Research Article |
Corresponding author: Orsolya Valkó ( valkoorsi@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Stefano Chelli
© 2020 Balázs Deák, Orsolya Valkó, Csaba Albert Tóth, Ágnes Botos, Tibor József Novák.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Deák B, Valkó O, Tóth CA, Botos Á, Novák TJ (2020) Legacies of past land use challenge grassland recovery – An example from dry grasslands on ancient burial mounds. Nature Conservation 39: 113-132. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.39.52798
|
Due to large-scale agricultural intensification, grasslands are often restricted to habitat islands in human-transformed landscapes. There are approximately half a million ancient burial mounds built by nomadic steppic tribes in the Eurasian steppe and forest steppe zones, which act as habitat islands for dry grassland vegetation. Land use intensification, such as arable farming and afforestation by non-native woody species are amongst the major threats for Eurasian dry grasslands, including grasslands on mounds. After the launch of the Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition framework of the European Union, in Hungary there is a tendency for ceasing crop production and cutting non-native woody plantations, in order to conserve these unique landmarks and restore the historical grassland vegetation on the mounds. In this study, restoration prospects of dry grassland habitats were studied on kurgans formerly covered by croplands and Robinia pseudoacacia plantations. Soil and vegetation characteristics were studied in thespontaneously recovering grasslands. The following questions were addressed: 1; How does site history affect the spontaneous grassland recovery? 2; Do residual soil nutrients play a role in grassland recovery? In former croplands, excess phosphorus, while in former Robinia plantations, excess nitrogen was present in the soil even four years after the land use change and grassland vegetation was in an early or mid-successional stage both on the mounds. The results showed that, without proper management measures, recovery of grassland vegetation is slow on mounds formerly used as cropland or black locust plantation. However, restoration efforts, focused on the restoration of mounds formerly covered by croplands, can be more effective compared to the restoration of mounds formerly covered by forest plantations.
cropland, grassland restoration, kurgan, nitrogen, phosphorus, Robinia pseudoacacia, soil, steppe
In intensively used agricultural landscapes, the remaining natural and semi-natural habitats often occur on small natural features (SNFs). Many of SNFs, such as verges, field margins and midfield islets are physically inappropriate for agricultural utilisation (
The Cross-Compliance system of the European Union Common Agricultural Policy is a progressive initiative that contributes to a more environmental-friendly agriculture. One of its pillars is the Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition framework, which contributes to the development of a long-term and ecologically sustainable agricultural environment (
In grassland restoration, spontaneous recovery became increasingly acknowledged (
Here we study two scenarios of grassland recovery: recovery on former croplands and former plantations on mounds. Ploughing and afforestation are responsible for the reduction of grassland area and decline of grassland species richness in many parts of Eurasia (
The objective was to evaluate the prospects for restoring grasslands in degraded (ploughed and planted with black locust) ancient burial mounds, in order to provide information that will support the development of management plans, restoration and conservation of the local biota. We asked the following questions: 1; How does site history affect the spontaneous grassland recovery? 2; Do residual soil nutrients play a role in grassland recovery? Our final goal was to give recommendations for the restoration of grasslands on variously degraded burial mounds.
We studied soil and vegetation of six mounds situated in the Hortobágy National Park, EastHungary (Figure
The vegetation of four surveyed mounds was formerly seriously degraded: two mounds (Porosállás- and Vajda-mounds) were formerly covered by black locust (R. pseudoacacia) plantations and two mounds were used as arable fields (Boda- and Tök-mounds). According to the oldest available orthophotos, all the two mounds with former croplands were already ploughed and the two mounds with Robinia plantations were already afforested in 1961. Based on archive descriptions, we can estimate that afforestation lasted for at least 80 years and crop production for at least 200 years on the studied mounds. Spontaneous grassland recovery started in 2012 in all sites: plantations have been cut and ploughing was stopped. As reference, we selected two mounds (Kettős- and Lapos-mounds) with well-preserved pristine grassland vegetation. Figure
Soil conditions were sampled in ten randomly distributed 1 m × 1 m permanent plots on each mound. From each plot, three subsamples were collected with 100 cm3 stainless steel sampling cylinders, representing the uppermost 5 cm of the soil. First soil sampling was carried out in late June 2014 and it was repeated in late June 2016. On each mound, we designated ten 1 m × 1 m plots (altogether 60 plots), in which we recorded the percentage cover of vascular plant species in June 2016.
Soil subsamples from the same plots and same year were then mixed and, after homogenisation, dried at 40 °C until weight constancy (approximately three days). In the laboratory, pH (H2O; KCl), plant available nitrogen content and plant available phosphorus content were measured. Soil pH was measured with standard glass electrode in 1:2.5 suspensions prepared with water (pHH2O), and KCl solution (pHKCl), respectively (MSZ-08-0206:1978 2.1). Plant available P was determined after extraction with 0.1 M ammonium-lactate solution buffered with 0.4 M acetic acid at pH 3.7. Plant available NO3--N was extracted with 1 M KCl solution. Both N and P content of extracts were determined by spectrophotometric measurements, according the Hungarian standards (MSZ 20135 1999).
We calculated cover-weighted scores of Ellenberg ecological indicator values for water (WB), nutrient (NB) and light (LB) adapted to the Hungarian conditions (
For visualising the vegetation patterns on the mounds with different site history, we used Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA), based on specific cover scores. Soil nitrate and phosphorus content were included as overlay (CANOCO 5;
To explore the effects of ‘site history’, time since grassland recovery started (‘year’) and their interaction (explanatory variables) on soil pH (pH(H2O); pH(KCl)), soil nitrate and phosphorus content (dependent variables), we used Repeated Measures General Linear Models (RM GLMs) accounting for the normal distribution of the dependent variables (
We used Generalised Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) to explore the effects of ‘site history’ and two soil parameters (‘soil nitrate content’ and ‘soil phosphorus content’) (explanatory variables) on the naturalness index, ecological indicator values and the species richness and cover of grassland species and weeds in 2016 (dependent variables). The ID of the ‘study sites’ was included in the models as a random factor. Scores of naturalness index, ecological indicator values and cover of grassland and weed species were log-transformed to approximate them to normal distribution. Species number of grassland specialists and weeds were fitted using Poisson distribution with a loglink. We used Tukey’s test for calculating post-hoc pair-wise comparisons. The RM GLMs and GLMMs were calculated using IBM SPSS Statistics v. 22 programme (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05.
We did not detect any difference in the soil pH(H2O) and pH(KCl) of the studied mounds (Table
Effects of site history, year and their interaction on soil attributes (RM GLM). Notations: *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; n.s.: non-significant.
Parameter | Site history | Year | Site history × Year | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dfnum | dfden | F | p | dfnum | dfden | F | p | dfnum | dfden | F | p | |
pH(H2O) | 2 | 1.067 | 2.636 | n.s. | 1 | 1 | 0.425 | n.s. | 2 | 1.247 | 1.426 | n.s. |
pH(KCl) | 2 | 1.088 | 2.822 | n.s. | 1 | 1 | 1.080 | n.s. | 2 | 1.323 | 1.972 | n.s. |
NO3--N content | 2 | 1.467 | 37.289 | *** | 1 | 1 | 2.190 | n.s. | 2 | 1.331 | 0.138 | n.s. |
P content (P2O5) | 2 | 1.730 | 10.592 | ** | 1 | 1 | 17.590 | ** | 2 | 1.363 | 3.120 | n.s. |
Soil characteristics (A – pH(H2O), B – pH(KCl), C – NO3--N content and D – P content (P2O5)) measured in the studied mounds (grasslands, former croplands and former plantations). White boxes represent data from 2014, grey boxes represent data from 2016. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (Tukey test, p ≤ 0.05).
We found altogether 92 vascular plant species on the studied mounds. Total species numbers were 64 in the grasslands, 50 in the former croplands and 24 in the former plantations. The vegetation composition of mounds with a different site history was well separated on the DCA ordination (Figure
DCA plot of the vegetation of study sites, based on the species composition. Soil nitrate and phosphorus content were included as an overlay. Notations: squares – grasslands; diamonds – former croplands, circles – former plantations. Eigenvalues were 0.753 and 0.548 for the first and second axis, respectively. Cumulative explained variance of the first and the second axis were 12.72% and 21.98%, respectively.
Indicator species of grasslands were Carex praecox Schreb., Koeleria cristata (L.) Pers., Salvia nemorosa L. and Festuca pseudovina Hack. ex Wiesb. (Table
Results of indicator species analyses of the vegetation of mounds with different site history. Notations: G – mounds covered by grassland; A – mounds formerly covered by arable land; P – mounds formerly covered by Robinia plantation; *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Species | Site history | Indicator value | p | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Carex praecox Schreb. | G | 0.55 | *** | 11 |
Koeleria cristata (L.) Pers. em. Borbás ex Domin | G | 0.49 | *** | 14 |
Salvia nemorosa L. | G | 0.40 | *** | 8 |
Festuca pseudovina Hack. ex Wiesb. | G | 0.40 | ** | 13 |
Elymus hispidus (Opiz) Melderis | G | 0.35 | ** | 7 |
Arenaria serpyllifolia L. | G | 0.33 | * | 18 |
Plantago lanceolata L. | G | 0.32 | ** | 8 |
Bromus hordeaceus L. | G | 0.32 | * | 14 |
Trifolium retusum L. | G | 0.30 | ** | 6 |
Euphorbia virgata Waldst. et Kit. | G | 0.30 | *** | 6 |
Erodium cicutarium (L.) L’Hér. | G | 0.26 | * | 8 |
Eryngium campestre L. | G | 0.25 | * | 5 |
Trifolium striatum L. | G | 0.25 | ** | 5 |
Stipa capillata L. | G | 0.20 | * | 4 |
Cerastium semidecandrum L. | G | 0.20 | * | 4 |
Bromus tectorum L. | A | 0.84 | *** | 18 |
Torilis arvensis (Huds.) Link | A | 0.49 | *** | 12 |
Convolvulus arvensis L. | A | 0.44 | * | 34 |
Alopecurus pratensis L. | A | 0.43 | *** | 12 |
Achillea collina Becker ex Rchb. | A | 0.42 | ** | 18 |
Veronica arvensis Murray | A | 0.34 | ** | 8 |
Geranium molle L. | A | 0.26 | * | 9 |
Xanthium strumarium L. | A | 0.25 | ** | 5 |
Vicia grandiflora Scop. | A | 0.20 | * | 4 |
Lolium perenne L. | A | 0.20 | * | 4 |
Elymus repens (L.) Gould | P | 0.65 | *** | 30 |
Ballota nigra L. | P | 0.51 | *** | 14 |
Bromus sterilis L. | P | 0.35 | *** | 7 |
Silene alba (Mill.) E.H.L. Krause | P | 0.28 | * | 11 |
Galium aparine L. | P | 0.26 | * | 13 |
Conium maculatum L. | P | 0.20 | * | 4 |
Site history significantly affected the naturalness of the vegetation, it was the lowest in former plantations and the highest in grasslands (Table
Effects of site history, soil nitrate and phosphorus content on the vegetation characteristics of the studied mounds (Generalised Linear Mixed Models). *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; n.s., non-significant. Notations: NB, WB, LB: cover-weighted means of ecological indicator values for nutrients, water and light, respectively.
Site history | Nitrate | Phosphorus | ||||
F | p | F | p | F | p | |
Naturalness | 46.35 | *** | 5.15 | * | 5.40 | * |
Species richness | ||||||
Grassland species | 17.59 | *** | 0.19 | n.s. | 1.80 | n.s. |
Weeds | 1.95 | n.s. | 0.61 | n.s. | 0.61 | n.s. |
Cover | ||||||
Grassland species | 17.74 | *** | 0.20 | n.s. | 3.09 | n.s. |
Weeds | 70.27 | *** | 0.03 | n.s. | 0.01 | n.s. |
Ecological indicator values | ||||||
NB | 9.02 | *** | 0.93 | n.s. | 1.19 | n.s. |
WB | 7.97 | *** | 2.51 | n.s. | 0.44 | n.s. |
LB | 21.38 | *** | 13.09 | *** | 3.25 | n.s. |
Vegetation characteristics in the studied mounds (grasslands, former croplands and former plantations): A species richness of grassland species B species richness of weeds C cover of grassland species D cover of weeds E cover-weighted ecological indicator scores for nutrients (NB) F cover-weighted ecological indicator scores for water (WB) G cover-weighted ecological indicator scores for light (LB) H naturalness score. Different letters indicate significant differences between groups (Tukey test, p ≤ 0.05).
We found that pH was highest, close to 7 or even greater, in former cropland in 2014. The likely reason for this is that, in croplands, there was no organic matter accumulation on the surface and the surficial soil layer was constantly mixed with subsoil and the subsoils’ carbonate saturation status was always higher in these soils than at the surface. During the study period, pH was not changed significantly in any of the mounds, but a slight increase in former plantation and slight decrease on former cropland couldbe detected. Soil pH was much more heterogeneous in the grasslands compared to the former croplands and plantations. This supports the findings of the
Plant available N content was the lowest in the former cropland and its amount did not change by time since abandonment. This is due to the additive effect of the depletion of soil N stocks by decades-long cultivation and the slow soil N-recovery during secondary succession (
Plant available P content was the highest in the former croplands in 2014 as result of former P-fertilisation, but after the abandonment, it started to decrease significantly. As P has a low mobility in soils, this decrease can be a result of the P consumption by the vegetation and soil microbes. In the grasslands and former plantations, P content was similarly low, in both cases low pH likely facilitated the mobilisation (
We found that, four years after land use change, grassland vegetation was in an early or mid-successional stage, both on the mounds formerly used as cropland and forest plantation. The three vegetation types were clearly separated by their species composition (Figure
Species composition of weeds reflected well the site history. Weeds are generally R-strategists and have a dense and persistent seed bank (
The reason for the low success of vegetation recovery on former plantations is the legacy of the former woody vegetation and forestry practices. For establishing a forest plantation, more drastic soil works are needed compared to arable use. Even though the soil works are not so frequent, such as in the case of arable use, they can affect the soil structure in deeper layers. Thus, it affects the chemical properties of the soil in a more intense way; furthermore, deep ploughing transports the seed bank of grassland species to such deep layers (even 1 m deep) from where they are not able to germinate and re-establish. Due to the shading effect of woody vegetation, a milder micro-climate is present in the understorey of the woody habitats (
Our results suggest that the legacy of a former intensive land use (i.e. cropland and plantation) is more complex than the effect of excess soil nutrients. Even though former croplands were characterised by excess P and former plantations by excess N (Figure
We found that, without proper management measures, recovery of grassland vegetation is slow on mounds formerly used as cropland or black locust plantation. This is in line with the findings of
Even though spontaneous regeneration of grassland habitats can be a good solution in nature conservation practice, it might be risky as the vegetation development is often unpredictable. The outcome of spontaneous succession is highly dependent on initial site conditions, including land use intensity, landscape context, climaticand edaphic factors. Spontaneous recovery is often unpredictable also due to the founder effect, i.e. that the vegetation composition of late successional phases strongly depends on the initial plant assemblages (
The study was supported by the NKFI KH 130338, NKFI KH 126476, NKFI FK 124404 and NKFIH-1150-6/2019 grants. BD, OV and TJN were supported by the Bolyai János Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. TJN was supported by the ÚNKP-19-4-DE-129 New National Excellence Program (Bolyai+) of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology. The authors are grateful to Iva Apostolova and Igor Soares dos Santos for their useful suggestions on the manuscript.