Research Article |
Corresponding author: Agnieszka Ważna ( a.wazna@wnb.uz.zgora.pl ) Academic editor: Jochen A.G. Jaeger
© 2020 Agnieszka Ważna, Agnieszka Kaźmierczak, Jan Cichocki, Jacek Bojarski, Grzegorz Gabryś.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Ważna A, Kaźmierczak A, Cichocki J, Bojarski J, Gabryś G (2020) Use of underpasses by animals on a fenced expressway in a suburban area in western Poland. Nature Conservation 39: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.39.33967
|
Expressways act as barriers to animals that block free movement in their habitats, especially when the roads are continuously fenced to prevent collisions between animals and vehicles. Various types of animal passages have been repeatedly studied in terms of their utility, albeit rather less frequently in the suburban environment. We conducted our research in a section of the fenced expressway S3 connecting two closely located cities in western Poland (Lubuskie province). Over the course of one year, we monitored four underpasses intended for small- and medium-sized animals using tracks. The underpasses were inspected weekly. Animal traces most frequently found belonged to roe deer Capreolus capreolus (20.9%), red fox Vulpes vulpes (15.1%), wild boar Sus scrofa (14%), and domestic dog Canis l. familiaris (12.4%). Surprisingly, the results of our study indicate that underpasses for small and medium mammals are also used by ungulate mammals. The use of the underpasses varied seasonally, being the highest in spring (37.9%) and the lowest in winter (10.4%). Moreover, seasonal differences in the use of passages were related to particular species/groups of animal species. We found that 22% of animals that entered the passage did not completely traverse it. People accounted for 17.1% of all stated traces in the underpasses. Stagnant water in the underpasses reduced the number of predatory mammals and wild boars using the underpasses but did not affect the activity of roe deer. These studies indicate that animal underpasses located in suburban areas are used by many species of animals despite the activity of humans and domesticated mammals.
barrier effect, expressway, suburban area, vertebrate, wildlife underpasses
At the global scale, roads have a considerable impact on the surrounding wildlife (
Another equally important effect of road infrastructure is wildlife mortality due to collisions with vehicles (
With new investments in road infrastructure, various solutions are used to prevent these collisions and to simultaneously allow animals to move around the area that the road crosses. The solutions include tunnels (e.g. for amphibians), underpasses, and overpasses. The size of a passage affects its usage by various animal species that show selectivity in this aspect, especially large animals (
The usage of the passages by wildlife also depends on the location of the passages in the environment as well as their sizes and shapes. In numerous publications on the use of underpasses by animals, the problem of animals rejecting the option of moving under the road has not been raised. It is unknown how many individuals withdraw from passing under the road by using an underpass after having entered it. Furthermore, there are no known factors that have been reported to affect such animal behaviors.
This study was conducted with the aim of estimating the usage of underpasses under an expressway by wildlife in a suburban environment. We tested the hypotheses that (1) the number of animals that use underpasses varies during the year; (2) underpasses that differ in technical parameters are not used by animals to the same extent; (3) the stagnation of rainwater in underpasses does not affect their use by large animals, such as roe deer and wild boar; (4) animals that intend to migrate rarely abandon their attempts during the action; and (5) human activity in underpasses adversely affects their use by wildlife.
This research covered a section (16 km) of the S3 expressway located in western Poland between the cities Zielona Góra (138,898 inhabitants) and Nowa Sól (39,459 inhabitants; Figure
The section of the expressway that was monitored in this study was built in 2006–08, and it was the first two-lane road of an expressway type in the western part of Poland. The second two-lane roadway was built after the present studies have been completed, in 2015–18, and the construction included the reconstruction of animal passages. During the monitoring period of our study, the roadway was fenced and separated the surrounding areas, thus preventing animals from entering the road lane. The fence is 220 cm high. The mesh size is 20×30 cm. From the ground up to 100 cm, the mesh is dense and is of 5×30 cm size. It allows medium and small mammals to enter the road. During our study, we did not conduct any survey on the mortality of animals caused by collisions with vehicles.
The road runs in a lowland landscape. Vegetation on both sides of the road includes mainly pine forests, with the dominant Scots pine Pinus sylvestris, and an admixture of black locust Robinia pseudoacacia and Norway maple Acer platanoides. The undergrowth comprises shrubs such as: bird cherry Padus avium, alder buckthorn Frangula alnus, young Norway maple, and northern red oak Quercus rubra. In several places, the road adjoins meadows with willows Salix spp. Monitored passages are located in the same environmental conditions.
Species of medium- and large-sized mammals that occur in the area near the expressway and were included in hunters’ inventories of the years 2012–13 include: red deer Cervus elaphus (19 individuals), roe deer Capreolus capreolus (330 individuals), wild boar Sus scrofa (70 individuals), red fox Vulpes vulpes (35 individuals), pine marten Martes martes and stone marten Martes foina (20 individuals), European badger Meles meles (19 individuals), raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides (20 individuals), European polecat Mustela putorius (11 individuals) European hare Lepus europaeus (29 individuals) (data available from Polish Hunting Association in Zielona Góra).
This research included four underpasses for small- and medium-sized animals (Figure
We did not distinguish between species that – due to their similar size, body structure, and movement – could be easily misidentified. We described these as groups of species: large mustelids: pine marten, stone marten, European polecat; small mustelids: stoat Mustela erminea, and least weasel Mustela nivalis; small mammals: rodents from genus Apodemus and Microtus, and soricomorphs.
The monitored underpasses are intended to aid small- and medium-sized animals. Along the section of the road we monitored, there are no other passages. The underpasses are elliptical in shape. They consist of sections characterized by different size parameters. Between the sections, there are openings in which animals are exposed to traffic-related factors (e.g. noise, lighting; Table
Type, dimensions, openness index (OI) and function of the monitored crossing structures in the S3 expressway in western Poland.
Number of crossing | Dimensions (m) | Crossing type | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Width | Height | Length | OI | |||
I | section Ia | 6.4 | 2.2 | 8.1 | 1.74 | underpass for medium mammals |
section Ib | 6.4 | 2.5 | 16.2 | 0.99 | ||
section Ic | 3.1 | 1.9 | 13.1 | 0.45 | drainage | |
II | 3.8 | 1.5 | 16.8 | 0.34 | underpass for small mammals | |
III | section IIIa | 1.75 | 1.7 | 7.8 | 0.30 | drainage |
section IIIb | 1.75 | 1.45 | 18.7 | 0.14 | underpass for small mammals | |
section IIIc | 1.9 | 1.1 | 13.1 | 0.16 | ||
IV | section IVa | 6.5 | 2 | 7.3 | 1.78 | underpass for medium mammals |
section IVb | 6.5 | 2 | 17.3 | 0.75 |
We calculated the openness index (OI) according to the following formula:
Openness index = (width × height) / length
We calculated the index of use (UI) of the underpasses for particular animal species/groups by the formula:
Index of use = number of individuals of each species found in the underpass / number of underpass checks
We determined the percentage of a particular species in relation to the total number of individuals found to have used the underpass, and the percentage of individuals of a given species in relation to the total number of recorded animals. We analyzed the variability of wildlife activity in months and seasons: spring (March–May), summer (June–August), autumn (September–November), and winter (December–February). We calculated the Shannon Diversity Index (H) for every wildlife underpass.
For the calculations, the R program (R Core Team, 2018) was used.
During the year-round monitoring, we recorded traces of 364 animals in the four underpasses under the S3 road. This translates to an average of seven animals per crossing monitoring event. Of the 15 animal species/groups we found, the most frequently recorded animals included: roe deer (UI = 1.46), red fox (UI = 1.05), and wild boar (UI = 0.98). Moreover, the underpasses were intensively used by domestic dogs Canis l. familiaris (UI = 0.86; Figure
Activity of animals that explored and crossed the S3 expressway underpasses in suburban areas in western Poland.
The use of the underpasses by wildlife was variable. The most intensively used underpasses were I (UI = 2.70) and IV (UI = 2.42). Underpasses II and III were used less frequently, and their utilization rate amounted to 0.94 and 0.92, respectively. The differences in the underpass efficiencies are statistically significant (χ2 = 244.92, df = 42, p < 0.001). Additionally, underpasses I and IV featured higher values of H index (Table
Wildlife activity in the S3 expressway underpasses in suburban areas. All animals observed in the underpasses were counted, including the ones that crossed the road and those which abandoned their attempts.
Animal species / group of species | Crossing | Total | ||||||||
I | II | III | IV | |||||||
N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
Anurans | 5 | 3.6 | 1 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 5.6 | 13 | 3.6 |
Lacertids | 12 | 8.5 | 2 | 4.1 | 5 | 10.4 | 15 | 11.9 | 34 | 9.3 |
European mole | 4 | 2.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 8.7 | 15 | 4.1 |
Small mammals | 8 | 5.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.6 | 10 | 2.8 |
European hare | 3 | 2.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.8 |
Hedgehog | 3 | 2.1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2.1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1.1 |
Roe deer | 13 | 9.2 | 26 | 53.1 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 29.4 | 76 | 20.9 |
Wild boar | 3 | 2.1 | 9 | 18.4 | 1 | 2.1 | 38 | 30.2 | 51 | 14.0 |
Red fox | 34 | 24.1 | 4 | 8.2 | 15 | 31.2 | 2 | 1.6 | 55 | 15.1 |
European badger | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.6 |
Raccoon dog | 4 | 2.8 | 1 | 2.0 | 1 | 2.1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1.7 |
Domestic cat | 5 | 3.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1.4 |
Domestic dog | 15 | 10.6 | 4 | 8.2 | 14 | 29.2 | 12 | 9.5 | 45 | 12.4 |
Large mustelids | 16 | 11.4 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 22.9 | 2 | 1.6 | 29 | 8.0 |
Small mustelids | 16 | 11.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 4.4 |
Total | 141 | 100.0 | 49 | 100.0 | 48 | 100.0 | 126 | 100.0 | 364 | 100.0 |
Shannon diversity index H' | 3.393 | 1.183 | 1.284 | 2.426 | – |
Individual animal species showed preferences for select underpasses. Wild boar did not select all the underpasses with equal frequency (χ2 = 69.39, df = 3, p < 0.001), and the species was most frequently found in Underpass IV. Roe deer more frequently chose underpasses IV and II than I and III (χ2 = 40.53, df = 3, p < 0.001). Large mustelids preferred underpasses I and III (χ2 = 23.55, df = 3, p < 0.001), whereas small mustelids used only Underpass I (χ2 = 48.00, df = 3, p < 0.001).
We discovered a seasonal diversity in wildlife activity in the underpasses (χ2 = 86.251, df = 42, p < 0.001; Table. 3). The greatest activity was observed in the spring, and the underpasses were most intensively used in April, May, and June (Figure
Use of S3 expressway underpasses in western Poland by wildlife that explored and crossed the road.
Roe deer revealed higher activity in the spring and summer seasons (χ2 = 19.47, df = 3, p < 0.001). Wild boar used the underpasses mainly in spring. In the remaining seasons, wildlife rarely used the underpasses and, in winter, the underpasses were almost unused (χ2 = 43.51, df = 3, p < 0.001). Small mustelids were most frequently using the underpasses in summer and autumn. However, in spring and winter, their activity decreased (χ2 = 11.00, df = 3, p = 0.011). Moreover, increased activity of domestic dogs was recorded in spring (χ2 = 11.80, df = 3, p = 0.008). Half of the total number of the recorded species/groups was found to be inactive in winter (anurans, lacertids, European hare, hedgehog, wild boar, European badger, and raccoon dog) (Table
Seasonal activity of wildlife in the S3 expressway underpasses in suburban area in western Poland.
Animal species/ group species | Spring | Summer | Autumn | Winter | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |
Anurans | 2 | 1.5 | 4 | 3.9 | 7 | 8.3 | 0 | 0 |
Lacertids | 18 | 13.0 | 11 | 10.6 | 5 | 6.0 | 0 | 0 |
European mole | 6 | 4.4 | 3 | 2.9 | 4 | 4.8 | 2 | 5.3 |
Small mammals | 6 | 4.4 | 1 | 1.0 | 2 | 2.4 | 1 | 2.6 |
European hare | 1 | 0.7 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 |
Hedgehog | 3 | 2.2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 |
Roe deer | 23 | 16.7 | 32 | 30.8 | 15 | 17.9 | 6 | 15.8 |
Wild boar | 32 | 23.2 | 10 | 9.6 | 9 | 10.7 | 0 | 0 |
Red fox | 11 | 8.0 | 14 | 13.5 | 17 | 20.2 | 13 | 34.2 |
European badger | 1 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 |
Raccoon dog | 3 | 2.2 | 2 | 1.9 | 1 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 |
Domestic cat | 1 | 0.7 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1.2 | 2 | 5.3 |
Domestic dog | 21 | 15.2 | 6 | 5.8 | 9 | 10.7 | 9 | 23.7 |
Large mustelids | 9 | 6.5 | 10 | 9.6 | 6 | 7.1 | 4 | 10.5 |
Small mustelids | 1 | 0.7 | 9 | 8.7 | 5 | 6.0 | 1 | 2.6 |
Total | 138 | 100.0 | 104 | 100.0 | 84 | 100.0 | 38 | 100.0 |
Seasonal % | 37.9 | 28.6 | 23.1 | 10.4 |
During the monitoring period, we found that rainwater stagnates periodically in underpasses II, III, and IV. However, water did not stagnate in Underpass I. Underpass IV was flooded with water in 17% of control, Underpass II in 77% of control, and Underpass III in 35% of control. The differences in the period of water stagnation in the underpasses are statistically significant (χ2 = 52.701, df = 3, p < 0.001). Wild boar avoided underpasses where there was stagnating water (χ2 = 46.394, df = 3, p < 0.001), whereas roe deer did not reveal any activity alterations and used the underpasses with equal frequency regardless of water stagnation (χ2 = 19.4, df = 3, p < 0.001). Only 4% of carnivorous mammals used the underpasses when they were flooded.
Some animals (22%, Figure
During the year, we also found human activity in the underpasses (75 persons). People used individual underpasses to a different degree (χ2 = 64.68, df = 3, p < 0.001). The largest proportion of footprints (64%) were found in Underpass I, localized closest to the town Zielona Góra. In the remaining underpasses, human activity was lower (Figure
Proportion of animals which crossed and did not cross the S3 expressway using the underpasses.
Many factors affect the use of underpasses by wildlife, for example, appropriate design, size parameters (dimensions), and appropriate location (
The problem of underpass use by animals is widely studied worldwide in regard to various aspects, e.g., vegetation covering the area near entrances to the underpass, road fencing, and distance to urban areas (e.g.
There is a significant publication that discusses the usage of underpasses under expressways by wildlife in the mountains in the south of Poland (
Furthermore, in western Poland we observed a much smaller difference between the numbers of domesticated and wild species despite the passages being situated in urbanized areas. In southern Poland, domesticated species accounted for 25% of all recorded animals (
Species of mammals observed in passages under S3 road are characteristic of woodland areas of western Poland (
The use of underpasses by roe deer and wild boar is surprising because the underpasses were intended for small- and medium-sized animals and underpasses I, II and III were characterized by low openness ratio index. Underpass IV was used most frequently by roe deer and wild boar possibly due to the higher value of openness ratio index. Nevertheless, we confirmed the observations of
The results of our study indicate significant seasonal differences in the use of animal passages. The examined road underpasses were used most intensively in spring and least frequently in winter. The results confirm the observations made by
The results of this research indicate that a large proportion of animals that attempt to move through the underpass under a road abandon these attempts. Standard monitoring with the use of strips of sand did not allow us to record the number of animals that turned back before traversing the passage. We assume that animals that have passed through the monitored strip and turned back, in some cases, might have been even counted twice.
Human presence, moreover, has an impact on the use of underpasses. The fewer people use an underpass, the more animals tend to use it (
The obtained results indicate the importance of planning and construction of animal passages even in urbanized areas which do not display unique natural characteristics. Underpasses are an important element to prevent the isolation of local populations and, presumably, could reduce the negative impact of urban development.
We thank the Polish Hunting Association in Zielona Góra for providing a hunters’ mammals inventories. We are particularly grateful to the Academic Editor and anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript.