmental management practices. For example, implementing environmental management systems (EMS) can help companies identify and reduce their environmental impact.
The state of the environment in the Combeima basin is affected by pollution and deforestation. Businesses can contribute to improving this state by investing in ecological restoration and water resource conservation projects. Collaboration with non-governmental organizations and local communities to implement reforestation initiatives can be an effective way to restore damaged ecosystems and improve water quality.
The impacts of economic activities are significant and can affect the health of ecosystems and local communities. Companies have a responsibility to assess and mitigate these impacts through corporate social responsibility (CSR). This includes not only reducing pollution but also supporting local communities through sustainable development programs that promote social and economic well-being.
The answer is where the private sector can make a significant difference. Companies can collaborate with governments and non-governmental organizations to develop initiatives that promote sustainability. This can include creating partnerships for resource management, implementing sustainability certifications, and promoting circular economy practices. Furthermore, education and awareness about the importance of sustainability can be an integral part of business strategy.
In conclusion, by integrating private sector responses into the DPSIR analysis, a more holistic and collaborative approach to sustainability in the Combeima basin can be fostered. Collaboration between the private sector, government, and local communities will not only benefit the environment but also generate economic opportunities and improve the quality of life for people in the region. Long-term sustainability in the Combeima basin depends on a joint commitment to protecting and managing natural resources responsibly.
To measure the effectiveness of the responses proposed within this framework, several indicators and metrics can be used, examples of which are:
These indicators and metrics not only help measure the effectiveness of responses but also allow strategies to be adjusted based on the results obtained.
Natural reserves face many different threats, including biodiversity loss due to habitat degradation and fragmentation, overexploitation of resources (
This approach assesses threats that could lead to alterations of three essential components of the system: 1. Ecological status of aquatic ecosystems; 2. Ecological status of terrestrial habitats; and 3. Biodiversity loss (
CTTV = (Σ threat (1) × 0.35) + (Σ threats (2) × 0.35) + (Σ threats (3) × 0.30) (1)
The identified threats were assessed using two approaches, providing relevant data to characterize the environmental state and current system functions.
The results obtained from the evaluation through the DPSIR framework for the Combeima basin are shown in greater detail and by categories the five components of the framework such as the drivers, pressures, state, impacts and responses identified in the causal network model developed for the study area of the Combeima basin are shown in the Fig.
Causal network: Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) of the Combeima basin.
| Driving force | Pressures | Environmental status | Human impacts | Responses or emergencies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excessive inflow | Pressure of people and vehicles | Damage to vegetationcover | Food and water insecurity. | Limit visitor access |
| Change in behavior of animals | vegetation cover. | Health problems. | Expand tourism capacity | |
| Soil erosion | ||||
| Loss of biodiversity. | ||||
| Excessive development | Offering tourism packages | Habitat reduction | Shortage of drink king water. | Dispersing visitors to other areas and attractions. |
| Development of facilities and services for visitors to the Combeima watershed | Destruction of vegetation | Shortage of food. | Improvements and rehabilitations | |
| Erosion and deterioration of watercourses | There is malnutrition in human beings. | Land use planning land qualification regulations. | ||
| Aesthetic effect (visual pollution) | Increase of diseases. | |||
| Loss of interruptions of traditions and customs. | ||||
| Noise pollution | Increase of tourists. | Pollution of the soundscape. | Irritation of the inhabitants | Awareness campaign |
| Offering of tourist packages. | Disturbance of wildlife | Hearing diseases | Regulation | |
| Limiting visitor access | ||||
| Solid waste | Increased number of tourists. | Habituation of fauna to feed on garbage | Health hazard. | Awareness campaign |
| Waste production and garbage dumping. | Littering | Acute respiratory infections | Regulation | |
| Chemical and microbiological pollution. | Alteration of the landscape. | Diarrhea, dengue fever | Waste containers in appropriate places. | |
| Visual pollution. | ||||
| Water, soil and air pollution | ||||
| Risk of damming of water courses | ||||
| Road saturation | Tours to tourist sites. | Impact on wildlife. | Danger to humans due to accidents. | Increased supply of public transportation |
| Lack of road control. | Damage to roads or trails | Development of visitor plans with environmental and conservation education | ||
| Affection for fauna and flora | ||||
| Atrophy of wildlife. | ||||
| Off road driving | Implementation of cycle rides.Dissemination of sports | Damage to soils, vegetation and fauna.Air and water pollution.Damage to trailsDumping of garbage | Hearing disturbanceDust pollution | Limit accessImplement or improve compliance with the rules. |
| Bathing in rivers or ravines | Pot walks. | Water pollution. | Depletion of water for human consumption | Environmental education campaigns. |
| Excursion students. | Soil erosion. | Skin diseases. | Visitor control. | |
| Business tours | Dumping trash | Enforcing the rules. | ||
| Damage to plant coverage. | ||||
| Damage to forests. | ||||
| Disturbance of wildlife | ||||
| Climate risk | Changes in temperature and precipitation patterns. | Scarcity of water and water stress. | Insecurity food. | National measures against change climatic |
| Forest fires. | Reduction of habitats and decline in the | Displacements. | Provide reforestation programs in the most critical areas. | |
| Soil erosion. | richness of species. | Generate comprehensive programs for the management of highly sensitive ecosystems in national development plans. | ||
| Frequent fires forests and landslides. | ||||
| Climate events dangerous. | ||||
| Soil erosion. | ||||
| Hunting and fishing | Hunting and fishing programs | Loss of resources genetic. | Impact of vegetation and soil. | Restrict access |
| Purchase of animals from hunting and fishing. | Impact on biodiversity | Environmental education programs | ||
| Enforce environmental standards | ||||
| Walking safari | Walks through mountains | Disturbance of fauna and flora | Irritation of human beings | Opening or modification of trails |
| Excursions schools | Road erosion | Shortage of food | Restrict access | |
| Garbage waste. | Environmental education programs. | |||
| Water and soil pollution | ||||
| Contamination of the edaphic biota. | ||||
| Collection of memories | Invitation to take outhuacas. | Restriction of natural objects in danger of disappearance: Coral, shell, horns, exotic plants etc. | Water shortage | Environmental education and awareness campaigns. |
| Sale of plants exotic | Alteration of the soil, flora | Restrictive legislation. | ||
| Collection of natural objects | Water pollution | |||
| Hot spring pollution | Pot walks | Water, soil and airPollution | Stomach damage | Environmental education campaigns |
| Student field trips. | Affecting wildlife | Skin diseases | Environmental education campaigns | |
| Increased production of plastic and food waste | Visual impact | Construction of wwt | ||
| Construction of tourism facilities | Bad odors | Enforcement of environmental regulations | ||
| Damage to vegetation coverage | Visitor control | |||
| Wastewater | Pig raising | Pollution by heavy metals | Stomach damage | Environmental education campaigns |
| Tourism in protected areas | Pollution by sewage water | Skin diseases | Construction of wastewater treatment plants | |
| Mining operations | Affection of fauna | Enforcement of environmental regulations | ||
| Application of agricultural pesticides | Visual impact | Visitor control. | ||
| Bad odors. | ||||
| Agricultural systems | Use, especially inappropriate or excessive use of pesticides and fertilizers. | Soil and water pollution. | Food and watersafety. | Communitybased agroecological programs for sustainability and organic agriculture |
| Land use change. | Support indigenous agriculture | |||
| Decrease in biodiversity. | Develop a community based environmental program |
Graph of DPSIR framework results and hazard perception in the Combeima basin. Source author.
The following analysis through the DPSIR framework shows that the critical pressures in the region include visitor and vehicular pressures, changes in animal behavior, tour package offerings, development of facilities and services for visitors, tourists increase, sustenance mining, deforestation, inadequate or excessive use of pesticides and fertilizers in agro-ecosystems, chemical and microbiological contamination, trips to tourist sites, lack of road management, trips implementation, “pot walks”, forest fires, erosion. The main drivers also involve souvenirs, climatic risks, a force that influences human impact in the Combeima basin (Table
The factors mentioned have generated a decrease in ecosystem services, a decrease in water flows, a reduction in biodiversity, loss of territory, reduction of forests, generating problems in the protected areas of the Combeima basin, compromising the social part of the region such as food and water security, health problems, displacement of territory, loss of autonomy, traditional knowledge among others (Table
The main responses from the departmental and local government correspond to the legal branch, through the different existing laws (Table
Instruments of public policy for tourism management in the Combeima basin.
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| Development Plan for Ibague “Ibague vibra 2020–2023” | This instrument of territorial planning of the city includes the productive and dynamic Ibagué dimension (Mayor’s Office of Ibague 2020), for the revitalization of the local economy in the face of the effects of the pandemic, incorporating innovation, infrastructure and mobility as strategical axis under the Sustainable Development Goals adopted by the UN in their 2030 Agenda. It is aimed at strengthening tourism productivity and competitiveness by positioning it as a sustainable tourist destination through formalization and training, promotion of local tourism boosted by nature and the expansion of tourism infrastructure under clustered territorial planning, according to the guidelines of the Touristic Development Plan of Tolima ( |
| CONPES 3570 - Strategies for mitigating the risk at Río Combeima basin to guarantee water supply in Ibague. | Incorporates actions for sustainable and safe management of the Río Combeima basin through cross-institutional coordination for the prevention and mitigation of risks due to natural phenomena and management of proper response to emergencies, according to the environmental arrangement in the area. |
| It establishes the following components and strategies: | |
| 1. Risk knowledge: Conducting studies on threats, vulnerability and risks and executing mitigating action. | |
| 2. Consideration of the risk variable in territorial planning: Characterization and regulation of soil usage in the touristic area “Ibague-Juntas” – “Villamaría-Cay” | |
| 3. Risk reduction: Lot acquisition, riverbed recovery, management of vegetation coverage and reconversion of soil use, road recovery and public services, intervention of settlements and infrastructure in areas of non-modifiable risks, strengthening of environmental culture for the prevention and mitigation of risks. | |
| 4. Response to emergencies: Contingency plans strengthening and expansion and supplementation of monitoring networks. | |
| Prioritization of projects from the Agenda for Departmental Competitivity 2019–2022. | Prioritization of actions to reduce breaches in competitiveness and innovation in Tolima through the Project: Integral and Innovative Development of Touristic Products for Tolima: Nevados Route. It includes the following components: bilingualism, employee training, bike tourism, facades, lookouts, birdwatching, music, gastronomy, craftsmanship, sports, cultural performances, local iconic products (achiras); rescue of traditional Tolima music. |
| Tourism and culture Chamber of Commerce of Ibague – Clustered | Sectional articulation, local business strengthening and promoting the region as tourists destination, with the creation of business opportunities and the consolidation of the touristic project through the involvement of citizens in the Natured and Craftsmanship boosted tourism in which tourist routes pass through: Ruta Mutis, Ruta Magdalena and Ruta de Los Nevados, by location, installed physical facilities and tourist attractions ( |
| Administrative and Special Region Planning of the central region and the Government of Tolima. | Ibague’s Mayor’s office, with its participation in RAPE assumes land-use planning as the evidence and tool for the increase of productivity, competitivity, and regional sustainability in potential sectors, with the management of tourism under specialization, innovation and diversification. Regional tourism on bicycle / BICIREGION has established regional touristic routes in the area for its positioning as tourist destination. |
The following paper describes four public policy instruments that encourage tourist management for the Combeima basin, where territorial planning and actions for sustainable administration lineaments are given. Furthermore, the articulation of environmental and territorial instruments in the area are required for the systematic operation of the territory and the contribution to solving conflicts due to the overlapping uses for the environmental preservation and restoration on the intrinsic use of the local community in soil management, hydraulic resources and ecosystemic services (Table
It also presented the control of tourist activity in the area through the establishment of registration points, access control and/or verification of technical requirements to visitors entering in conservation and motorized patrolling areas in public spaces, especially on the road. Table
| Mechanisms | Description | Institution |
|---|---|---|
| Information point and access control to the Alto Combeima Forest Reserve and Los Nevados National Park. | Environmental information, access restriction to El Silencio, control and registration of access to Los Nevados-North Route PNN. Verification of associated technical requirements (physical condition, guide accompaniment and equipment). | Los Nevados National Park, CORTOLIMA, Mayor’s Office of Ibagué |
| Police estation and motorized patrol | Motorized police patrols with security and mobility control in the area of the road axis and population centers | Metropolitan Police |
| Control point for environmental risk | Safety information on environmental risks, access control to critical areas, emergency and accident response. | Rescue Agency (Official Fire Department, Civil Defense) |
In the Combeima basin of Ibague, current public policies focus on several strategies to mitigate the negative impacts of deforestation and mining pollution.
On one hand, reforestation and natural area conservation programs are being implemented, aiming to restore damaged ecosystems and promote biodiversity. Awareness campaigns are also being conducted to educate the community on the importance of protecting the environment and natural resources (
Regarding mining, stricter regulations are being established for mining activities to minimize water and soil contamination. This includes requirements for environmental impact studies and constant monitoring of mining operations. Only small-scale subsistence miners are allowed to extract materials such as sand, stone, slate, and gold through artisanal methods, under the supervision of CORTOLIMA, the Tolima Governor’s Office, and the Ibague Mayor’s Office (
A new land use associated with urbanization and tourism has emerged, aligned with the concept of multifunctional rural services, one of which is recreation and enjoyment of the landscape (
The results indicate the need to prioritize rigorous governmental measures for the conservation of the Combeima basin reserve, particularly from sustainable development approaches that effectively involve local communities and their traditional ecological knowledge. This is essential to ensure the well-being of current and future generations and to prevent the loss of biodiversity in this globally unique ecosystem.
The DPSIR assessment of threats to protected areas in the Combeima watershed revealed that of sixteen threats, six had a high score, nine had a medium score and one had a low score. The most significant threats to aquatic ecosystems are subsistence mining activities and biodiversity loss due to deforestation. Other threats include pesticide use, soil erosion, livestock farming, and unsustainable tourism, which require urgent attention (Table
Scoring for ecological threats to protected areas in the Combeima watershed.
| Threats | Categories | Score CC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Null (0) | Under (1) | Medium (2) | High (3) | ||
| 1. Change in the ecological status of aquatic ecosystems (35%) | |||||
| Contaminated water | Does not exist | Outside the zone | Zone of influence | Within the ecological region | 2 |
| Subsistence mining | Does not exist | Outside the zone | Zone of influence | Within the ecological region | 3 |
| Bathing in o quebradas rivers | Does not exist | Outside the zone | Zone of influence | Within the ecological region | 3 |
| Solid waste | Does not exist | Outside the zone | Zone of influence | Within the ecological region | 2 |
| Agriculture (pesticides) | Does not exist | Homemade preparations (infrequent) | Occasional | Chemicals (frequent) | 3 |
| 2. Habitat alteration (35%) | |||||
| Road saturation | Does not exist | No impact | Existence, but without evidence or proof of impact | Existence, with evidence of impact testing | 3 |
| Excessive influx of tourists | Does not exist | No impact | Tourist pressure but no impact | Excessive tourist pressure with high impact | 2 |
| Tourism over development | Does not exist | Outside the zone | Zone of influence | Within the ecological region | 2 |
| Off-road driving | Does not exist | No impact | Existence, but no evidence or proof of impact | Existence, with evidence of impact testing | 2 |
| Noise pollution | Does not exist | No impact | With and without evidence of impact | With evidence of impact | 2 |
| Collection of souvenirs |
Does not exist | No impact | With and without evidence of impact | Existence with evidence of impact | 3 |
| 3. Loss of biodiversity (30%) | |||||
| Deforestation (Logging) | Does not exist | Rarely | Occasional | Frequent | 3 |
| Walking safari | Does not exist | No impact | Existence, but no evidence of impact | Existence, but with evidence of impact | 2 |
| Hunting and Fishing | Does not exist | Subsistence | Commercial within the area | Commercial in and out of the area | 1 |
| Other uses of flora | Does not exist | Subsistence | Commercial within the area | Commercial in and out of the area | 2 |
| Wildlife trafficking | Does not exist | Subsistence | Commercial within the area | Commercial in and out of the area | 2 |
| Total score | 12.9% | ||||
On the other hand, the discharge of contaminated water into rivers and streams by tourists generates high levels of contamination for water for consumption and domestic use, just as the garbage and plastics that are thrown into protected reserve areas create an impact that must be taken into account (Table
This study examines environmental problems in protected areas of the Combeima basin, including the Nevados-Ibagué Natural Park, the Juntas and Villa Restrepo Protected Reserve, the Reserva de la Sociedad Civil, and the Distrito de Conservación de Suelos de los Cerros Noroccidentales. Through two complementary approaches, a DPSIR framework was established to analyze the social, socioeconomic and political components and the assessment of threats that determined which of the pressures analyzed had the most significant impact on the system, considering a quantitative scale (Table
The Combeima basin, located in Ibague, Tolima, is an area rich in biodiversity and culture, making it an ideal location for ecotourism. Local communities play a fundamental role in ecotourism initiatives in this region.
The community and business organizations in the Combeima basin area mainly consist of rural community action boards (27), local agricultural producers’ associations (15), tourism service providers (1), and non-governmental organizations (4) (
Regarding solid waste in the Combeima basin, before Holy Week, 388.3 kg of waste were collected during the awareness and cleanup campaign in the Los Nevados National Natural Park (southern sector) in March 2017, and 250 kg were collected in February 2018. Common types of waste included plastics, tents, camping mattresses, clothing and footwear, packaging, and containers made of plastic, metal, and glass, as well as sanitary waste. Additionally, the disposal of up to 400 kg of waste by visitors in the protected environmental area during the low season and up to 25 m3 of waste in the area influenced by the road axis in the section between the villages of Juntas and Villa Restrepo has been recorded (
Regarding wastewater discharges, microbiological contamination in the Combeima basin from wastewater discharges during the period 2008–2012 and 2014 did not comply with the acceptable limits for total coliforms (1000 MPN) and fecal coliforms (200 MPN) for recreational use, as established by Decree 1594 of the Ministry of Agriculture. This implies a health risk for visitors and a critical impact on the water quality for human consumption for both the local community and the urban population (
On weekends and holidays, access and mobility, without physical or technical restrictions, result in road congestion in the area due to the saturation of its carrying capacity and obstruction caused by parked vehicles. This leads to air pollution, noise pollution, and an increased risk of accidents. It was determined that at least 1863 means of transportation circulate on Sundays, with the following distribution: 100 public collective motorized vehicles, including Buses (64%), Jeeps (24%), and Taxis (12%); 1042 private motorized vehicles, including Cars (59%) and Motorcycles (41%); and 721 individual non-motorized means of transportation, including Bicycles (97%) and Walking (3%), with numbers increasing during vacation periods and holidays (
In conclusion, local communities in the Combeima basin benefit from ecotourism through job creation, support for local businesses, and the promotion of environmental conservation and local culture. On the other hand, it can also present challenges, such as the overuse of natural resources, changes in cultural traditions, and the need to sustainably manage tourist flows.
In different periods, the Combeima basin has experienced significant changes in the environmental threats associated with tourism activity, as shown in Table
| Period | Environmental threats | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Before 2000 | Emerging tourism | Low pressure on natural resources. |
| Indiscriminate collection of flora. | Initial negative effects on local biodiversity | |
| Contamination of water sources by waste. | ||
| 2000–2010 | Increased tourist interest. | Intensification of soil erosion. |
| Increase in the construction of trails and tourist infrastructure. | Decline of native species and habitat degradation. | |
| Pollution by solid waste and wastewater. | Negative impact on local communities. | |
| 2010–2020 | Implementation of conservation regulations and programs. | Environmental management progress, but persistent threats |
| Mass tourism during peak periods. | Congestion and pressure on water resources. | |
| Lack of education and awareness among visitors. | Continued pollution and environmental degradation. | |
| 2020-Present | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tourism. | Reemergence of threats with the return of tourism |
| Increased use of disposable plastics | Urgency of a sustainable and responsible approach to tourism. | |
| Lack of adequate infrastructure for waste management. | Need to involve local communities in tourism management. | |
| Climate change effects in the basin | Water shortages and other environmental problems are exacerbated. |
This table summarizes the environmental threats and their impacts on the Combeima basin over different periods, highlighting the evolving situation and the need for a sustainable approach to tourism.
It was found that most vehicles and visitors are located in the zone of influence of protected areas nearing the Combeima basin, causing a quantitative rating according to the DPSIR model for medium in grade 2, which rates it as tourist pressure that doesn’t generate any impact, which requires larger control from state entities (Tabla 4). A different study at Teide National Park (Tenerife) analyzed the flow of visitors and vehicles to identify the causes of a possible sensation that tourism was excessive. This serves as a manifestation of the pressing need for measures that protect the conditions of the National Park to preserve not only the space, but the environment, the population, companies and visitors with measures that can be implemented in management (
The Combeima basin has had an important development in tourism and preservation of protected areas, considering that there are about 26 tourist sites in which visitors can perform nature-boosted tourism. Using data obtained from the assessment of threats in protected areas, it an alteration in the ecological habitat was found. This was rated as mild in the zone of influence of the Combeima basin (Table
Additionally, in the Combeima basin, pollution has occurred in protected areas due to the noise of cars, motorbikes, construction sites and air traffic, directly impacting predators and birds. According to the quantitative assessment of ecological threats in the DPSIR framework, it was categorized as medium in second degree, in which there is pollution, but no evidence (Table
High pollution by solid waste such as plastics, styrofoam, garbage, glass, food waste, fruit and vegetable peels, cans, and others also impact the environment, and through quantitative assessment of the DPSIR model employed in the research project showed a medium rating, where solid waste are found in the zone of influence (Tabla 4). To deal with it, it has been registered waste disposal up to 400 kg from visitors in low season, and up to 25 m3 of waste on the road connecting Juntas and Villa Restrepo (
Below are the leading causes of waste pollution in the area:
Other research projects have found problems in solid waste disposal generated by adventure-boosted tourism at Huascarán National Park, which has been analysed by
As for the contamination of the Comebima river, through which many creeks run, it is the main river that runs through Ibague. These waters are used for consumption, sports, industry, and irrigation systems. Besides, residual waters also end up at this place, creating high pollution levels, and that, according to the quantitative assessment carried out, corresponds to a medium rating (Table
The area of environmental protection of the Combeima basin presents a preserved area that stretches about 9238,39 ha (
On the other hand, visitors that come to the Combeima basin can enjoy about 26 natural tourist sites, such as the thermal waters of el Rancho, creeks, waterfalls, recreational places and others. According to quantitative ecological threats through the DPSIR framework, it presented a high rating in a third degree, caused impacts throughout the entire basin, polluting waters, creating environmental and sanitary risks, ecosystem degradation, fire risks, waste generation, riverbeds pollution, soil pollution, environmental deterioration, and degradation of foliage, among others (Tabla 4). It requires with urgency a deconcentration of the influx of visitors and its redistribution in the area to ensure its ecological role of buffering and provisioning hydraulic resources and ecosystemic services for Ibague. Some studies confirm the aforementioned in Easter Island, which was attributed to economic spikes, but at the same time generated irreversible environmental damage to its territory. The government focused on the growth of the island, without foreseeing the environmental impacts that would stem from it (
Different kinds of crops that use pesticides and pollute hydraulic sources in the Combeima basin are considered, creating changes in soil use, soil and water contamination and the decrease of biodiversity. Through the assessment of ecological threats under the DPSIR framework, a high rating in third degree was generated, which indicates that farms frequently use pesticides to fertilize and fight plagues and illnesses in their crops and livestock. Studies indicate that the farming activity is an ever-growing source of contamination (Tabla 4). It is responsible for the introduction of fertilizers, pesticides and sediments to coastal waters through rivers. The pesticide run-off leads to the contamination of superficial waters and biota, dysfunction of ecological systems due to loss of big predators due to damages and speed of growth, impacts on public health thanks to the consumption of polluted organisms, considering that pesticides can be transported like aerosols to distances as great as 1000 km from the site of application (
This territory has a socio-productive system characterized by agricultural, silvopastoral, and non-metallic materials extraction activities and emerging tourist activity based on a gastronomy route and complementary nature tourism offering during weekends and holidays, which has determined its physical transformation and spontaneous densification.
It is a strategic area for conservation due to its provision of ecosystem services such as water, food, and natural materials; climate regulation and support of the rural population’s cultural identity; and natural environments for tourism and recreation.
The tourism area in the Combeima region faces challenges due to its emerging nature, natural growth, low productivity and inadequate commercial management. The region’s low tourist importance, the division of the tourist offer, and its poor promotion and sales hinder its growth as a tourist destination. The geographical location, connectivity, landscape, biosphere, and ecosystem services also hinder its growth. The absence of a tourism information management system has caused local tourism demand to be low and irregular, with only 4.12% of participation in the departmental GDP and 50.78% of hotel occupancy in 2015 (
It has been identified that the number of encounters between visitors increases in non-specialized tourist activities, in sites located in public recreational and tourist spaces in populated centers and natural areas, concentrated in parks, viewpoints, pedestrian paths, and water-round zones with tourist use in the Combeima River and its tributaries, la Perla, la González, la Plata, and Cay.
Likewise, the number of encounters with the local community increases with the visitor’s stay in the population centers and their movement along the network of tertiary roads and trails in the agricultural production areas in natural areas. This has generated an impact due to the loss of their culture and customs.
The analysis of the use and transformation of tourism in the Combeima basin area establishes that tourist facilities and holiday homes have caused a dynamic occupation and transformation of the territory, with alterations in the composition of vegetation, overcrowding, disintegrated architectural development, reduction of tourist use and major changes associated with the fragmentation of natural vegetation, change in soil structure, conflicts with conservation, environmental risks, densification and conflicts of use with tourism and recreation.
In terms of conservation, biological functions need to be better supported through the expansion of the protected area. This can be done through zoning, identifying the transition zones and buffer zones needed by the reserve (
Since the Combeima basin is of great importance due to its protected areas, which contain important fauna species and forest areas with native species of the region that conserve water resources, the Corporación Autónoma del Tolima y Municipio de Ibagué must strictly control tourists.
The DPSIR model reveals that critical pressures in the Combeima basin of Ibagué are linked to mining, deforestation, pesticide use, poor water management, unsustainable agricultural systems, transportation, tourism, urbanization, forest fires, glacier loss, soil erosion, and human impact (Tabla 4).
The DPSIR assessment of threats in the protected areas of the Combeima watershed shows that most threats, especially subsistence mining activities and deforestation, have high and medium ratings, indicating a significant impact on aquatic ecosystems. The presence of multiple threats that require urgent attention highlights the need to implement management and conservation strategies that address both human activities and their effects on biodiversity and the quality of water resources, thus ensuring the long-term protection of these ecosystems.
The DPSIR model is useful for identifying the different behaviors that generate pressures on the system, but the lack of quantitative data limits our ability to understand cause-effect relationships more fully. This affects the assessment of important issues such as water pollution and health impacts from pesticide use, which in turn can make it difficult to make informed decisions to protect ecosystem services (
We thank the professors and library staff of the Universidad de Manizales for the information provided for this research work in the Combeima watershed of the city of Ibague.
We sincerely thank the Corporación Autónoma Regional del Tolima, Universidad del Tolima, the Mayor’s Office of Ibagué and their professionals for providing information, plans and data, which allowed us to adequately execute the research work in the protected areas of the Combeima watershed.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
No funding was reported.
Conceptualization J.A.H.B and G.Y.F.-Y., methodology G.Y.F.Y., software J.A.H.B. and G.Y.F.-Y., validation G.Y.F.-Y., formal analysis J.A.H.B., investigation J.A.H.B., resources J.A.H.B., data curation J.A.H.B., writing – original draft preparation J.A.H.B., writing – review and editing J.A.H.B., visualization G.Y.F.-Y., supervision G.Y.F.-Y., project administration J.A.H.B., funding acquisition J.A.H.B., All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
José Armando Huepa Briñez https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6282-1566
Gloria Yaneth Florez-Yepes https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4185-0178
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.