Corresponding author: Xin Zhang ( xzh9078@126.com ) Academic editor: Rita Yam
© 2020 Ping Zhang, Ning Wang, Lianwei Yang, Xin Zhang, Qi Liu.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Zhang P, Wang N, Yang L, Zhang X, Liu Q (2020) Evaluation and sensitivity analysis of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space based on its quality in China. Nature Conservation 40: 93-141. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.40.23017
|
Evaluation of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space is important for controlling haze. In this study, the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018 are analyzed based on green space quality and sensitivity using a geographic information system (GIS) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) imagery. The results showed that the benchmark ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space when considering only the area of green space showed a trend that increases first and then decreases in 2001–2018, with 9000458.55 million Kg, 9145110.75 million Kg and 7734526.75 million Kg in 2001, 2013 and 2018, respectively. However, the corrected functions based on green space quality were 7724215.34 million Kg, 8320301.79 million Kg and 6510132.55 million Kg in the corresponding years. This indicated large differences between ecosystem service functions of haze absorption based on the quality and area of green space; only considering the area of green space to evaluate ecosystem service functions will result in overestimation. In terms of the spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space, there were greater differences in the benchmark and corrected functions, and the spatial distributions of the maximum, intermediate and minimum ecosystem service functions were notably different. However, the benchmark and corrected functions all showed a consistent trend in the rank of their contribution rates and ecosystem service functions as well as consistent distribution trends: the spatial distribution of ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space was very different in the same year, but there was little difference among different years. The change coefficients for the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by arable land and grass land remained stable, whereas the coefficient of sensitivity for forest cover was elastic. Patch density (PD) and the ecosystem service functions of SO2 absorption, NOx absorption, dust retention and total ecosystem services showed a significant negative correlation, with correlation coefficients of -0.407, -0.511, -.330 and -0.332, respectively. In contrast, the area-weighted mean shape index (SAPE_AM) and ecosystem service functions exhibited significant positive relationships with correlation coefficients of 0.650, 0.634, 0.568 and 0.570, respectively. The results provide an improved method for evaluating the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space as well as a reference for the prevention and control of haze and the coordinated development of regional societies, the economy and the environment.
ecosystem service functions, haze absorption, quality of green space, sensitivity analysis
In recent years, the frequent occurrence of haze in China has seriously threatened human health and environmental safety, becoming a major livelihood and environmental problem that cannot be ignored and needs to be solved. Exploring haze absorption from the perspective of ecosystem services is of great practical significance for scientific formulation of effective haze control policies (
Haze, a kind of disastrous weather occurring in the near-ground atmospheric layer, is the result of interaction between specific climatic conditions and human activities (
The hazards of haze include the following aspects: on the one hand, haze reduces visibility, increases the frequency of traffic accidents, and has an important impact on highways, railways, aviation, shipping, and power supply systems (
Haze is affected by pollution sources (
Green space is an important part of social, economic and natural systems (
Previous studies on green space have focused on the impacts of heat island mitigation (
The dust retention and atmospheric pollutant absorption effects of green space have mostly explored the functional effects of different plant species based on individual differences in the levels of green space and have been limited to small scales (
The objectives of this study were: 1) comparison and analysis of the spatial and temporal patterns of the benchmark and corrected values of ecosystem service functions of haze absorption based on the quality of green space; 2) sensitivity analysis of changes in ecosystem service functions; 3) determination of the relationship between the landscape pattern and the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space, providing a scientific basis for the quantitative evaluation of air pollution regulation using service functions, green space planning and urban ecological construction of green space in China.
The main components of haze are SO2, NOX and particulate matter. The uptake of haze material by types of green space per unit area (
The uptake of haze components by green space per unit area (kg·ha-1·yr-1).
Ecosystem service | Green space types | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Arable land | Forest cover | Grass land | Total | |
Absorption of sulfur dioxide | 45.00 | 152.13 | 279.03 | 476.16 |
Absorption of nitrogen oxides | 33.50 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 45.50 |
Dust retention | 0.95 | 21655.00 | 1.20 | 21657.15 |
Total | 79.45 | 21813.13 | 286.23 | 22178.81 |
The ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space include the absorption of SO2, NOX and respirable particulate matter. According to the various types of green space and the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by each type of green space per unit area, the total ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China can be calculated from formula (1) (
(1)
where ESF is the total ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space; Ai is the area of green space type i; Fij is the ecosystem service of absorbing haze component j by green space i per unit area; i is the green space type including forest cover, grass land and arable land; and j is the haze component including SO2, NOX and particulate matter.
Both the ecosystem itself and its spatial heterogeneity affect ecosystem service functions. Considering the ecological system, the quality of green space plays an important role in its function, and the vegetation coverage (normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)) and net primary productivity (NPP) affect the corresponding service functions. The above ecosystem service functions calculation is only based on the land use area, without considering the impact of green space quality, so the results cannot reflect the true ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space. Using NDVI and NPP as evaluation indicators of green space quality and the correction coefficient to adjust the ecosystem service functions, the formula for the calculation is as follows (
(2)
(3)
(4)
where fi and NPPi are the NDVI and NPP of grid I, respectively; NPPmean and fmean are the mean NPP and NDVI values of various ecosystems in the study region, respectively; NDVImax and NDVImin are the maximum and minimum NDVI values for the entire growing season; Qi is the green space quality coefficient; ESF is the ecosystem service functions before the green space quality correction; and ESF` is the ecosystem service functions after the green space quality correction.
To reflect the dependence of ecosystem service functions on the ecological functions index over time, the economic elasticity coefficient is selected to calculate the coefficient of sensitivity (formula (6)) (
(5)
where ESF is the total ecosystem service functions; F is the functions coefficient; i and j are the initial and adjusted functions coefficients, respectively; k is the green space type; and CS is the coefficient of sensitivity. If CS > 1, the ESF for F is flexible, indicating that the total ecosystem service functions increase faster than the functions coefficient and that the proportion of the total ecosystem service functions and the functions coefficient are increasing. However, if CS < 1, the ESF for F is inelastic. CS = 1 represents complete elasticity; CS = 0 represents complete inelasticity. A higher ratio indicates that the elasticity of the ecosystem service functions index is more important.
Landscape pattern indices are used to describe the spatial organization of a landscape and provide a quantitative measure of the composition and spatial configuration of landscape structure. The interaction between landscape patterns and ecological processes as well as green space impacts haze absorption to different degrees. Based on previous research (
(6)
where PD is patch density; A is the total area of the landscape; Ni is the number of patches in landscape i; i is the landscape element; and n is the total number of patches in the landscape.
(7)
(8)
where m is the total number of landscape types; i and k are the numbers of patches of types i and k, respectively; eik is the total boundary length of the patch types between patch types i and k; E is the total boundary length of the landscape, including the background; and pi is the perimeter of patch type i.
The ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space, including measures of the absorption of SO2 and NOX, dust retention and the total ecosystem service functions, were calculated for different provinces in China using a geographic information system (GIS). The calculations of landscape pattern indexes including PD, IJI, SHAPE_AM, and SHDI for provinces of China were performed in FRAGSTATS. Correlations between landscape patterns and the absorption of SO2 and NOX, dust retention and total ecosystem service functions were calculated as Pearson correlation coefficients as follows:
(9)
where cov (X, Y) represents the covariance between two variables, and σX and σY refer to the variance of the two variables. The Pearson correlation coefficient is used to measure the correlation between two variables. The value of this coefficient falls between 1 and -1: 1 represents a full positive correlation of the variables; 0 indicates that the variables are independent; and -1 indicates a completely negative correlation.
A MODIS land cover classification product (mod12q1) was used for the land use data for China in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018. The spatial resolution of this product is 500 m, and land use is divided into arable land, forest cover, grass land, construction land, unused land and water bodies. Because the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by water bodies are relatively small (
As shown in Table
Ecosystem service functions (benchmark values) of haze absorption by green space in China in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018 (106 Kg).
Green space types | Ecosystem service | 2001 | 2004 | 2007 | 2010 | 2013 | 2016 | 2018 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arable land | Absorption of sulfur dioxide | 8591.57 | 9622.49 | 9006.41 | 8835.75 | 9329.70 | 6805.30 | 6864.45 |
Absorption of nitrogen oxides | 6395.95 | 7163.41 | 6704.77 | 6577.72 | 6945.45 | 5066.17 | 5110.20 | |
Dust retention | 181.38 | 203.14 | 190.14 | 186.53 | 196.96 | 143.67 | 144.92 | |
Total | 15168.90 | 16989.04 | 15901.31 | 15600.00 | 16472.11 | 12015.14 | 12119.58 | |
Percentage (%) | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.16 | |
Forest cover | Absorption of sulfur dioxide | 61945.79 | 60457.74 | 61255.74 | 63225.21 | 62993.37 | 53141.91 | 52954.45 |
Absorption of nitrogen oxides | 2443.14 | 2384.45 | 2415.92 | 2493.60 | 2484.46 | 2095.91 | 2088.52 | |
Dust retention | 8817696.60 | 8605879.12 | 8719471.22 | 8999815.52 | 8966814.78 | 7564504.47 | 7537820.05 | |
Total | 8882085.53 | 8668721.31 | 8783142.89 | 9065534.33 | 9032292.61 | 7619742.29 | 7592863.02 | |
Percentage (%) | 98.68 | 98.67 | 98.68 | 98.75 | 98.77 | 98.17 | 98.16 | |
Grass land | Absorption of sulfur dioxide | 100608.06 | 96509.66 | 98942.51 | 96357.20 | 93922.48 | 126584.95 | 126285.53 |
Absorption of nitrogen oxides | 2163.38 | 2075.25 | 2127.57 | 2071.97 | 2019.62 | 2721.96 | 2715.53 | |
Dust retention | 432.68 | 415.05 | 425.51 | 414.39 | 403.92 | 544.39 | 543.11 | |
Total | 103204.12 | 98999.97 | 101495.59 | 98843.57 | 96346.03 | 129851.31 | 129544.16 | |
Percentage (%) | 1.15 | 1.13 | 1.14 | 1.08 | 1.05 | 1.67 | 1.67 | |
Total | Absorption of sulfur dioxide | 171145.43 | 166589.89 | 169204.66 | 168418.15 | 166245.56 | 186532.16 | 186104.43 |
Absorption of nitrogen oxides | 11002.47 | 11623.11 | 11248.26 | 11143.30 | 11449.52 | 9884.05 | 9914.25 | |
Dust retention | 8818310.65 | 8606497.31 | 8720086.87 | 9000416.45 | 8967415.67 | 7565192.53 | 7538508.07 | |
Total | 9000458.55 | 8784710.32 | 8900539.79 | 9179977.89 | 9145110.75 | 7761608.74 | 7734526.75 | |
Percentage (%) | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100 | |
Percentage (%) | Absorption of sulfur dioxide | 1.90 | 1.89 | 1.90 | 1.83 | 1.82 | 2.40 | 2.41 |
Absorption of nitrogen oxides | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | |
Dust retention | 97.98 | 97.97 | 97.97 | 98.04 | 98.06 | 97.47 | 97.46 | |
Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100 | |
Percentage (%) | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100 |
The contributions to haze absorption by green spaces indicated that the types are very different (Table
The primary haze absorption ecological function by green space was primarily dust retention (Table
The ecosystem service functions (corrected value) of haze absorption by green space in China increased by 596086.46 million Kg (7.72%) from 2001–2013 (Table
Ecosystem service functions (corrected values) of haze absorption by green space in China in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018 (106 Kg).
Green space types | Ecosystem service | 2001 | 2004 | 2007 | 2010 | 2013 | 2016 | 2018 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arable land | Absorption of sulfur dioxide | 10623.08 | 12214.32 | 11709.68 | 11281.32 | 11648.15 | 3912.29 | 3921.82 |
Absorption of nitrogen oxides | 7908.29 | 9092.88 | 8717.21 | 8398.32 | 8671.40 | 2699.42 | 2691.12 | |
Dust retention | 224.27 | 257.86 | 247.20 | 238.16 | 245.91 | 1672.12 | 1884.59 | |
Total | 18755.64 | 21565.06 | 20674.09 | 19917.80 | 20565.45 | 8283.83 | 8497.53 | |
Percentage (%) | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.13 | |
Forest cover | Absorption of sulfur dioxide | 53221.67 | 52114.40 | 53757.20 | 56257.75 | 57464.17 | 45259.90 | 45242.86 |
Absorption of nitrogen oxides | 2099.06 | 2055.39 | 2120.18 | 2218.80 | 2266.38 | 1776.64 | 1775.52 | |
Dust retention | 7575858.33 | 7418243.69 | 7652088.58 | 8008029.84 | 8179758.25 | 6357175.05 | 6347113.37 | |
Total | 7631179.06 | 7472413.48 | 7707965.96 | 8066506.39 | 8239488.80 | 6404211.47 | 6394131.50 | |
Percentage (%) | 98.80 | 98.86 | 98.89 | 98.97 | 99.03 | 98.29 | 98.22 | |
Grass land | Absorption of sulfur dioxide | 72412.13 | 63058.21 | 63850.41 | 62667.81 | 58732.04 | 56177.81 | 56741.54 |
Absorption of nitrogen oxides | 1557.08 | 1355.94 | 1372.98 | 1347.55 | 1262.92 | 1246.38 | 1260.91 | |
Dust retention | 311.42 | 271.19 | 274.60 | 269.51 | 252.58 | 45770.85 | 49501.07 | |
Total | 74280.63 | 64685.34 | 65497.99 | 64284.87 | 60247.54 | 103195.05 | 107503.52 | |
Percentage (%) | 0.96 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 1.58 | 1.65 | |
Total | Absorption of sulfur dioxide | 136256.89 | 127386.94 | 129317.30 | 130206.88 | 127844.36 | 105350.00 | 105906.22 |
Absorption of nitrogen oxides | 11564.44 | 12504.22 | 12210.37 | 11964.67 | 12200.70 | 5722.45 | 5727.55 | |
Dust retention | 7576394.02 | 7418772.74 | 7652610.38 | 8008537.51 | 8180256.73 | 6404618.02 | 6398499.03 | |
Total | 7724215.34 | 7558663.89 | 7794138.04 | 8150709.06 | 8320301.79 | 6515690.35 | 6510132.55 | |
Percentage (%) | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |
Percentage (%) | Absorption of sulfur dioxide | 1.76 | 1.69 | 1.66 | 1.60 | 1.54 | 1.62 | 1.63 |
Absorption of nitrogen oxides | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.09 | |
Dust retention | 98.09 | 98.15 | 98.18 | 98.26 | 98.32 | 98.30 | 98.29 | |
Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | |
Percentage (%) | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
The contribution rate of the various types of green space to haze absorption varied greatly. The contribution rate of forest cover was the largest, accounting for 98.80%, 98.86%, 98.89%, 98.97%, 99.03%, 98.29% and 98.22% of the total in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively. The second was grass land, which accounted for 0.96%, 0.86%, 0.84%, 0.79%, 0.72%, 1.58% and 1.65% of the total in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively. Arable land made the smallest contribution, accounting for 0.24%, 0.29%, 0.27%, 0.24%, 0.25%, 0.13% and 0.13% of the total in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively.
The haze absorption by green space was dominated by dust retention, the functions of which accounted for 98.09%, 98.15%, 98.18%, 98.26%, 98.32%, 98.30% and 98.29% of the total in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively. The function of SO2 absorption accounted for 1.76%, 1.69%, 1.66%, 1.60%, 1.54%, 1.62% and 1.63% of the total, and the function of NOX absorption accounted for 0.15%, 0.17%, 0.16%, 0.15%, 0.15%, 0.09% and 0.09% in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively.
As can be seen from Figure
Comparison of benchmark and corrected ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018 based on the quality of green space (106 Kg).
Compared with the benchmark values, the contribution rates of the corrected value of haze absorption by forest cover increased by 0.11%, 0.19%, 0.21%, 0.21%, 0.26%, 0.12% and 0.06% in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively, while the contribution rates of the corrected value of haze absorption by grass land decreased by 0.18%, 0.27%, 0.30%, 0.29%, 0.33%, 0.09% and 0.02%, whereas those of arable land increased by 0.07%, 0.09%, 0.09%, 0.07% and 0.07% in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010 and 2013 but decreased by 0.03% and 0.03% in 2016 and 2018, respectively.
The analysis of the ecosystem services functions of haze absorption by green space revealed that the corrected value of dust retention increased by 0.11%, 0.18%, 0.21%, 0.21%, 0.26%, 0.83% and 0.83% compared with the benchmark value in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively. The corrected value of SO2 absorption decreased by 0.14%, 0.20%, 0.24%, 0.24%, 0.28%, 0.79% and 0.78% in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively. The corrected value of NOX absorption in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010 and 2013 increased by 0.03%, 0.03%, 0.03%, 0.03% and 0.02%, respectively, although the value decreased by 0.04% and 0.04% in 2016 and 2018, respectively. These results indicated that the benchmark and corrected values of the contribution rates of haze absorption by different types of green space and thus the ecosystem service functions are different, but all the functions exhibited a consistent trend. The contribution rates were ranked as forest cover, grass land and arable land, and the order of ecosystem service function was dust retention, SO2 absorption, and NOX absorption.
Figures
The maximum ecosystem service functions for the absorption of SO2 (Fig.
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2001 (106 Kg) (a, b, c and d are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, and the total ecosystem service functions, respectively).
However, compared with the maximum and minimum values, intermediate ecosystem service functions for the absorption of SO2 (Fig.
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2004 (106 Kg) (a, b, c and d are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, and the total ecosystem service functions, respectively).
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2007 (106 Kg) (a, b, c and d are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, and the total ecosystem service functions, respectively).
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2010 (106 Kg) (a, b, c and d are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, and the total ecosystem service functions, respectively).
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2013 (106 Kg) (a, b, c and d are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, and the total ecosystem service functions, respectively).
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2016 (106 Kg) (a, b, c and d are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, and the total ecosystem service functions, respectively).
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2018 (106 Kg) (a, b, c and d are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, and the total ecosystem service functions, respectively).
Intermediate ecosystem service functions for dust retention (Fig.
As shown in Figures
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2001 (106 Kg) (a, b, c and d are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, and the total ecosystem service functions, respectively).
In contrast, the intermediate ecosystem service functions of SO2 absorption (Fig.
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2004 (106 Kg) (a, b, c and d are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, and the total ecosystem service functions, respectively).
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2007 (106 Kg) (a, b, c and d are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, and the total ecosystem service functions, respectively).
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2010 (106 Kg) (a, b, c and d are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, and the total ecosystem service functions, respectively).
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2013 (106 Kg) (a, b, c and d are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, and the total ecosystem service functions, respectively).
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2016 (106 Kg) (a, b, c and d are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, and the total ecosystem service functions, respectively).
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China in 2018 (106 Kg) (a, b, c and d are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, and the total ecosystem service functions, respectively).
The results show that there was a great difference in the spatial distributions of the benchmark and corrected values of haze absorption by green space, and the spatial distributions of the maximum, intermediate and minimum ecosystem service function values were obviously different. However, the spatial distributions of the benchmark and corrected values also exhibited the same trend. In the same year, the spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space was very different, but in different years, the difference in the spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space exhibited little difference.
Figures
The ecosystem service functions of the absorption of SO2 (Fig.
Spatial distributions of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in different regions of China in 2001 (106 Kg) (a, b, c, d and e are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, the total ecosystem service functions and the percent contribution of different ecosystem service functions to haze absorption in different zones, respectively).
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in different regions of China in 2004 (106 Kg) (a, b, c, d and e are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, the total ecosystem service functions and the percent contribution of different ecosystem service functions to haze absorption in different zones, respectively).
The ecosystem service functions of the absorption of SO2 (Fig.
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in different regions of China in 2007 (106 Kg) (a, b, c, d and e are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, the total ecosystem service functions and the percent contribution of different ecosystem service functions to haze absorption in different zones, respectively).
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in different regions of China in 2010 (106 Kg) (a, b, c, d and e are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, the total ecosystem service functions and the percent contribution of different ecosystem service functions to haze absorption in different zones, respectively).
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in different regions of China in 2013 (106 Kg) (a, b, c, d and e are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, the total ecosystem service functions and the percent contribution of different ecosystem service functions to haze absorption in different zones, respectively).
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in different regions of China in 2016 (106 Kg) (a, b, c, d and e are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, the total ecosystem service functions and the percent contribution of different ecosystem service functions to haze absorption in different zones, respectively).
Spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in different regions of China in 2018 (106 Kg) (a, b, c, d and e are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, the total ecosystem service functions and the percent contribution of different ecosystem service functions to haze absorption in different zones, respectively).
As shown in Figures
Spatial distributions of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in different regions of China in 2001 (106 Kg) (a, b, c, d and e are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, the total ecosystem service functions and the percent contribution of different ecosystem service functions to haze absorption in different zones, respectively).
Spatial distributions of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in different regions of China in 2004 (106 Kg) (a, b, c, d and e are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, the total ecosystem service functions and the percent contribution of different ecosystem service functions to haze absorption in different zones, respectively).
Spatial distributions of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in different regions of China in 2007 (106 Kg) (a, b, c, d and e are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, the total ecosystem service functions and the percent contribution of different ecosystem service functions to haze absorption in different zones, respectively).
Spatial distributions of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in different regions of China in 2010 (106 Kg) (a, b, c, d and e are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, the total ecosystem service functions and the percent contribution of different ecosystem service functions to haze absorption in different zones, respectively).
Spatial distributions of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in different regions of China in 2013 (106 Kg) (a, b, c, d and e are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, the total ecosystem service functions and the percent contribution of different ecosystem service functions to haze absorption in different zones, respectively).
Spatial distributions of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in different regions of China in 2016 (106 Kg) (a, b, c, d and e are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, the total ecosystem service functions and the percent contribution of different ecosystem service functions to haze absorption in different zones, respectively).
Spatial distributions of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in different regions of China in 2018 (106 Kg) (a, b, c, d and e are the absorption of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, dust retention, the total ecosystem service functions and the percent contribution of different ecosystem service functions to haze absorption in different zones, respectively).
The results show that there was a great difference in the spatial distributions of the benchmark and corrected values of haze absorption by green space in different provinces in China, and the maximum and minimum of ecosystem service functions were obviously different. However, the spatial distributions of the benchmark and corrected values also exhibited the same trend. In the same year, the spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space was very different in different province, but in different years, the difference in the spatial distribution of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space exhibited little difference in different provinces.
The coefficient of sensitivity of the ecosystem service functions for different green space types was generally quite different from 2001–2018 (Table
Sensitivity analysis of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China from 2001–2018.
Coefficient of sensitivity | Green space types | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arable land | Forest cover | Grass land | |||||
FC+50% | FC-50% | FC+50% | FC-50% | FC+50% | FC-50% | ||
2001 | % | 0.0843 | -0.0843 | 49.3424 | -49.3424 | 0.5733 | -0.5733 |
CS | 0.0017 | – | 0.9868 | – | 0.0115 | – | |
2004 | % | 0.0967 | -0.0967 | 49.3398 | -49.3398 | 0.5635 | -0.5635 |
CS | 0.0019 | – | 0.9868 | – | 0.0113 | – | |
2007 | % | 0.0893 | -0.0893 | 49.3405 | -49.3405 | 0.5702 | -0.5702 |
CS | 0.0018 | – | 0.9868 | – | 0.0114 | – | |
2010 | % | 0.0850 | -0.0850 | 49.3767 | -49.3767 | 0.5384 | -0.5384 |
CS | 0.0017 | – | 0.9875 | – | 0.0108 | – | |
2013 | % | 0.0901 | -0.0901 | 49.3832 | -49.3832 | 0.5268 | -0.5268 |
CS | 0.0018 | – | 0.9877 | – | 0.0105 | – | |
2016 | % | 0.0774 | -0.0774 | 49.0861 | -49.0861 | 0.8365 | -0.8365 |
CS | 0.0015 | – | 0.9817 | – | 0.0167 | – | |
2018 | % | 0.0783 | -0.0783 | 49.0842 | -49.0842 | 0.8374 | -0.8374 |
CS | 0.0016 | – | 0.9817 | – | 0.0167 | – |
To quantitatively understand the relationship between land use patterns and ecosystem service functions, a correlation analysis was conducted (Table
Correlation coefficients between landscape pattern metrics and different ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China.
SO2 | NOx | DUST | ALL | PD | SHAPE_AM | IJI | SHDI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SO2 | 1.000 | 0.772** | 0.887** | 0.891** | -0.407** | 0.650** | -0.606** | -0.242** |
NOX | 0.772** | 1.000 | 0.750** | 0.752** | -0.511** | 0.634** | -0.507** | -0.316** |
DUST | 0.887** | 0.750** | 1.000 | 0.999** | -0.330** | 0.568** | -0.449** | -0.202** |
ALL | 0.891** | 0.752** | 1.000** | 1.000 | -0.332** | 0.570** | -0.452** | -0.203** |
PD | -0.407** | -0.511** | -0.330** | -0.332** | 1.000 | -0.342** | 0.564** | 0.642** |
SHAPE_AM | 0.650** | 0.634** | 0.568** | 0.570** | -0.342** | 1.000 | -0.783** | -0.149 |
IJI | -0.606** | -0.507** | -0.449** | -0.452** | 0.564** | -0.783** | 1.000 | 0.227** |
SHDI | -0.242** | -0.316** | -0.202** | -0.203** | 0.642** | -0.149 | 0.227** | 1.000 |
The correlation coefficients between IJI and the ecosystem service functions of SO2 absorption, NOx absorption, dust retention and total ecosystem services exhibited significant negative relationships with correlation coefficients of -0.606, -0.507, -0.449 and -0.452, respectively. The correlation coefficients between SHDI and the ecosystem service functions of SO2 absorption, NOx absorption, dust retention and total ecosystem services also exhibited significant negative relationships with correlation coefficients of -0.242, -0.316, -0.202 and -0.203, respectively. These results indicate that IJI and SHDI have important effects on different ecosystem service values. In general, the smaller the IJI and SHDI, the larger the ecosystem service functions.
In this paper, the quality of green space is used to modify the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption, making the quantitative assessment results of haze absorption by green space more scientific and reasonable. However, the results revealed that the ecosystem service function of haze absorption by green space in China from 2001 to 2018 shows a trend of first increasing and then decreasing, suggesting that the forest area with high haze absorbing capacity should be increased when adjusting the structure of ecological land use, and the occupation of cultivated land due to the rapid expansion of construction land should be regulated to improve the ability of green space to alleviate haze.
Previous literatures explored the responses of ecosystem service functions to land use change, mainly through analyses of water yield (
There is a correlation between landscape patterns and ecosystem service functions (
Uncertainty in ecosystem service assessments has been demonstrated and analyzed by previous studies (
This paper also has some limitations. First of all, there are many factors affecting haze, including natural factors such as vegetation coverage (
This paper analyzes the temporal and spatial distributions and sensitivities of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space based on its quality in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018 in China. The main conclusions of this work are as follows:
(1) In general, the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space exhibited first an increasing and then decreasing trend from 2001–2018 in China, increasing by 144652.20 million Kg (1.61%) in 2001–2013 primarily due to the implementation of the Three North Shelterbelt Development Program, the Conversion from Cropland to Forest Program and the Natural Forest Protection Program by the Chinese government. However, the ecosystem service functions decreased by 1410584.00 million Kg from 2013–2018, a decrease of 15.42%, primarily because of adjustment of ecological land structure and the reduction of arable land caused by the expansion of construction land. The contributions of forest cover to the ecosystem service values of haze absorption by green space were the largest, with values of 98.68%, 98.67%, 98.68%, 98.75%, 98.77%, 98.17% and 98.16% in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively. The primary ecological function of haze absorption by green space was mainly dust retention, which accounted for 98.09%, 98.15%, 98.18%, 98.26%, 98.32%, 98.30% and 98.29% of the total in 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively.
(2) Different ecosystem service functions exhibited great differences in spatial distribution within the same year but small differences between years. In conclusion, the results show that the ecosystem service functions and spatial distribution of haze absorption by green space based on its quality differ greatly from the value considering only the area. Furthermore, the benchmark and corrected values of the contribution rates of haze absorption by different types of green space and ecosystem service functions are different, but the values show a consistent trend. The contribution rates are ranked from largest to smallest as forest cover, grass land and arable land, and the order of ecosystem service function is dust retention, absorption of SO2, and absorption of NOX. Moreover, the spatial distributions of the benchmark and corrected values also exhibit the same distribution trend. In the same year, the spatial distribution of the ecosystem service values of haze absorption by green space is very different, but there is little difference among the different years.
(3) The coefficients of sensitivity for the ecosystem service functions for forest cover are elastic with values of 0.9868 in 2001, 2004 and 2007, 0.9875 in 2010, 0.9877 in 2013, 0.9817 in 2016 and 2018, respectively, and the change rates were ± 49.3424%, ± 49.3398%, ± 49.3405%, ± 49.3767%, ± 49.3832%, ± 49.0861% and ± 49.0842%, respectively. The coefficients of sensitivity for arable land and grass land were inelastic. There was a significant negative relationship between PD and the ecosystem service functions of SO2 absorption, NOx absorption, dust retention and total ecosystem services, with the correlation coefficients of -0.407, -0.511, -0.330 and -0.332, respectively. Nevertheless, the correlation coefficients between SHAPE_AM and the ecosystem service functions of SO2 absorption, NOx absorption, dust retention and total ecosystem services exhibited significant positive relationships with correlation coefficients of 0.650, 0.634, 0.568 and 0.570, respectively. The green space landscape pattern, which exhibited a uniform patch distribution, has an important effect on the absorption of polluted gases, dust retention and air purification. A higher density of green space patches is accompanied by lower levels of fragmentation and higher levels of air purification.
(4) This paper analyzes and evaluates ecosystem service functions and the spatial distributions thereof, based on the quality of green space, providing a basis for further improving the method for calculating haze absorption by green space and revealing the relationship between ecosystem service functions and landscape patterns. This work is important for the rational planning and improvement of green space ecosystems and for improving the city environment.
(5) This paper analyzes the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space in China, and further research should focus on two approaches. The first is the development of a mechanistic model of the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption by green space that should consist of three modules including a haze diffusion module, a module for haze absorption by green space, and a module that evaluates ecosystem service functions. By including rainfall, wind speed, pollution sources, land use and vegetation types, the function coefficients for haze absorption and other data can be collected in a database. After the model is calibrated and validated, the ecosystem service functions dynamics of haze absorption by green space can be analyzed under different green space and climate change scenarios to predict future changes. The second approach includes a first-tier classification of green space to evaluate the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption in this paper, but second-tier classifications can reflect the differences between different green space types, thus providing more objective and reasonable results. Compared to a first-tier classification of forest cover, second-tier classifications, such as trees and shrubs, have different impacts on the ecosystem service functions of haze absorption. Therefore, further research should provide in-depth explorations of second-tier classifications of green space.
This research was supported by the Scientific Research Program Funded by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (Program No. 17JK0325), the Fund Project of Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation (2018-JC12), Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (2016A002), the PhD research start-up foundation of Xi’an Polytechnic University (No. BS1306).